東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Practical reasoning and the varietie...

Stanford University.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Practical reasoning and the varieties of agency.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Practical reasoning and the varieties of agency./
作者:	Morton, Jennifer M.
面頁冊數:	280 p.
附註:	Adviser: Michael E. Bratman.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International69-05A.
標題:	Philosophy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3313628
ISBN:	9780549624066

Practical reasoning and the varieties of agency.
Morton, Jennifer M.

Practical reasoning and the varieties of agency. - 280 p.

Adviser: Michael E. Bratman.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Stanford University, 2008.

In deciding what to do, we assess the reasons we have for different courses of action and form an intention on the basis of those reasons. Our deliberation in such cases is structured by norms of rationality; the central ones tell us to take the means to our ends, to not intend incompatible states of affairs, and to not reconsider our intentions unless new considerations come to light. My thesis concerns the grounding of these norms: what is their justification and why are they binding on us?

ISBN: 9780549624066Subjects--Topical Terms:

516511
Philosophy.

Practical reasoning and the varieties of agency.
LDR:02016nam 2200277 a 45 001 862327
005 20100720
008 100720s2008 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780549624066
035 $a (UMI)AAI3313628
035 $a AAI3313628
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Morton, Jennifer M. $3 1030127
245 1 0 $a Practical reasoning and the varieties of agency.
300 $a 280 p.
500 $a Adviser: Michael E. Bratman.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 69-05, Section: A, page: 1814.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Stanford University, 2008.
520 $a In deciding what to do, we assess the reasons we have for different courses of action and form an intention on the basis of those reasons. Our deliberation in such cases is structured by norms of rationality; the central ones tell us to take the means to our ends, to not intend incompatible states of affairs, and to not reconsider our intentions unless new considerations come to light. My thesis concerns the grounding of these norms: what is their justification and why are they binding on us?
520 $a I offer a pragmatic account of the foundation of these norms that avoids the usual worries of circularity and redundancy. In my theory, the norms of rational deliberation are dependent on their effectiveness and take into account the agent's psychology and environment. My theory stands in contrast to theories on which these norms are a priori, necessary, and universal for all agents. In the second part, I argue that for adult human agents, we should understand the ends with respect to which we measure effectiveness as given by our cares. It in our commitment to promoting the well-being of what we care for that grounds our commitment to deliberating rationally.
590 $a School code: 0212.
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
690 $a 0422
710 2 $a Stanford University. $3 754827
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 69-05A.
790 $a 0212
790 1 0 $a Bratman, Michael E., $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2008
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3313628