東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Towards Value Pluralism, Knowledge P...

Hoelting, Kristin R.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Towards Value Pluralism, Knowledge Pluralism, and Recognitional Justice: Improving Integration of Cultural Benefits of Ecosystem Services in Environmental Decision-Making.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Towards Value Pluralism, Knowledge Pluralism, and Recognitional Justice: Improving Integration of Cultural Benefits of Ecosystem Services in Environmental Decision-Making./
Author:	Hoelting, Kristin R.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2022,
Description:	347 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-07, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-07B.
Subject:	Natural resource management. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29993317
ISBN:	9798368427201

Towards Value Pluralism, Knowledge Pluralism, and Recognitional Justice: Improving Integration of Cultural Benefits of Ecosystem Services in Environmental Decision-Making.
Hoelting, Kristin R.

Towards Value Pluralism, Knowledge Pluralism, and Recognitional Justice: Improving Integration of Cultural Benefits of Ecosystem Services in Environmental Decision-Making. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2022 - 347 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-07, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Colorado State University, 2022.

This mainstreaming of the ecosystem services (ES) concept and approach is reflected in its adoption by governments and non-governmental organizations around the world, including in the United States: in 2015, a U.S. Federal Memorandum directed all Federal agencies to integrate ES information in their decision-making processes. In principle this momentum represents an opportunity for improved consideration of the cultural benefits of ES in decision-making, as part of the improved consideration of ES as a whole. However, there is concern that cultural benefits - and the plural values and multiple knowledge systems they reveal - are being left behind in processes of standardization in ES theory and practice. Cultural benefits challenge the emphasis on instrumental values common in the ES field. Further, in revealing the culturally contextual and situated character of all ES, cultural benefits challenge the universalizing and generalizing tendencies common in this field.More meaningful consideration of the cultural benefits of ES, as one strand of a larger movement toward value pluralism and knowledge pluralism, is a question of both equity and ecological outcomes. On-going conversations and critiques in the ES field around how to create space for multiple worldviews, including multiple human-nature relationships and well-beings, are critical to bringing environmental management into alignment with environmental justice, including distributional, procedural, and recognitional justice for current and future generations. In addition, ensuring a place for currently marginalized knowledge systems in ES theory and practice, including place-based and Indigenous ways of knowing, brings new solutions to the table and increases the adaptive capacity of managers and decision-makers at local and global scales as they face into growing global environmental challenges.To support movement toward knowledge pluralism in ES theory and practice, the three manuscripts presented in this dissertation offer: 1) a conceptual framework that reveals ES-knowledge as a system, seeking to support personal and collective reflexivity around the role of worldviews embedded in our institutions and the implications of this (Manuscript 1); 2) a theoretical model of learning opportunities for integration of a diverse forms of knowledge, and explores how some cultural-benefits-knowledge-forms are more likely to convey non-instrumental, relational value aspects or holistic value perspectives, and more likely to be effectively considered at particular stages of decision-making (Manuscript 2); and 3) an Opportunities Framework that can be used to systematically identify available forms of cultural-benefits-knowledge, and the opportunities that exist to integrate these knowledge forms in a particular decision context (Manuscript 3). This final manuscript both introduces the framework and illustrates its potential by applying it to a past decision process: Elwha River dam removal and restoration in Washington State, U.S.A. Next steps for research and application of a knowledge-pluralist ES approach are discussed in the dissertation's conclusion.

ISBN: 9798368427201Subjects--Topical Terms:

589570
Natural resource management.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Cultural benefits

Towards Value Pluralism, Knowledge Pluralism, and Recognitional Justice: Improving Integration of Cultural Benefits of Ecosystem Services in Environmental Decision-Making.
LDR:04478nmm a2200409 4500 001 2402367
005 20241028051814.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2022 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798368427201
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29993317
035 $a AAI29993317
035 $a 2402367
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Hoelting, Kristin R. $3 3772596
245 1 0 $a Towards Value Pluralism, Knowledge Pluralism, and Recognitional Justice: Improving Integration of Cultural Benefits of Ecosystem Services in Environmental Decision-Making.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2022
300 $a 347 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-07, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Gavin, Michael C.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Colorado State University, 2022.
520 $a This mainstreaming of the ecosystem services (ES) concept and approach is reflected in its adoption by governments and non-governmental organizations around the world, including in the United States: in 2015, a U.S. Federal Memorandum directed all Federal agencies to integrate ES information in their decision-making processes. In principle this momentum represents an opportunity for improved consideration of the cultural benefits of ES in decision-making, as part of the improved consideration of ES as a whole. However, there is concern that cultural benefits - and the plural values and multiple knowledge systems they reveal - are being left behind in processes of standardization in ES theory and practice. Cultural benefits challenge the emphasis on instrumental values common in the ES field. Further, in revealing the culturally contextual and situated character of all ES, cultural benefits challenge the universalizing and generalizing tendencies common in this field.More meaningful consideration of the cultural benefits of ES, as one strand of a larger movement toward value pluralism and knowledge pluralism, is a question of both equity and ecological outcomes. On-going conversations and critiques in the ES field around how to create space for multiple worldviews, including multiple human-nature relationships and well-beings, are critical to bringing environmental management into alignment with environmental justice, including distributional, procedural, and recognitional justice for current and future generations. In addition, ensuring a place for currently marginalized knowledge systems in ES theory and practice, including place-based and Indigenous ways of knowing, brings new solutions to the table and increases the adaptive capacity of managers and decision-makers at local and global scales as they face into growing global environmental challenges.To support movement toward knowledge pluralism in ES theory and practice, the three manuscripts presented in this dissertation offer: 1) a conceptual framework that reveals ES-knowledge as a system, seeking to support personal and collective reflexivity around the role of worldviews embedded in our institutions and the implications of this (Manuscript 1); 2) a theoretical model of learning opportunities for integration of a diverse forms of knowledge, and explores how some cultural-benefits-knowledge-forms are more likely to convey non-instrumental, relational value aspects or holistic value perspectives, and more likely to be effectively considered at particular stages of decision-making (Manuscript 2); and 3) an Opportunities Framework that can be used to systematically identify available forms of cultural-benefits-knowledge, and the opportunities that exist to integrate these knowledge forms in a particular decision context (Manuscript 3). This final manuscript both introduces the framework and illustrates its potential by applying it to a past decision process: Elwha River dam removal and restoration in Washington State, U.S.A. Next steps for research and application of a knowledge-pluralist ES approach are discussed in the dissertation's conclusion.
590 $a School code: 0053.
650 4 $a Natural resource management. $3 589570
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a Sociology. $3 516174
653 $a Cultural benefits
653 $a Ecosystem services
653 $a Knowledge pluralism
653 $a Recognition justice
653 $a Recognitional justice
653 $a Value pluralism
690 $a 0528
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0626
710 2 $a Colorado State University. $b Human Dimensions of Natural Resources. $3 1675821
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-07B.
790 $a 0053
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2022
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29993317