東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

An Assessment of the Potential for L...

Menshawy, A El.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

An Assessment of the Potential for Legal Redress for Systematic Errors in Unpermissioned Blockchain Technology Under English Law.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	An Assessment of the Potential for Legal Redress for Systematic Errors in Unpermissioned Blockchain Technology Under English Law./
Author:	Menshawy, A El.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2023,
Description:	249 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-08, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-08B.
Subject:	Criminal statistics. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30791409
ISBN:	9798381459784

An Assessment of the Potential for Legal Redress for Systematic Errors in Unpermissioned Blockchain Technology Under English Law.
Menshawy, A El.

An Assessment of the Potential for Legal Redress for Systematic Errors in Unpermissioned Blockchain Technology Under English Law. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2023 - 249 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-08, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Nottingham Trent University (United Kingdom), 2023.

This thesis focuses on the potential for legal redress to be afforded to users who suffer loss resulting from transactions impacted by systematic errors in unpermissioned blockchains. Blockchain technology, which enables a cryptographically secure form of record keeping, is an emerging topic that has the potential to be adopted in many contexts, notably in cryptocurrencies. Unpermissioned blockchain technology provides a unique and decentralised technology in which anyone can participate or alter, and it gives rise to questions as to its compatibility with traditional legal frameworks. The regulatory landscape concerning unpermissioned blockchain technology has hitherto largely focused on the issue of money laundering via cryptocurrencies. However, this has resulted in limited legal protection for users in respect of liability for systematic errors. This thesis will explore the potential for development of the current English legal framework to enable protection to users who suffer loss attributable to systematic errors. Further to this, there shall be the exploration of creative legal solutions for regulating unpermissioned blockchain with the aim of enhanced clarity and legal protection for users in three different contexts: peer to peer, cryptocurrency exchange and DeFi exchange transactions. The public are most likely to encounter unpermissioned blockchain technology in these contexts, through cryptocurrency trading, and therefore risks in each instance may present the most likely case for regulation. Employing a decentred view of regulation, Ostrom's self-management principles are drawn upon as one potential model of self-regulation that might be adapted for unpermissioned blockchain technology.

ISBN: 9798381459784Subjects--Topical Terms:

847093
Criminal statistics.

An Assessment of the Potential for Legal Redress for Systematic Errors in Unpermissioned Blockchain Technology Under English Law.
LDR:02999nmm a2200445 4500 001 2399441
005 20240916065442.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2023 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798381459784
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30791409
035 $a (MiAaPQ)Nottingham_49822
035 $a AAI30791409
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Menshawy, A El. $3 3769409
245 1 3 $a An Assessment of the Potential for Legal Redress for Systematic Errors in Unpermissioned Blockchain Technology Under English Law.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2023
300 $a 249 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-08, Section: B.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Nottingham Trent University (United Kingdom), 2023.
520 $a This thesis focuses on the potential for legal redress to be afforded to users who suffer loss resulting from transactions impacted by systematic errors in unpermissioned blockchains. Blockchain technology, which enables a cryptographically secure form of record keeping, is an emerging topic that has the potential to be adopted in many contexts, notably in cryptocurrencies. Unpermissioned blockchain technology provides a unique and decentralised technology in which anyone can participate or alter, and it gives rise to questions as to its compatibility with traditional legal frameworks. The regulatory landscape concerning unpermissioned blockchain technology has hitherto largely focused on the issue of money laundering via cryptocurrencies. However, this has resulted in limited legal protection for users in respect of liability for systematic errors. This thesis will explore the potential for development of the current English legal framework to enable protection to users who suffer loss attributable to systematic errors. Further to this, there shall be the exploration of creative legal solutions for regulating unpermissioned blockchain with the aim of enhanced clarity and legal protection for users in three different contexts: peer to peer, cryptocurrency exchange and DeFi exchange transactions. The public are most likely to encounter unpermissioned blockchain technology in these contexts, through cryptocurrency trading, and therefore risks in each instance may present the most likely case for regulation. Employing a decentred view of regulation, Ostrom's self-management principles are drawn upon as one potential model of self-regulation that might be adapted for unpermissioned blockchain technology.
590 $a School code: 8745.
650 4 $a Criminal statistics. $3 847093
650 4 $a Politics. $3 685427
650 4 $a Liability. $3 3562832
650 4 $a Environmental impact. $3 3564810
650 4 $a Energy consumption. $3 631630
650 4 $a End users. $3 3680535
650 4 $a Licenses. $3 755699
650 4 $a Trust. $3 536251
650 4 $a Bills of lading. $3 3252121
650 4 $a Information technology. $3 532993
650 4 $a Criminology. $3 533274
650 4 $a Finance. $3 542899
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a Statistics. $3 517247
690 $a 0770
690 $a 0489
690 $a 0543
690 $a 0627
690 $a 0501
690 $a 0474
690 $a 0508
690 $a 0601
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0338
690 $a 0796
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0463
710 2 $a Nottingham Trent University (United Kingdom). $3 3545894
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-08B.
790 $a 8745
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2023
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30791409