東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Effects of contrast polarity between...

California State University, Long Beach.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Effects of contrast polarity between background and foreground in air traffic control displays for time-to-contact judgments.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Effects of contrast polarity between background and foreground in air traffic control displays for time-to-contact judgments./
作者:	Dion, Marshall E.
面頁冊數:	57 p.
附註:	Adviser: Thomas Z. Strybel.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International46-02.
標題:	Engineering, Aerospace. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1448201
ISBN:	9780549213505

Effects of contrast polarity between background and foreground in air traffic control displays for time-to-contact judgments.
Dion, Marshall E.

Effects of contrast polarity between background and foreground in air traffic control displays for time-to-contact judgments. - 57 p.

Adviser: Thomas Z. Strybel.

Thesis (M.S.)--California State University, Long Beach, 2007.

For time-to-contact predictions, an air traffic controller must first identify the location of the point of intersection. In a pilot study, Dion showed the initial judgment task of locating the intersection point can be affected by contrast scheme, but did not incorporate motion into the task (locating two line segments' intersection point). The present research compares the 2 contrast schemes by utilizing a prediction task similar to the Law, Pellegrino, Mitchell, Fischer, McDonald and Hunt, arrival-time judgment task (participant predicted which object arrived first) with two objects moving to a contact point by having one of the objects set to reach its contact point first with the display stopping when the objects were two-thirds the way to the given contact point to investigate prediction of motion. Accuracy in the task was calculated as percentage correct and was submitted to a 5-way and 6-way mixed-design ANOVA in order to examine the "closer arrives first" bias shown by participants in Law et al. The results are discussed in conjunction with the previous research of Law et al. and in regards to the present study's hypothesis of contrast polarity. There was no difference in participants' performance in identifying which object will arrive first in the negative and positive contrast polarity conditions. Even though there was no effect of contrast polarity, a marginal contrast polarity x configuration x arrival time differential (ATD) interaction, F(4, 40) = 2.50, p = .06, and a marginal contrast polarity x winning object x velocity ratio x ATD x gender interaction, F(2, 20) = 2.76, p = .09, were shown. Design recommendations and future implications are discussed.

ISBN: 9780549213505Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018395
Engineering, Aerospace.

Effects of contrast polarity between background and foreground in air traffic control displays for time-to-contact judgments.
LDR:02664nmm 2200301 a 45 001 886048
005 20101006
008 101006s2007 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780549213505
035 $a (UMI)AAI1448201
035 $a AAI1448201
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Dion, Marshall E. $3 1057713
245 1 0 $a Effects of contrast polarity between background and foreground in air traffic control displays for time-to-contact judgments.
300 $a 57 p.
500 $a Adviser: Thomas Z. Strybel.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 46-02, page: 1147.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--California State University, Long Beach, 2007.
520 $a For time-to-contact predictions, an air traffic controller must first identify the location of the point of intersection. In a pilot study, Dion showed the initial judgment task of locating the intersection point can be affected by contrast scheme, but did not incorporate motion into the task (locating two line segments' intersection point). The present research compares the 2 contrast schemes by utilizing a prediction task similar to the Law, Pellegrino, Mitchell, Fischer, McDonald and Hunt, arrival-time judgment task (participant predicted which object arrived first) with two objects moving to a contact point by having one of the objects set to reach its contact point first with the display stopping when the objects were two-thirds the way to the given contact point to investigate prediction of motion. Accuracy in the task was calculated as percentage correct and was submitted to a 5-way and 6-way mixed-design ANOVA in order to examine the "closer arrives first" bias shown by participants in Law et al. The results are discussed in conjunction with the previous research of Law et al. and in regards to the present study's hypothesis of contrast polarity. There was no difference in participants' performance in identifying which object will arrive first in the negative and positive contrast polarity conditions. Even though there was no effect of contrast polarity, a marginal contrast polarity x configuration x arrival time differential (ATD) interaction, F(4, 40) = 2.50, p = .06, and a marginal contrast polarity x winning object x velocity ratio x ATD x gender interaction, F(2, 20) = 2.76, p = .09, were shown. Design recommendations and future implications are discussed.
590 $a School code: 6080.
650 4 $a Engineering, Aerospace. $3 1018395
650 4 $a Engineering, System Science. $3 1018128
650 4 $a Psychology, Cognitive. $3 1017810
650 4 $a Psychology, Industrial. $3 520063
690 $a 0538
690 $a 0624
690 $a 0633
690 $a 0790
710 2 $a California State University, Long Beach. $3 1017843
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 46-02.
790 $a 6080
790 1 0 $a Strybel, Thomas Z., $e advisor
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2007
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1448201