東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Human Right to Development: Hist...

Kimber, Norman R.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Human Right to Development: Historical and Contemporary Linkages to Colonialism.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Human Right to Development: Historical and Contemporary Linkages to Colonialism./
作者:	Kimber, Norman R.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2023,
面頁冊數:	178 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-04.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International85-04.
標題:	Freedoms. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30625176
ISBN:	9798380485470

The Human Right to Development: Historical and Contemporary Linkages to Colonialism.
Kimber, Norman R.

The Human Right to Development: Historical and Contemporary Linkages to Colonialism. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2023 - 178 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-04.

Thesis (LL.M.)--The University of Western Ontario (Canada), 2023.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

This thesis concerns the Right to Development (the R2D), which was declared an inalienable human right by the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) in the nonbinding Declaration on the Right to Development (the DR2D) in 1986. It asserts that the R2D was not declared in a realizable manner, explaining the causes of identified doctrinal shortcomings. It explores the emergence of the R2D within the confluence of two post1945 movements, being decolonization and the international human rights project, asserting that these movements were closely intertwined and substantively influenced by jurists from the Global South. The thesis then examines the political evolution of the R2D within the UNGA, asserting that shortcomings of the DR2D were the result of politicization and resistance to the acceptance of accountability with respect to R2D realization by powerful states, led by the USA. It argues that the R2D ought to be framed as a central component of the binding Right to Self Determination (the R2SD), such that the R2D ought to be interpreted as a binding right to the process of self-determined development. This assertion is illustrated through examination of R2D (non)realization and R2SD (non)observance in the occupied Palestinian Territories, a situation of settler colonization characterized by economic de-development, and deprivations with respect to 'development as freedom', a lens suggested by the work Amartya Sen.

ISBN: 9798380485470Subjects--Topical Terms:

3764752
Freedoms.

The Human Right to Development: Historical and Contemporary Linkages to Colonialism.
LDR:02668nmm a2200421 4500 001 2395250
005 20240517100410.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2023 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798380485470
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30625176
035 $a (MiAaPQ)oaiirlibuwocaetd12087
035 $a AAI30625176
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Kimber, Norman R. $3 3764751
245 1 0 $a The Human Right to Development: Historical and Contemporary Linkages to Colonialism.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2023
300 $a 178 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-04.
500 $a Advisor: Lynk, Michael.
502 $a Thesis (LL.M.)--The University of Western Ontario (Canada), 2023.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a This thesis concerns the Right to Development (the R2D), which was declared an inalienable human right by the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) in the nonbinding Declaration on the Right to Development (the DR2D) in 1986. It asserts that the R2D was not declared in a realizable manner, explaining the causes of identified doctrinal shortcomings. It explores the emergence of the R2D within the confluence of two post1945 movements, being decolonization and the international human rights project, asserting that these movements were closely intertwined and substantively influenced by jurists from the Global South. The thesis then examines the political evolution of the R2D within the UNGA, asserting that shortcomings of the DR2D were the result of politicization and resistance to the acceptance of accountability with respect to R2D realization by powerful states, led by the USA. It argues that the R2D ought to be framed as a central component of the binding Right to Self Determination (the R2SD), such that the R2D ought to be interpreted as a binding right to the process of self-determined development. This assertion is illustrated through examination of R2D (non)realization and R2SD (non)observance in the occupied Palestinian Territories, a situation of settler colonization characterized by economic de-development, and deprivations with respect to 'development as freedom', a lens suggested by the work Amartya Sen.
590 $a School code: 0784.
650 4 $a Freedoms. $3 3764752
650 4 $a Violations. $3 3558956
650 4 $a Ideology. $3 521772
650 4 $a Racial discrimination. $3 3682108
650 4 $a Humanitarianism. $3 1093738
650 4 $a International law. $3 560784
650 4 $a Apartheid. $2 fast $3 2076210
650 4 $a Colonialism. $3 919746
650 4 $a Covenants. $3 3560945
650 4 $a Racism. $3 519298
650 4 $a Decolonization. $3 535984
650 4 $a Sovereignty. $3 571951
650 4 $a Human rights. $3 527798
650 4 $a Equal rights. $3 3680448
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a Social psychology. $3 520219
690 $a 0729
690 $a 0616
690 $a 0501
690 $a 0629
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0451
690 $a 0354
710 2 $a The University of Western Ontario (Canada). $3 1017622
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 85-04.
790 $a 0784
791 $a LL.M.
792 $a 2023
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30625176