東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Effects of Neuromuscular Electri...

Jeon, Sunggun.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Effects of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on the Contralateral Repeated Bout Effect of the Elbow Flexor Muscles.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Effects of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on the Contralateral Repeated Bout Effect of the Elbow Flexor Muscles./
作者:	Jeon, Sunggun.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2023,
面頁冊數:	87 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-02, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-02A.
標題:	Kinesiology. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30427045
ISBN:	9798380079228

The Effects of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on the Contralateral Repeated Bout Effect of the Elbow Flexor Muscles.
Jeon, Sunggun.

The Effects of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on the Contralateral Repeated Bout Effect of the Elbow Flexor Muscles. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2023 - 87 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-02, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Oklahoma State University, 2023.

PURPOSE: To examine the effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on the contralateral repeated bout effect (CL-RBE) of the biceps brachii (BB). METHODS: Twenty untrained adults were randomly assigned into an ipsilateral (IL) or CL group, and completed 7 visits. Following a familiarization (visit 1), participants completed 3 maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVICs) and submaximal trapezoidal contractions at 40% and 70% MVIC before and after 45 NMES to the BB muscle (1st bout) at pre (visit 2), post (visit 2), 1 day post (24post [visit 3]), and 2 days post (48post [visit 4]). The same procedures were performed for visits 5 (2nd bout), 6 (24post), and 7 (48post) on the same arm for IL or the contralateral arm for CL. Muscle damage markers (MVIC, elbow range of motion [ROM], visual analog scale [VAS] and pressure pain threshold [PPT] for muscle soreness and pain, and muscle thickness via ultrasonography were measured. Surface electromyography (EMG) and mechanomyography (MMG) were recorded from the BB. The EMG signals were decomposed to calculate y-intercepts and slopes for the motor unit (MU) mean firing rate (MFR) and MU action potential amplitude (MUAPAMP) vs. recruitment threshold (RT) relationships. The MMG amplitude (MMGRMS)-force relationships were log-transformed to calculate a and{A0}b terms for the linearly varying segments of the trapezoid. EMG amplitude (EMGRMS) and MMGRMS during steady force were normalized (N-EMGRMS, N-MMGRMS) to MVIC. Separate mixed factorial analysis of variance (ANOVAs) were performed. RESULTS: MVIC and ROM at post were less than pre, 24post, and 48post (p<0.05). Muscle thickness at pre was less than post (p<0.001) and 24post (p=0.019). PPT and the{A0}b terms at pre were greater (p<0.05) than post, 24post, and 48post. Y-intercepts for the MFR vs. RT relationships during the 70% MVIC were lower at post than pre (p=0.015), 24post (p=0.050), and 48post (p=0.016). VAS were lower (p=0.003) during the second bout (0.21{phono}{lstrok}0.27cm) than the first bout (1.06{phono}{lstrok}0.70cm) for the IL group. There were no significant differences between bouts for other dependent variables. CONCLUSION: Although there was an IL-RBE for VAS, the other variables did not support the existence of IL- or CL-RBE with NMES.

ISBN: 9798380079228Subjects--Topical Terms:

517627
Kinesiology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Cross education

The Effects of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on the Contralateral Repeated Bout Effect of the Elbow Flexor Muscles.
LDR:03630nmm a2200433 4500 001 2401356
005 20241022112556.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2023 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798380079228
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30427045
035 $a AAI30427045
035 $a 2401356
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Jeon, Sunggun. $3 3771448
245 1 0 $a The Effects of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on the Contralateral Repeated Bout Effect of the Elbow Flexor Muscles.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2023
300 $a 87 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-02, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Trevino, Michael.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Oklahoma State University, 2023.
520 $a PURPOSE: To examine the effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on the contralateral repeated bout effect (CL-RBE) of the biceps brachii (BB). METHODS: Twenty untrained adults were randomly assigned into an ipsilateral (IL) or CL group, and completed 7 visits. Following a familiarization (visit 1), participants completed 3 maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVICs) and submaximal trapezoidal contractions at 40% and 70% MVIC before and after 45 NMES to the BB muscle (1st bout) at pre (visit 2), post (visit 2), 1 day post (24post [visit 3]), and 2 days post (48post [visit 4]). The same procedures were performed for visits 5 (2nd bout), 6 (24post), and 7 (48post) on the same arm for IL or the contralateral arm for CL. Muscle damage markers (MVIC, elbow range of motion [ROM], visual analog scale [VAS] and pressure pain threshold [PPT] for muscle soreness and pain, and muscle thickness via ultrasonography were measured. Surface electromyography (EMG) and mechanomyography (MMG) were recorded from the BB. The EMG signals were decomposed to calculate y-intercepts and slopes for the motor unit (MU) mean firing rate (MFR) and MU action potential amplitude (MUAPAMP) vs. recruitment threshold (RT) relationships. The MMG amplitude (MMGRMS)-force relationships were log-transformed to calculate a and{A0}b terms for the linearly varying segments of the trapezoid. EMG amplitude (EMGRMS) and MMGRMS during steady force were normalized (N-EMGRMS, N-MMGRMS) to MVIC. Separate mixed factorial analysis of variance (ANOVAs) were performed. RESULTS: MVIC and ROM at post were less than pre, 24post, and 48post (p<0.05). Muscle thickness at pre was less than post (p<0.001) and 24post (p=0.019). PPT and the{A0}b terms at pre were greater (p<0.05) than post, 24post, and 48post. Y-intercepts for the MFR vs. RT relationships during the 70% MVIC were lower at post than pre (p=0.015), 24post (p=0.050), and 48post (p=0.016). VAS were lower (p=0.003) during the second bout (0.21{phono}{lstrok}0.27cm) than the first bout (1.06{phono}{lstrok}0.70cm) for the IL group. There were no significant differences between bouts for other dependent variables. CONCLUSION: Although there was an IL-RBE for VAS, the other variables did not support the existence of IL- or CL-RBE with NMES.
590 $a School code: 0664.
650 4 $a Kinesiology. $3 517627
650 4 $a Biophysics. $3 518360
650 4 $a Physical education. $3 635343
653 $a Cross education
653 $a Electromyography
653 $a Motor unit
653 $a Muscle damage
653 $a Muscle stimulation
653 $a Protective effect
653 $a Neuromuscular electrical stimulation
653 $a Biceps brachii
690 $a 0575
690 $a 0786
690 $a 0523
710 2 $a Oklahoma State University. $b Health, Leisure & Human Performance (PhD). $3 3348845
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-02A.
790 $a 0664
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2023
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30427045