東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

An exploration of the relationship b...

Regent University.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

An exploration of the relationship between moral reasoning and leadership style of athletic team coaches.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	An exploration of the relationship between moral reasoning and leadership style of athletic team coaches./
作者:	Webb, Matthew T.
面頁冊數:	132 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 69-08, Section: A, page: 3069.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International69-08A.
標題:	Business Administration, Management. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3325540
ISBN:	9780549769125

An exploration of the relationship between moral reasoning and leadership style of athletic team coaches.
Webb, Matthew T.

An exploration of the relationship between moral reasoning and leadership style of athletic team coaches. - 132 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 69-08, Section: A, page: 3069.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Regent University, 2008.

The purpose of this study was to examine the predictive relationship of moral reasoning ability upon leadership style. It was hypothesized that there is a positive relationship between moral reasoning ability (as demonstrated by justice, honesty, and responsibility) and transformational leadership (idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, and individualized consideration). It was also hypothesized that there is a negative relationship between moral reasoning and transactional leadership (contingent reward and management by exception). A nonexperimental quantitative research design was utilized to test the hypotheses. The independent variables (justice, honesty, and responsibility) were measured using the Hahm--Beller Values Choice Inventory (HBVCI; Hahm, Beller, & Stoll, 1989), a self-report instrument specifically designed for measuring moral reasoning in the athletic context. The dependent variables (dimensions of both transformational and transactional leadership) were measured using the leader self-report form of the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ; Avolio & Bass, 1995). Hierarchical multiple regression analyses of data collected from 163 participants partially supported one of the eight hypotheses (honesty significantly predicts inspirational motivation) but did not support any of the remaining hypothesized relationships between the independent and dependent variables. Results indicated that for this sample group, moral reasoning ability of coaches is not predictive of leadership style. Suggestions are offered as to why the data did not support the majority of the hypothesized relationships. The implications of this study as well as the limitations of this study and recommendations for future research are presented.

ISBN: 9780549769125Subjects--Topical Terms:

626628
Business Administration, Management.

An exploration of the relationship between moral reasoning and leadership style of athletic team coaches.
LDR:02653nmm 2200277 a 45 001 886527
005 20101007
008 101007s2008 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780549769125
035 $a (UMI)AAI3325540
035 $a AAI3325540
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Webb, Matthew T. $3 1058226
245 1 3 $a An exploration of the relationship between moral reasoning and leadership style of athletic team coaches.
300 $a 132 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 69-08, Section: A, page: 3069.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Regent University, 2008.
520 $a The purpose of this study was to examine the predictive relationship of moral reasoning ability upon leadership style. It was hypothesized that there is a positive relationship between moral reasoning ability (as demonstrated by justice, honesty, and responsibility) and transformational leadership (idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, and individualized consideration). It was also hypothesized that there is a negative relationship between moral reasoning and transactional leadership (contingent reward and management by exception). A nonexperimental quantitative research design was utilized to test the hypotheses. The independent variables (justice, honesty, and responsibility) were measured using the Hahm--Beller Values Choice Inventory (HBVCI; Hahm, Beller, & Stoll, 1989), a self-report instrument specifically designed for measuring moral reasoning in the athletic context. The dependent variables (dimensions of both transformational and transactional leadership) were measured using the leader self-report form of the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ; Avolio & Bass, 1995). Hierarchical multiple regression analyses of data collected from 163 participants partially supported one of the eight hypotheses (honesty significantly predicts inspirational motivation) but did not support any of the remaining hypothesized relationships between the independent and dependent variables. Results indicated that for this sample group, moral reasoning ability of coaches is not predictive of leadership style. Suggestions are offered as to why the data did not support the majority of the hypothesized relationships. The implications of this study as well as the limitations of this study and recommendations for future research are presented.
590 $a School code: 1058.
650 4 $a Business Administration, Management. $3 626628
650 4 $a Education, Higher. $3 543175
650 4 $a Education, Philosophy of. $3 783746
650 4 $a Education, Physical. $3 1018000
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0523
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0998
710 2 $a Regent University. $3 1019258
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 69-08A.
790 $a 1058
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2008
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3325540