東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Conceptual and Discursive Reality of...

Lee, SuHak.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Conceptual and Discursive Reality of Medication Accumulation at Home.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Conceptual and Discursive Reality of Medication Accumulation at Home./
作者:	Lee, SuHak.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2024,
面頁冊數:	276 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-08, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-08B.
標題:	Health sciences. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30989715
ISBN:	9798381723205

Conceptual and Discursive Reality of Medication Accumulation at Home.
Lee, SuHak.

Conceptual and Discursive Reality of Medication Accumulation at Home. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024 - 276 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-08, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Minnesota, 2024.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Background: Medication hoarding is associated with unintended consequences on healthcare costs, patient safety, the environment, and quality of care. To prevent medication hoarding and its negative consequences, the reasons for the behavior must be understood. However, research regarding medication hoarding is scant and ambiguous. Medication hoarding appeared in the context of medication stockpiling and the retention of unused, unwanted, expired, or leftover (UUEL) medications. A full grasp of the relationships among these seemingly competing concepts would provide insight into the cause of the conceptual confusion.Objectives: This study aims to 1) conceptually analyze the hoarding of prescription and over-the-counter medications by individuals at home and its competing concepts, such as medication stockpiling and the retention of UUEL medications in the scientific literature, 2) establish a theoretical definition of medication accumulation based on the three competing concepts of interest, 3) analyze the discourses around medication hoarding and stockpiling in the scientific literature that utilized the two terms interchangeably, and 4) determine the congruence between the results of the principled-based concept analysis and discursive psychology.Methods: The search terms were selected based on the three related concepts: medication hoarding, medication stockpiling, and UUEL medications identified in the literature review. For the principle-based concept analysis, 107 scientific articles were reviewed. The relevant information for each concept was coded based on the seven conceptual components, and their conceptual maturity was evaluated. The three concepts were then perceived as medication accumulation and analyzed to construct a theoretical definition. Discursive psychology was conducted with six articles that used the two terms interchangeably, and the interpretative repertories around medication hoarding and stockpiling were examined. The results were compared for congruence. Results: The principle-based concept analysis revealed that the three concepts were immature. Based on the consumption activities and types of medications encompassed by each concept, the retention of UUEL medications was deemed subordinate to medication hoarding and different from medication stockpiling. Perceiving the concepts as medication accumulation revealed four causes of negative consequences. The discursive psychology found four interpretative repertories: "medication hoarding and stockpiling as a negative behavior," medication stockpiling as a consumer behavior," "empiricist repertories," and "conjectural repertories."Discussion/Conclusion: The inconsistent definitions of the concepts mainly caused their conceptual immaturity. The same type of confusion was also noted in the discursive psychology. With the confusion around the meaning of each behavior, the presumptive use of the terms worsened the obscurity. Despite the ambiguous boundaries, perceiving the three concepts as medication accumulation led to more practical implications. The causes of the negative consequences can be minimized by promoting medication take-back and reuse programs and at-home disposal kits. Consolidating the concepts will also unify any future research effort and prevent stigma around a particular behavior.

ISBN: 9798381723205Subjects--Topical Terms:

3168359
Health sciences.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Medication accumulation

Conceptual and Discursive Reality of Medication Accumulation at Home.
LDR:04603nmm a2200421 4500 001 2396960
005 20240618081829.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2024 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798381723205
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30989715
035 $a AAI30989715
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Lee, SuHak. $3 3766724
245 1 0 $a Conceptual and Discursive Reality of Medication Accumulation at Home.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 276 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-08, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Schommer, Jon C.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Minnesota, 2024.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Background: Medication hoarding is associated with unintended consequences on healthcare costs, patient safety, the environment, and quality of care. To prevent medication hoarding and its negative consequences, the reasons for the behavior must be understood. However, research regarding medication hoarding is scant and ambiguous. Medication hoarding appeared in the context of medication stockpiling and the retention of unused, unwanted, expired, or leftover (UUEL) medications. A full grasp of the relationships among these seemingly competing concepts would provide insight into the cause of the conceptual confusion.Objectives: This study aims to 1) conceptually analyze the hoarding of prescription and over-the-counter medications by individuals at home and its competing concepts, such as medication stockpiling and the retention of UUEL medications in the scientific literature, 2) establish a theoretical definition of medication accumulation based on the three competing concepts of interest, 3) analyze the discourses around medication hoarding and stockpiling in the scientific literature that utilized the two terms interchangeably, and 4) determine the congruence between the results of the principled-based concept analysis and discursive psychology.Methods: The search terms were selected based on the three related concepts: medication hoarding, medication stockpiling, and UUEL medications identified in the literature review. For the principle-based concept analysis, 107 scientific articles were reviewed. The relevant information for each concept was coded based on the seven conceptual components, and their conceptual maturity was evaluated. The three concepts were then perceived as medication accumulation and analyzed to construct a theoretical definition. Discursive psychology was conducted with six articles that used the two terms interchangeably, and the interpretative repertories around medication hoarding and stockpiling were examined. The results were compared for congruence. Results: The principle-based concept analysis revealed that the three concepts were immature. Based on the consumption activities and types of medications encompassed by each concept, the retention of UUEL medications was deemed subordinate to medication hoarding and different from medication stockpiling. Perceiving the concepts as medication accumulation revealed four causes of negative consequences. The discursive psychology found four interpretative repertories: "medication hoarding and stockpiling as a negative behavior," medication stockpiling as a consumer behavior," "empiricist repertories," and "conjectural repertories."Discussion/Conclusion: The inconsistent definitions of the concepts mainly caused their conceptual immaturity. The same type of confusion was also noted in the discursive psychology. With the confusion around the meaning of each behavior, the presumptive use of the terms worsened the obscurity. Despite the ambiguous boundaries, perceiving the three concepts as medication accumulation led to more practical implications. The causes of the negative consequences can be minimized by promoting medication take-back and reuse programs and at-home disposal kits. Consolidating the concepts will also unify any future research effort and prevent stigma around a particular behavior.
590 $a School code: 0130.
650 4 $a Health sciences. $3 3168359
650 4 $a Pharmaceutical sciences. $3 3173021
650 4 $a Home economics. $3 551902
650 4 $a Behavioral psychology. $3 2122788
653 $a Medication accumulation
653 $a Medication hoarding
653 $a Medication stockpiling
653 $a Discursive psychology
653 $a Congruence
690 $a 0566
690 $a 0572
690 $a 0338
690 $a 0386
690 $a 0384
710 2 $a University of Minnesota. $b Social and Administrative Pharmacy. $3 2096603
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-08B.
790 $a 0130
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2024
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30989715