Language:
English
繁體中文
Help
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
Login
Back
Switch To:
Labeled
|
MARC Mode
|
ISBD
Knowledge Authoring With Factual Eng...
~
Wang, Yuheng.
Linked to FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Knowledge Authoring With Factual English, Rules, and Actions.
Record Type:
Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:
Knowledge Authoring With Factual English, Rules, and Actions./
Author:
Wang, Yuheng.
Published:
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2023,
Description:
99 p.
Notes:
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-07, Section: A.
Contained By:
Dissertations Abstracts International85-07A.
Subject:
Computer science. -
Online resource:
https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30695759
ISBN:
9798381400052
Knowledge Authoring With Factual English, Rules, and Actions.
Wang, Yuheng.
Knowledge Authoring With Factual English, Rules, and Actions.
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2023 - 99 p.
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-07, Section: A.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--State University of New York at Stony Brook, 2023.
Knowledge representation and reasoning (KRR) systems represent knowledge as collections of facts and rules. Like databases, KRR systems contain information about domains of human activities like industrial enterprises, science, and business. KRRs can represent complex concepts and relations, and they can query and manipulate information in sophisticated ways. Unfortunately, the KRR technology has been hindered by the fact that specifying the requisite knowledge requires skills that most domain experts do not have, and professional knowledge engineers are hard to find. One solution could be to extract knowledge from English text, and a number of works have attempted to do so (OpenSesame, Google's Sling, etc.). Unfortunately, at present, extraction of logical facts from unrestricted natural language is still too inaccurate to be used for reasoning, while restricted grammars of the language (so-called controlled natural languages, or CNL) are hard for the users to learn and use. Nevertheless, some recent CNL-based approaches, such as the Knowledge Authoring Logic Machine (KALM), have shown to have very high accuracy compared to others, and a natural question is to what extent the CNL restrictions can be lifted. Besides the CNL restrictions, KALM has limitations in terms of the types of knowledge it can represent. For example, KALM users cannot author rules to support multi-step reasoning, nor can they author actions associated with occurrences of events, which hinders its ability to do time-related reasoning. Apart from the aforementioned shortcomings, the system's speed was insufficient to adequately support the overall knowledge authoring process.To address these issues, we propose an extension of KALM called KALM for Factual Language (KALMFL). KALMFL uses a neural parser for natural language, mStanza, to parse what we call factual English sentences, which require little grammar training to use. Building upon KALMFL, we propose KALM for Rules and Actions (KALMRA), to represent and reason with rules and actions. Furthermore, we identify the reasons behind the slow speed of KALM and make optimizations to address this issue. Our evaluation using multiple benchmarks shows that our approaches achieve a high level of correctness on fact and query authoring (95%) and on rule authoring (100%). When used for authoring and reasoning with actions, our approach achieves more than 99.3% correctness, demonstrating its effectiveness in enabling more sophisticated knowledge representation and reasoning. We also illustrate the logical reasoning capabilities of our approach by drawing attention to the problems faced by the famous AI, ChatGPT. Finally, the evaluation of the newly proposed speed optimization points not only to a 68% runtime improvement but also yields better accuracy of the overall system.
ISBN: 9798381400052Subjects--Topical Terms:
523869
Computer science.
Subjects--Index Terms:
Logic programming
Knowledge Authoring With Factual English, Rules, and Actions.
LDR
:04079nmm a2200409 4500
001
2399215
005
20240909100753.5
006
m o d
007
cr#unu||||||||
008
251215s2023 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9798381400052
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI30695759
035
$a
AAI30695759
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Wang, Yuheng.
$3
3769188
245
1 0
$a
Knowledge Authoring With Factual English, Rules, and Actions.
260
1
$a
Ann Arbor :
$b
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
$c
2023
300
$a
99 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-07, Section: A.
500
$a
Advisor: Kifer, Michael;Fodor, Pual.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--State University of New York at Stony Brook, 2023.
520
$a
Knowledge representation and reasoning (KRR) systems represent knowledge as collections of facts and rules. Like databases, KRR systems contain information about domains of human activities like industrial enterprises, science, and business. KRRs can represent complex concepts and relations, and they can query and manipulate information in sophisticated ways. Unfortunately, the KRR technology has been hindered by the fact that specifying the requisite knowledge requires skills that most domain experts do not have, and professional knowledge engineers are hard to find. One solution could be to extract knowledge from English text, and a number of works have attempted to do so (OpenSesame, Google's Sling, etc.). Unfortunately, at present, extraction of logical facts from unrestricted natural language is still too inaccurate to be used for reasoning, while restricted grammars of the language (so-called controlled natural languages, or CNL) are hard for the users to learn and use. Nevertheless, some recent CNL-based approaches, such as the Knowledge Authoring Logic Machine (KALM), have shown to have very high accuracy compared to others, and a natural question is to what extent the CNL restrictions can be lifted. Besides the CNL restrictions, KALM has limitations in terms of the types of knowledge it can represent. For example, KALM users cannot author rules to support multi-step reasoning, nor can they author actions associated with occurrences of events, which hinders its ability to do time-related reasoning. Apart from the aforementioned shortcomings, the system's speed was insufficient to adequately support the overall knowledge authoring process.To address these issues, we propose an extension of KALM called KALM for Factual Language (KALMFL). KALMFL uses a neural parser for natural language, mStanza, to parse what we call factual English sentences, which require little grammar training to use. Building upon KALMFL, we propose KALM for Rules and Actions (KALMRA), to represent and reason with rules and actions. Furthermore, we identify the reasons behind the slow speed of KALM and make optimizations to address this issue. Our evaluation using multiple benchmarks shows that our approaches achieve a high level of correctness on fact and query authoring (95%) and on rule authoring (100%). When used for authoring and reasoning with actions, our approach achieves more than 99.3% correctness, demonstrating its effectiveness in enabling more sophisticated knowledge representation and reasoning. We also illustrate the logical reasoning capabilities of our approach by drawing attention to the problems faced by the famous AI, ChatGPT. Finally, the evaluation of the newly proposed speed optimization points not only to a 68% runtime improvement but also yields better accuracy of the overall system.
590
$a
School code: 0771.
650
4
$a
Computer science.
$3
523869
650
4
$a
Computer engineering.
$3
621879
650
4
$a
Information technology.
$3
532993
650
4
$a
Logic.
$3
529544
650
4
$a
Information science.
$3
554358
653
$a
Logic programming
653
$a
Natural language processing
653
$a
Natural language understanding
653
$a
Question answering
653
$a
Industrial enterprises
690
$a
0984
690
$a
0489
690
$a
0464
690
$a
0723
690
$a
0395
710
2
$a
State University of New York at Stony Brook.
$b
Computer Science.
$3
1674709
773
0
$t
Dissertations Abstracts International
$g
85-07A.
790
$a
0771
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2023
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30695759
based on 0 review(s)
Location:
ALL
電子資源
Year:
Volume Number:
Items
1 records • Pages 1 •
1
Inventory Number
Location Name
Item Class
Material type
Call number
Usage Class
Loan Status
No. of reservations
Opac note
Attachments
W9507535
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
On shelf
0
1 records • Pages 1 •
1
Multimedia
Reviews
Add a review
and share your thoughts with other readers
Export
pickup library
Processing
...
Change password
Login