東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Ethics by committee = a history of r...

Jacobs, Noortje.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Ethics by committee = a history of reasoning together about medicine, science, society, and the state /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Ethics by committee/ Noortje Jacobs.
其他題名:	a history of reasoning together about medicine, science, society, and the state /
作者:	Jacobs, Noortje.
出版者:	Chicago :University of Chicago Press, : 2022.,
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (264 p.) :ill.
內容註:	Internal control. A moral obligation to medical progress ; A moral need for epistemic filters -- External control. Medical ethics in a modern society ; Experimenting with humans -- Public accountability. The contested rise of the ethical expert ; Public governance in a pluralistic society.
標題:	Institutional review boards (Medicine) - History - 20th century. - Netherlands -
電子資源:	https://www.degruyterbrill.com/isbn/9780226819310
ISBN:	9780226819310

Ethics by committee = a history of reasoning together about medicine, science, society, and the state /
Jacobs, Noortje.

Ethics by committeea history of reasoning together about medicine, science, society, and the state /[electronic resource] :Noortje Jacobs. - 1st ed. - Chicago :University of Chicago Press,2022. - 1 online resource (264 p.) :ill.

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Internal control. A moral obligation to medical progress ; A moral need for epistemic filters -- External control. Medical ethics in a modern society ; Experimenting with humans -- Public accountability. The contested rise of the ethical expert ; Public governance in a pluralistic society.

"Ethics boards have become obligatory passage points in today's medical science, and we forget how novel they really are. The use of humans in experiments is an age-old practice that records show goes back to at least the third century BC and, since the early modern period, as a practice it has become increasingly popular. Yet, in most countries around the world, hardly any formal checks and balances existed to govern the communal oversight of experiments involving human subjects until at least the 1960s. Ethics by Committee traces the rise of ethics boards for human experimentation in the second half of the twentieth century. Using the Netherlands as a case-study, Noortje Jacobs shows how the authority of physicians to make decisions about clinical research gave way in most developed nations to formal mechanisms of communal decision-making that served to regiment the behavior of individual researchers. This historically unprecedented change in scientific governance came out of a growing international wariness of medical research in the decades after World War II. Research ethics committees were originally intended not only to make human experimentation more ethical but also to raise its epistemic quality. By examining complex negotiations over the appropriate governance of human subjects research, Ethics by Committee advances our understanding not only of the history of research ethics and the randomized controlled trial but also, more broadly, of how liberal democracies in the late twentieth century have sought to resolve public concerns over charged issues in medicine and science"--

Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.

In English.

ISBN: 9780226819310

Standard No.: 10.7208/chicago/9780226819310doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

3795417
Institutional review boards (Medicine)
--History--Netherlands--20th century.

LC Class. No.: R852.5 / .J33 2022

Dewey Class. No.: 174.209492

National Library of Medicine Call No.: W 20.55.E7

Ethics by committee = a history of reasoning together about medicine, science, society, and the state /
LDR:03130cmm a2200337 a 4500 001 2416591
003 DE-B1597
005 20251017072503.0
006 m o d
007 cr cnu---unuuu
008 260303s2022 ilua ob 001 0 eng d
020 $a 9780226819310 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $z 9780226819327 $q (paperback)
020 $z 9780226819303 $q (hardcover)
024 7 $a 10.7208/chicago/9780226819310 $2 doi
035 $a 9780226819310
040 $a DE-B1597 $b eng $c DE-B1597
041 0 $a eng
050 0 0 $a R852.5 $b .J33 2022
060 4 $a W 20.55.E7
082 0 0 $a 174.209492 $2 23
100 1 $a Jacobs, Noortje. $3 3795416
245 1 0 $a Ethics by committee $h [electronic resource] : $b a history of reasoning together about medicine, science, society, and the state / $c Noortje Jacobs.
250 $a 1st ed.
260 $a Chicago : $b University of Chicago Press, $c 2022.
300 $a 1 online resource (264 p.) : $b ill.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references and index.
505 0 $a Internal control. A moral obligation to medical progress ; A moral need for epistemic filters -- External control. Medical ethics in a modern society ; Experimenting with humans -- Public accountability. The contested rise of the ethical expert ; Public governance in a pluralistic society.
520 $a "Ethics boards have become obligatory passage points in today's medical science, and we forget how novel they really are. The use of humans in experiments is an age-old practice that records show goes back to at least the third century BC and, since the early modern period, as a practice it has become increasingly popular. Yet, in most countries around the world, hardly any formal checks and balances existed to govern the communal oversight of experiments involving human subjects until at least the 1960s. Ethics by Committee traces the rise of ethics boards for human experimentation in the second half of the twentieth century. Using the Netherlands as a case-study, Noortje Jacobs shows how the authority of physicians to make decisions about clinical research gave way in most developed nations to formal mechanisms of communal decision-making that served to regiment the behavior of individual researchers. This historically unprecedented change in scientific governance came out of a growing international wariness of medical research in the decades after World War II. Research ethics committees were originally intended not only to make human experimentation more ethical but also to raise its epistemic quality. By examining complex negotiations over the appropriate governance of human subjects research, Ethics by Committee advances our understanding not only of the history of research ethics and the randomized controlled trial but also, more broadly, of how liberal democracies in the late twentieth century have sought to resolve public concerns over charged issues in medicine and science"-- $c Provided by publisher.
538 $a Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
546 $a In English.
588 $a Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed September 18 2025)
650 0 $a Institutional review boards (Medicine) $z Netherlands $x History $y 20th century. $3 3795417
650 0 $a Medical ethics committees $z Netherlands $x History $y 20th century. $3 3795418
650 0 $a Human experimentation in medicine $z Netherlands $x History $y 20th century. $3 3795419
650 0 $a Medicine $x Research $x Government policy $z Netherlands $x History $y 20th century. $3 3795420
650 0 $a Medical ethics $z Netherlands $x History $y 20th century. $3 3795421
650 0 $a Medicine $x Research $x Moral and ethical aspects. $3 766841
650 1 2 $a Ethics Committees, Research $x history. $3 3795422
650 1 2 $a Ethical Review $x history. $3 3795423
650 1 2 $a Human Experimentation $x ethics. $3 813942
650 1 2 $a Human Experimentation $x history. $3 3795424
650 1 2 $a Ethics, Research $x history. $3 3795425
650 2 2 $a History, 20th Century. $3 615063
856 4 0 $u https://www.degruyterbrill.com/isbn/9780226819310