東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Respectful vagueness: The continual...

University of Calgary (Canada).

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Respectful vagueness: The continual utility of strategic ambiguity as the primary deterrent to conflict in the Taiwan Strait.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Respectful vagueness: The continual utility of strategic ambiguity as the primary deterrent to conflict in the Taiwan Strait./
作者:	Fung, Derek Raymond.
面頁冊數:	159 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 46-06, page: 3072.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International46-06.
標題:	History, Asia, Australia and Oceania. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoeng/servlet/advanced?query=MR38125
ISBN:	9780494381250

Respectful vagueness: The continual utility of strategic ambiguity as the primary deterrent to conflict in the Taiwan Strait.
Fung, Derek Raymond.

Respectful vagueness: The continual utility of strategic ambiguity as the primary deterrent to conflict in the Taiwan Strait. - 159 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 46-06, page: 3072.

Thesis (M.S.S.)--University of Calgary (Canada), 2008.

Since the 1970s, strategic ambiguity, the deterrence conflict through vagueness and imprecision in diplomacy, as well as possible military intervention, has played an integral part in the preservation of peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait. However, with the inauguration of George W. Bush, this method of conflict management has come under much criticism from those who favour the replacement of ambiguity with a more clear and concise formula. To these advocates of strategic clarity, ambiguity has outlived its usefulness and is consequently an impediment towards prospects for a peaceful resolution. This thesis will argue that such an approach is incorrect. Strategic ambiguity's method of deterrence is not only superior to the methodologies proposed by the advocates of strategic clarity, but is currently the only means to achieve successful deterrence. Only through the intrinsic flexibility of ambiguity are the goals and objectives of United States, the People's Republic of China and Taiwan successfully balanced.

ISBN: 9780494381250Subjects--Topical Terms:

626624
History, Asia, Australia and Oceania.

Respectful vagueness: The continual utility of strategic ambiguity as the primary deterrent to conflict in the Taiwan Strait.
LDR:01904nmm 2200277 a 45 001 874624
005 20100825
008 100825s2008 eng d
020 $a 9780494381250
035 $a (UMI)AAIMR38125
035 $a AAIMR38125
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Fung, Derek Raymond. $3 1043917
245 1 0 $a Respectful vagueness: The continual utility of strategic ambiguity as the primary deterrent to conflict in the Taiwan Strait.
300 $a 159 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 46-06, page: 3072.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.S.)--University of Calgary (Canada), 2008.
520 $a Since the 1970s, strategic ambiguity, the deterrence conflict through vagueness and imprecision in diplomacy, as well as possible military intervention, has played an integral part in the preservation of peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait. However, with the inauguration of George W. Bush, this method of conflict management has come under much criticism from those who favour the replacement of ambiguity with a more clear and concise formula. To these advocates of strategic clarity, ambiguity has outlived its usefulness and is consequently an impediment towards prospects for a peaceful resolution. This thesis will argue that such an approach is incorrect. Strategic ambiguity's method of deterrence is not only superior to the methodologies proposed by the advocates of strategic clarity, but is currently the only means to achieve successful deterrence. Only through the intrinsic flexibility of ambiguity are the goals and objectives of United States, the People's Republic of China and Taiwan successfully balanced.
590 $a School code: 0026.
650 4 $a History, Asia, Australia and Oceania. $3 626624
650 4 $a Military Studies. $3 1017606
650 4 $a Political Science, General. $3 1017391
650 4 $a Political Science, International Law and Relations. $3 1017399
690 $a 0332
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0616
690 $a 0750
710 2 0 $a University of Calgary (Canada). $3 1017619
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 46-06.
790 $a 0026
791 $a M.S.S.
792 $a 2008
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoeng/servlet/advanced?query=MR38125