東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Assessment of suspended dust from pi...

Texas A&M University.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Assessment of suspended dust from pipe rattling operations.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Assessment of suspended dust from pipe rattling operations./
Author:	Park, Ju-Myon.
Description:	218 p.
Notes:	Adviser: James C. Rock.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International67-08B.
Subject:	Engineering, Environmental. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoeng/servlet/advanced?query=3231570
ISBN:	9780542840289

Assessment of suspended dust from pipe rattling operations.
Park, Ju-Myon.

Assessment of suspended dust from pipe rattling operations. - 218 p.

Adviser: James C. Rock.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Texas A&M University, 2005.

Six types of aerosol samplers were evaluated experimentally in a test chamber with polydisperse fly ash. The Andersen sampler overestimates the mass of small particles due to particle bounce between stages and therefore provides a conservative estimate of respirable particulate mass and thoracic particulate mass. The TSP sampler provides an unbiased estimate of total particulate mass. TSP/CCM provides no information below ESD 2 mum and therefore underestimates respirable particulate mass. The PM10 sampler provides a reasonable estimate of the thoracic particulate fraction. The RespiCon sampler provides an unbiased estimate of respirable, thoracic, and inhalable fractions. DustTrak and SidePak monitors provide relative particle concentrations instead of absolute concentrations because it could not be calibrated for absolute particle concentrations with varying particle shape, composition, and density.

ISBN: 9780542840289Subjects--Topical Terms:

783782
Engineering, Environmental.

Assessment of suspended dust from pipe rattling operations.
LDR:03116nam 2200313 a 45 001 858143
005 20100712
008 100712s2005 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780542840289
035 $a (UMI)AAI3231570
035 $a AAI3231570
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Park, Ju-Myon. $3 1025175
245 1 0 $a Assessment of suspended dust from pipe rattling operations.
300 $a 218 p.
500 $a Adviser: James C. Rock.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-08, Section: B, page: 4650.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Texas A&M University, 2005.
520 $a Six types of aerosol samplers were evaluated experimentally in a test chamber with polydisperse fly ash. The Andersen sampler overestimates the mass of small particles due to particle bounce between stages and therefore provides a conservative estimate of respirable particulate mass and thoracic particulate mass. The TSP sampler provides an unbiased estimate of total particulate mass. TSP/CCM provides no information below ESD 2 mum and therefore underestimates respirable particulate mass. The PM10 sampler provides a reasonable estimate of the thoracic particulate fraction. The RespiCon sampler provides an unbiased estimate of respirable, thoracic, and inhalable fractions. DustTrak and SidePak monitors provide relative particle concentrations instead of absolute concentrations because it could not be calibrated for absolute particle concentrations with varying particle shape, composition, and density.
520 $a Six sampler technologies were used to evaluate airborne dust concentrations released from oilfield pipe rattling operations. The task sampled was the removal of scale deposited on the inner wall of the pipe before it was removed from service in a producing well.
520 $a The measured mass concentrations of the aerosol samplers show that a Gaussian plume model is applicable to the data of pipe rattling operations for finding an attainment area. It is estimated that workers who remain within 1 m of the machine centerline and directly downwind have an 8-hour TWA exposure opportunity of (13.3 +/- 9.7) mg/m3 for the Mud Lake pipe scale and (11.4 +/- 9.7) mg/m3 for the Lake Sand pipe scale at 95% confidence. At distances more than 4 m downwind from the machine centerline, dust concentrations are below the TWA-TLV of 10 mg/m3 for the worker in both scales. At positions crosswind or upwind from the machine centerline there is no measurable exposure. Available data suggest that the attainment area for the public starts at about 9 m downwind from the machine centerline in both scales, as 24 hour average concentrations at these distances are smaller than the 0.15 mg/m3, the NAAQS for unrestricted public access. The PSD of the suspended plume is dominated by particles smaller than ESD 50 mum.
590 $a School code: 0803.
650 4 $a Engineering, Environmental. $3 783782
650 4 $a Engineering, Materials Science. $3 1017759
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Occupational Health and Safety. $3 1017799
690 $a 0354
690 $a 0775
690 $a 0794
710 2 $a Texas A&M University. $3 718977
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 67-08B.
790 $a 0803
790 1 0 $a Rock, James C., $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoeng/servlet/advanced?query=3231570