東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Web 2.0 definition, usage, and self-...

The University of Alabama., Educational Leadership.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Web 2.0 definition, usage, and self-efficacy: A study of graduate library school students and academic librarians at colleges and universities with ALA accredited degree programs.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Web 2.0 definition, usage, and self-efficacy: A study of graduate library school students and academic librarians at colleges and universities with ALA accredited degree programs./
作者:	Davis, Clay.
面頁冊數:	271 p.
附註:	Adviser: Margaret L. Rice.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International70-05A.
標題:	Education, Higher. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoeng/servlet/advanced?query=3358582
ISBN:	9781109170566

Web 2.0 definition, usage, and self-efficacy: A study of graduate library school students and academic librarians at colleges and universities with ALA accredited degree programs.
Davis, Clay.

Web 2.0 definition, usage, and self-efficacy: A study of graduate library school students and academic librarians at colleges and universities with ALA accredited degree programs. - 271 p.

Adviser: Margaret L. Rice.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Alabama, 2009.

The topic of Web 2.0 has been studied several times within the field of library science, but there are several areas that warrant additional research: (a) examining definition of Web 2.0; and (b) providing baseline descriptive data for Web 2.0 usage; and (c) addressing psychometric concerns with measures of self-efficacy of Web 2.0; and (d) investigating the predictive quality of Web 2.0 self-efficacy towards Web 2.0 use within the aforementioned parameters for both Academic Library Association Accredited graduate library school students (students) and academic librarians (librarians) at institutions with Academic Library Association Accredited graduate library schools. These concerns formed the basis of this dissertation research.

ISBN: 9781109170566Subjects--Topical Terms:

543175
Education, Higher.

Web 2.0 definition, usage, and self-efficacy: A study of graduate library school students and academic librarians at colleges and universities with ALA accredited degree programs.
LDR:03663nam 2200349 a 45 001 860631
005 20100715
008 100715s2009 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781109170566
035 $a (UMI)AAI3358582
035 $a AAI3358582
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Davis, Clay. $3 1016905
245 1 0 $a Web 2.0 definition, usage, and self-efficacy: A study of graduate library school students and academic librarians at colleges and universities with ALA accredited degree programs.
300 $a 271 p.
500 $a Adviser: Margaret L. Rice.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-05, Section: A, page: .
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Alabama, 2009.
520 $a The topic of Web 2.0 has been studied several times within the field of library science, but there are several areas that warrant additional research: (a) examining definition of Web 2.0; and (b) providing baseline descriptive data for Web 2.0 usage; and (c) addressing psychometric concerns with measures of self-efficacy of Web 2.0; and (d) investigating the predictive quality of Web 2.0 self-efficacy towards Web 2.0 use within the aforementioned parameters for both Academic Library Association Accredited graduate library school students (students) and academic librarians (librarians) at institutions with Academic Library Association Accredited graduate library schools. These concerns formed the basis of this dissertation research.
520 $a Data were collected from two populations: ALA accredited graduate library school students at all the ALA accredited graduate library school students (N = 6232), and academic librarians from institutions with ALA accredited graduate library schools (N = 2601). This research resulted in the creation of a Web 2.0 definition instrument, a Web 2.0 usage instrument, and 7 Web 2.0 self-efficacy tool instruments. Each instrument extracts information about Web 2.0 as it pertains to library science. Since Web 2.0 is such a broad topic, seven of the Web 2.0 tools were chosen for concentration within this research. Overall results from definition indicate that the strongest agreement toward definition of Web 2.0 was the term "information sharing", whereas librarians felt that "user-centered-web" was a more suitable definition, and students felt that "information sharing" was a more suitable definition for Web 2.0. Overall Web 2.0 was being used among the library science population (at least 1 hour per week for social networking). With regard to self-efficacy toward Web 2.0, students mean self-efficacy items ranged from 2.35 (understanding of rss validation), to 4.49 (understanding why people use social networking sites), whereas librarians mean self-efficacy items ranged from 2.47 (ability to validate rss) to 4.35 (understanding of why people use wikis). Results showed that Web 2.0 self efficacy was not a predictor of Web 2.0 usage. Finally, this research provided baseline data for future research in Web 2.0 for library science. The results suggest that library science educators and library science practitioners may want to consider how Web 2.0 can be incorporated into library science.
590 $a School code: 0004.
650 4 $a Education, Higher. $3 543175
650 4 $a Education, Technology of. $3 1018012
650 4 $a Library Science. $3 881164
690 $a 0399
690 $a 0710
690 $a 0745
710 2 $a The University of Alabama. $b Educational Leadership. $3 1028229
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 70-05A.
790 $a 0004
790 1 0 $a Coleman, Gordon $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Hartman, Julia $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Rice, Margaret L., $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Robinson, Cecil $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Wright, Vivian $e committee member
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2009
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoeng/servlet/advanced?query=3358582