東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

What Do You Notice? What Do You Wond...

Herrick, Imogen Rose Neilson.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

What Do You Notice? What Do You Wonder? A Mixed-Methods Investigation Into Community Science Data Talks.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	What Do You Notice? What Do You Wonder? A Mixed-Methods Investigation Into Community Science Data Talks./
Author:	Herrick, Imogen Rose Neilson.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2023,
Description:	237 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-06, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-06B.
Subject:	Science education. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30816396
ISBN:	9798381168402

What Do You Notice? What Do You Wonder? A Mixed-Methods Investigation Into Community Science Data Talks.
Herrick, Imogen Rose Neilson.

What Do You Notice? What Do You Wonder? A Mixed-Methods Investigation Into Community Science Data Talks. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2023 - 237 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-06, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Southern California, 2023.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

As social, racial, and environmental justice topics dominate national conversations, STEM teachers must provide learning opportunities that support students to make sense of these problems and co-construct hope for their futures (Calabrese-Barton et al., 2020; Ojala, 2012). Thinking about how teachers can begin to transform their classrooms into places where discussions about inequity, power, environmental justice, and STEM are commonplace, requires the design of innovative opportunities for youth to engage critically with STEM content and acquire skills to transform their current realities and hoped-for future (e.g., Calabrese Barton et al., 2020; Ladson-Billings, 1995; Morales-Doyle, 2017; Rubel, 2017). This dissertation is framed around a potential innovative STEM classroom discourse routine, Community Science Data Talks (CSDTs). The purpose of this study was to examine the potential of CDSTs as a tool for teachers and students to co-construct the learning environment to discuss and learn about local environmental justice issues. The main objective of this study was to investigate if CSDTs could over time stretch teachers' visions of classroom learning and expand students' experiences with local science.This design-based convergent parallel mixed methods case study compares two classrooms in different contexts (i.e., privileged and underserved) to understand what is possible when teachers and students engage in CSDTs. The findings indicate that students across contexts became more proficient in STEM disciplinary practices, had a transformative experiences (e.g., Pugh, 2011), and constructed hope for their futures (e.g., Ojala, 2012). Students constructed hope through different pathways depending on their context. Additionally, the small-scale practice of CSDTs supported teachers in both contexts to experience moments of bearing witness that stretched their pedagogical visions in justice-oriented ways (Hansen, 2017). Overall, these findings indicate that CSDTs are a small-scale justice-centered STEM routine that can provide access for teachers and students to begin working in more transformative ways together (Calabrese Barton et al., 2020; Morales-Doyle, 2017).

ISBN: 9798381168402Subjects--Topical Terms:

521340
Science education.
Subjects--Index Terms:

STEM teachers

What Do You Notice? What Do You Wonder? A Mixed-Methods Investigation Into Community Science Data Talks.
LDR:03517nmm a2200421 4500 001 2396567
005 20240611104332.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2023 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798381168402
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30816396
035 $a AAI30816396
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Herrick, Imogen Rose Neilson. $3 3766263
245 1 0 $a What Do You Notice? What Do You Wonder? A Mixed-Methods Investigation Into Community Science Data Talks.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2023
300 $a 237 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-06, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Sinatra, Gale.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Southern California, 2023.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a As social, racial, and environmental justice topics dominate national conversations, STEM teachers must provide learning opportunities that support students to make sense of these problems and co-construct hope for their futures (Calabrese-Barton et al., 2020; Ojala, 2012). Thinking about how teachers can begin to transform their classrooms into places where discussions about inequity, power, environmental justice, and STEM are commonplace, requires the design of innovative opportunities for youth to engage critically with STEM content and acquire skills to transform their current realities and hoped-for future (e.g., Calabrese Barton et al., 2020; Ladson-Billings, 1995; Morales-Doyle, 2017; Rubel, 2017). This dissertation is framed around a potential innovative STEM classroom discourse routine, Community Science Data Talks (CSDTs). The purpose of this study was to examine the potential of CDSTs as a tool for teachers and students to co-construct the learning environment to discuss and learn about local environmental justice issues. The main objective of this study was to investigate if CSDTs could over time stretch teachers' visions of classroom learning and expand students' experiences with local science.This design-based convergent parallel mixed methods case study compares two classrooms in different contexts (i.e., privileged and underserved) to understand what is possible when teachers and students engage in CSDTs. The findings indicate that students across contexts became more proficient in STEM disciplinary practices, had a transformative experiences (e.g., Pugh, 2011), and constructed hope for their futures (e.g., Ojala, 2012). Students constructed hope through different pathways depending on their context. Additionally, the small-scale practice of CSDTs supported teachers in both contexts to experience moments of bearing witness that stretched their pedagogical visions in justice-oriented ways (Hansen, 2017). Overall, these findings indicate that CSDTs are a small-scale justice-centered STEM routine that can provide access for teachers and students to begin working in more transformative ways together (Calabrese Barton et al., 2020; Morales-Doyle, 2017).
590 $a School code: 0208.
650 4 $a Science education. $3 521340
650 4 $a Environmental education. $3 528212
650 4 $a Environmental justice. $3 528369
650 4 $a Pedagogy. $3 2122828
650 4 $a Climate change. $2 bicssc $3 2079509
653 $a STEM teachers
653 $a Community Science Data Talks
653 $a Transformative experiences
653 $a Local science
653 $a Students
690 $a 0714
690 $a 0442
690 $a 0456
690 $a 0404
690 $a 0619
710 2 $a University of Southern California. $b Education. $3 1024119
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-06B.
790 $a 0208
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2023
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30816396