東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The trouble with the Uniform Domain ...

Lamothe-Samson, Madeleine.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The trouble with the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP): Deconstructing common assumptions and developing a new approach to "cybersquatting".

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The trouble with the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP): Deconstructing common assumptions and developing a new approach to "cybersquatting"./
作者:	Lamothe-Samson, Madeleine.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2001,
面頁冊數:	173 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 63-09.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International63-09.
標題:	Law. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=MQ63082
ISBN:	9780612630826

The trouble with the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP): Deconstructing common assumptions and developing a new approach to "cybersquatting".
Lamothe-Samson, Madeleine.

The trouble with the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP): Deconstructing common assumptions and developing a new approach to "cybersquatting". - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2001 - 173 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 63-09.

Thesis (LL.M.)--University of Toronto (Canada), 2001.

This thesis challenges the association between cybersquatting and trademark infringement. It shows that only a small number of domain name/trademark disputes constitute trademark infringement, passing off or dilution as prohibited in Canada and the Unites States. It argues that it is a mistake to use trademark law to justify the granting of relief against "cybersquatting", because it amounts to an unjustified expansion of trademark owner's rights over the general public's freedom to use trademarks for non-trademark purposes. It then argues that in order to reduce the number of bad decisions under the ICANN's Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP), it is necessary to identify what exactly is wrong with cybersquatting. After concluding that none of the rationales most often put forward are truly satisfactory, this thesis suggests that the civil law doctrine of abuse of rights is a better legal framework for dispute resolution mechanisms like the UDRP.

ISBN: 9780612630826Subjects--Topical Terms:

600858
Law.

The trouble with the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP): Deconstructing common assumptions and developing a new approach to "cybersquatting".
LDR:02088nmm a2200337 4500 001 2402889
005 20241104055722.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2001 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780612630826
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAIMQ63082
035 $a AAIMQ63082
035 $a 2402889
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Lamothe-Samson, Madeleine. $3 3773144
245 1 0 $a The trouble with the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP): Deconstructing common assumptions and developing a new approach to "cybersquatting".
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2001
300 $a 173 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 63-09.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Drassinower, Abraham.
502 $a Thesis (LL.M.)--University of Toronto (Canada), 2001.
520 $a This thesis challenges the association between cybersquatting and trademark infringement. It shows that only a small number of domain name/trademark disputes constitute trademark infringement, passing off or dilution as prohibited in Canada and the Unites States. It argues that it is a mistake to use trademark law to justify the granting of relief against "cybersquatting", because it amounts to an unjustified expansion of trademark owner's rights over the general public's freedom to use trademarks for non-trademark purposes. It then argues that in order to reduce the number of bad decisions under the ICANN's Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP), it is necessary to identify what exactly is wrong with cybersquatting. After concluding that none of the rationales most often put forward are truly satisfactory, this thesis suggests that the civil law doctrine of abuse of rights is a better legal framework for dispute resolution mechanisms like the UDRP.
590 $a School code: 0779.
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Mass media. $3 516793
650 4 $a Mass communications. $3 3422380
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0708
710 2 $a University of Toronto (Canada). $3 1017674
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 63-09.
790 $a 0779
791 $a LL.M.
792 $a 2001
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=MQ63082