東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Corporate investment in education: ...

Mamokhin, Gloria Marli.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Corporate investment in education: Motivational factors and trends in direct giving.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Corporate investment in education: Motivational factors and trends in direct giving./
Author:	Mamokhin, Gloria Marli.
Description:	222 p.
Notes:	Adviser: Stuart E. Gothold.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International62-06A.
Subject:	Business Administration, General. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3018021
ISBN:	049328429X

Corporate investment in education: Motivational factors and trends in direct giving.
Mamokhin, Gloria Marli.

Corporate investment in education: Motivational factors and trends in direct giving. - 222 p.

Adviser: Stuart E. Gothold.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--University of Southern California, 2000.

This study focused on the motivational factors and trends behind direct corporate giving to education. Unlike foundation giving, direct giving is more difficult-to track. It comes from the corporate General Fund and often does not get reported in IRS forms or Annual Reports. The 90's have seen a definite relationship between corporate gifts to schools, social responsibility, and the intelligent self-interest of a corporation. In many companies, the pattern of giving represents the corporate values and the community needs. The contributions of companies, however, comes nowhere near the 2% of pretax income set as a goal of the Filer Commission in 1975.

ISBN: 049328429XSubjects--Topical Terms:

1017457
Business Administration, General.

Corporate investment in education: Motivational factors and trends in direct giving.
LDR:03229nam 2200325 a 45 001 925818
005 20110419
008 110419s2000 eng d
020 $a 049328429X
035 $a (UnM)AAI3018021
035 $a AAI3018021
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Mamokhin, Gloria Marli. $3 1249312
245 1 0 $a Corporate investment in education: Motivational factors and trends in direct giving.
300 $a 222 p.
500 $a Adviser: Stuart E. Gothold.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 62-06, Section: A, page: 1999.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--University of Southern California, 2000.
520 $a This study focused on the motivational factors and trends behind direct corporate giving to education. Unlike foundation giving, direct giving is more difficult-to track. It comes from the corporate General Fund and often does not get reported in IRS forms or Annual Reports. The 90's have seen a definite relationship between corporate gifts to schools, social responsibility, and the intelligent self-interest of a corporation. In many companies, the pattern of giving represents the corporate values and the community needs. The contributions of companies, however, comes nowhere near the 2% of pretax income set as a goal of the Filer Commission in 1975.
520 $a What are the giving policies of corporations? Why does a company give to education? Is there a consistent message a corporation gives that makes it a strong ‘corporate citizen’? To what extent are tax considerations or company return on investment the ‘real motivation’ behind giving?
520 $a A questionnaire was sent to decision-makers at corporations and schools. Cash gifts or human resource match equal to or more than $1 0,000 was a prerequisite for corporate participation. Data from the self-report questionnaire was compared to the outcomes suggested by the corporations. The response of corporate and school participants was limited by their willingness to respond to pointed questions regarding their business and tax structure.
520 $a Corporations gave to schools to guarantee a supply of well-trained and productive potential employees and to build community relations in their local area. The trend was to give paid released time to corporate volunteers that assist in schools. These volunteers and corporate donations helped schools to increase achievement scores, to increase school attendance, to provide work-based learning, and job placement. Other trends included funding a school for more than one year. It appeared that those schools with other demonstrable funding got more money. Few resources are available to either corporations or schools to learn about development of the partner relationship. Recommendations for corporations and schools included cross training so schools and corporations could share outcomes that create a well-trained and productive workforce.
590 $a School code: 0208.
650 4 $a Business Administration, General. $3 1017457
650 4 $a Business Administration, Marketing. $3 1017573
650 4 $a Education, Administration. $3 626645
690 $a 0310
690 $a 0338
690 $a 0514
710 2 0 $a University of Southern California. $3 700129
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 62-06A.
790 $a 0208
790 1 0 $a Gothold, Stuart E., $e advisor
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2000
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3018021