東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Relevance criterion choices in relat...

Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick., Graduate School - New Brunswick.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Relevance criterion choices in relation to search progress.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Relevance criterion choices in relation to search progress./
作者:	Taylor, Arthur.
面頁冊數:	220 p.
附註:	Adviser: Tefko Saracevic.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International70-03A.
標題:	Library Science. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3350143
ISBN:	9781109072433

Relevance criterion choices in relation to search progress.
Taylor, Arthur.

Relevance criterion choices in relation to search progress. - 220 p.

Adviser: Tefko Saracevic.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick, 2009.

Relevance as an information science concept is at the center of human information behavior. Relevance judgments occur within an information search process, where time, context and situation can impact relevance judgments. The determination of relevance is dependent on a number of factors and variables which include the criteria used to make relevance judgments. Research has shown that relevance judgments are dynamic, varying among user's evaluating the same document, and varying by user for the same document over the course of the information search process. Research has suggested that the criteria used to make these relevance judgments may also be dynamic. Understanding which relevance criteria are chosen and when they are chosen during the information search process can provide important information about the dynamic relevance judgment process and inform the development of information retrieval systems.

ISBN: 9781109072433Subjects--Topical Terms:

881164
Library Science.

Relevance criterion choices in relation to search progress.
LDR:03076nmm 2200289 a 45 001 886863
005 20101013
008 101013s2009 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781109072433
035 $a (UMI)AAI3350143
035 $a AAI3350143
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Taylor, Arthur. $3 1058580
245 1 0 $a Relevance criterion choices in relation to search progress.
300 $a 220 p.
500 $a Adviser: Tefko Saracevic.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-03, Section: A, page: 0726.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick, 2009.
520 $a Relevance as an information science concept is at the center of human information behavior. Relevance judgments occur within an information search process, where time, context and situation can impact relevance judgments. The determination of relevance is dependent on a number of factors and variables which include the criteria used to make relevance judgments. Research has shown that relevance judgments are dynamic, varying among user's evaluating the same document, and varying by user for the same document over the course of the information search process. Research has suggested that the criteria used to make these relevance judgments may also be dynamic. Understanding which relevance criteria are chosen and when they are chosen during the information search process can provide important information about the dynamic relevance judgment process and inform the development of information retrieval systems.
520 $a The purpose of this exploratory research is to examine the importance of the criteria used by searchers to make relevance judgments over the course of an information search process. The goal is to determine if users' choices of criteria, and the importance of those criteria change over the course of an information search process.
520 $a This research encompasses three separate studies which examined a subject's relevance judgment and the criteria used to make that judgment over the course of an information search process. Subjects were asked to search for information, evaluate documents, and then make relevance judgments for those documents. They were then asked about their relevance judgment, where they were in their search process when they made that judgment, and which criteria were used to make that judgment. Statistical analysis was used to examine these results. Findings include consistent selections of criteria across three distinct studies, and a statistically significant relationship between criteria choices and stage in the information search process. Sets of criteria choices were also examined and statistically significant relationships between sets of criteria and stage in the information search process were also detected.
590 $a School code: 0190.
650 4 $a Library Science. $3 881164
690 $a 0399
710 2 $a Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick. $b Graduate School - New Brunswick. $3 1019196
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 70-03A.
790 $a 0190
790 1 0 $a Saracevic, Tefko, $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2009
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3350143