東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

College Students With Learning Disab...

Cartwright, Rose.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

College Students With Learning Disabilities and Their Judgments About Issues of Access, Equity, and Inclusion.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	College Students With Learning Disabilities and Their Judgments About Issues of Access, Equity, and Inclusion./
作者:	Cartwright, Rose.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2024,
面頁冊數:	117 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-03, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International86-03B.
標題:	Educational psychology. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31294409
ISBN:	9798384452331

College Students With Learning Disabilities and Their Judgments About Issues of Access, Equity, and Inclusion.
Cartwright, Rose.

College Students With Learning Disabilities and Their Judgments About Issues of Access, Equity, and Inclusion. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024 - 117 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-03, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Berkeley, 2024.

The representation and understanding of students with disabilities and their experiences in higher education-as in many of our social institutions-is gradually evolving, but there is much work to be done. An emergent body of large survey-based research, complemented by smaller ethnographic studies, has shed light on the trajectories, needs, and perspectives of this growing student population. Still, there have been relatively few empirical approaches to examining such students' specific evaluations and interpretations of everyday institutional and social interactions involving disability; even less research is well-grounded in compelling psychological data.This study explored how undergraduate students with documented, non-visible learning disabilities (LDs) reason about anti-discrimination legislation and interpersonal issues involving equity, inclusion, and access in the university setting. The research utilized theoretical approaches and empirical findings from the fields of social cognitive developmental psychology and disability studies as a conceptual foundation and employed both semi-structured and open-ended clinical interview methods to examine how undergraduates with LDs (a) evaluated the general acceptability of disability anti-discrimination legislation as well as hypothetical instances of disability-related interactions in the university setting; and (b) reasoned about their evaluations. In a second interview segment, participants were also asked semi-structured autobiographical questions about undesired disability-related interactions in the university setting, followed by questions about their evaluations of those experiences and their thoughts about institutional changes that might prevent future such occurrences. Interviews concluded with an open-ended question about participants' general reflections on their experiences as college students with LDs. Interviews were analyzed and interpreted via adapted coding schemes previously developed within the social domain theory empirical tradition.The study included a total of 33 participants (Mage = 21.03, SDage = 2.08; n = 27 cisgender women), all of whom were enrolled in undergraduate coursework at a large public university and who self-identified as having a formally documented LD. Results indicated that disability anti-discrimination legislation is consistently affirmed for moral reasons such as equality, equity, and welfare, while judgements and reasoning about nuanced interpersonal experiences (both hypothetical and autobiographical) involve the coordination of myriad priorities, including moral (i.e., justice, welfare, rights), social conventional (i.e., social functioning, authority), personal (i.e., autonomy, choice, personal prerogative), prudential (i.e., one's own safety, comfort, or health), and other (e.g., integration, disability identity) considerations. Ideas about institutional change and reflections on lived experience range from seeking compassion and respect in dyadic interactions to widescale systemic efforts focused on disability and mental health awareness as well as equitable, best practices in instruction and accommodation.{A0}

ISBN: 9798384452331Subjects--Topical Terms:

517650
Educational psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

College students

College Students With Learning Disabilities and Their Judgments About Issues of Access, Equity, and Inclusion.
LDR:04483nmm a2200421 4500 001 2404509
005 20241213095554.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2024 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798384452331
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI31294409
035 $a AAI31294409
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Cartwright, Rose. $3 3774824
245 1 0 $a College Students With Learning Disabilities and Their Judgments About Issues of Access, Equity, and Inclusion.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 117 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-03, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Turiel, Elliot.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Berkeley, 2024.
520 $a The representation and understanding of students with disabilities and their experiences in higher education-as in many of our social institutions-is gradually evolving, but there is much work to be done. An emergent body of large survey-based research, complemented by smaller ethnographic studies, has shed light on the trajectories, needs, and perspectives of this growing student population. Still, there have been relatively few empirical approaches to examining such students' specific evaluations and interpretations of everyday institutional and social interactions involving disability; even less research is well-grounded in compelling psychological data.This study explored how undergraduate students with documented, non-visible learning disabilities (LDs) reason about anti-discrimination legislation and interpersonal issues involving equity, inclusion, and access in the university setting. The research utilized theoretical approaches and empirical findings from the fields of social cognitive developmental psychology and disability studies as a conceptual foundation and employed both semi-structured and open-ended clinical interview methods to examine how undergraduates with LDs (a) evaluated the general acceptability of disability anti-discrimination legislation as well as hypothetical instances of disability-related interactions in the university setting; and (b) reasoned about their evaluations. In a second interview segment, participants were also asked semi-structured autobiographical questions about undesired disability-related interactions in the university setting, followed by questions about their evaluations of those experiences and their thoughts about institutional changes that might prevent future such occurrences. Interviews concluded with an open-ended question about participants' general reflections on their experiences as college students with LDs. Interviews were analyzed and interpreted via adapted coding schemes previously developed within the social domain theory empirical tradition.The study included a total of 33 participants (Mage = 21.03, SDage = 2.08; n = 27 cisgender women), all of whom were enrolled in undergraduate coursework at a large public university and who self-identified as having a formally documented LD. Results indicated that disability anti-discrimination legislation is consistently affirmed for moral reasons such as equality, equity, and welfare, while judgements and reasoning about nuanced interpersonal experiences (both hypothetical and autobiographical) involve the coordination of myriad priorities, including moral (i.e., justice, welfare, rights), social conventional (i.e., social functioning, authority), personal (i.e., autonomy, choice, personal prerogative), prudential (i.e., one's own safety, comfort, or health), and other (e.g., integration, disability identity) considerations. Ideas about institutional change and reflections on lived experience range from seeking compassion and respect in dyadic interactions to widescale systemic efforts focused on disability and mental health awareness as well as equitable, best practices in instruction and accommodation.{A0}
590 $a School code: 0028.
650 4 $a Educational psychology. $3 517650
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 519075
650 4 $a Disability studies. $3 543687
650 4 $a Educational sociology. $3 519608
650 4 $a Social psychology. $3 520219
653 $a College students
653 $a Disability accommodations
653 $a Learning disabilities
653 $a Social reasoning
653 $a Social cognitive developmental psychology
653 $a Social domain theory
690 $a 0525
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0201
690 $a 0451
690 $a 0340
710 2 $a University of California, Berkeley. $b Education. $3 1670269
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 86-03B.
790 $a 0028
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2024
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31294409