東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Supernatural Law? A Refutation of Th...

Dellinger, Jackson.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Supernatural Law? A Refutation of Three Recent Natural-Law Arguments Against Catholic Integralism.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Supernatural Law? A Refutation of Three Recent Natural-Law Arguments Against Catholic Integralism./
作者:	Dellinger, Jackson.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2023,
面頁冊數:	37 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International85-01.
標題:	Philosophy. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30488868
ISBN:	9798379851088

Supernatural Law? A Refutation of Three Recent Natural-Law Arguments Against Catholic Integralism.
Dellinger, Jackson.

Supernatural Law? A Refutation of Three Recent Natural-Law Arguments Against Catholic Integralism. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2023 - 37 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01.

Thesis (M.A.)--The University of Mississippi, 2023.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

In the United States, there is a longstanding debate over the proper relationship between religious and civil institutions, or "church and state." One radical voice in the debate is that of Catholic integralism, a school within Catholic social teaching which argues that Catholic governments should submit to the religious authority of the Church, and that Catholics should aspire towards a Catholic society with this relationship between Church and State for all nations. Recently, interlocutors have attempted to show that integralism is inconsistent with a core element of the Catholic teaching to which they appeal-that is, natural law. In this paper, I respond to three such arguments.The first argues that integralists violate natural laws pertaining to individual justice through a consequentialist political philosophy. I argue that integralists do no such thing. Rather, they recognize limits on state policing of individuals, even in pursuit of the common good. The second argues that integralism, negating all constitutional limits, constitutes a form of totalitarianism. I argue that it does not. Rather, integralists may support a variety of constitutional schemes within reason and that integralism is built on a specific constitutional limitation, the distinction between the Church and the State powers. The third argues that integralism (in both "thick" and "thin" varieties) treats religious groups unfairly. I argue that thin integralism does not. Rather, thin integralists treat religious groups according to their baptismal status, an element of Catholic teaching.I conclude the paper by acknowledging the connection between integralism and Catholic teaching and the difficulty in upholding Catholicism while making quick work of integralism.

ISBN: 9798379851088Subjects--Topical Terms:

516511
Philosophy.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Catholic

Supernatural Law? A Refutation of Three Recent Natural-Law Arguments Against Catholic Integralism.
LDR:02994nmm a2200409 4500 001 2393033
005 20231130111621.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2023 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798379851088
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30488868
035 $a AAI30488868
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Dellinger, Jackson. $3 3762474
245 1 0 $a Supernatural Law? A Refutation of Three Recent Natural-Law Arguments Against Catholic Integralism.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2023
300 $a 37 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01.
500 $a Advisor: Skultety, Steven.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--The University of Mississippi, 2023.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a In the United States, there is a longstanding debate over the proper relationship between religious and civil institutions, or "church and state." One radical voice in the debate is that of Catholic integralism, a school within Catholic social teaching which argues that Catholic governments should submit to the religious authority of the Church, and that Catholics should aspire towards a Catholic society with this relationship between Church and State for all nations. Recently, interlocutors have attempted to show that integralism is inconsistent with a core element of the Catholic teaching to which they appeal-that is, natural law. In this paper, I respond to three such arguments.The first argues that integralists violate natural laws pertaining to individual justice through a consequentialist political philosophy. I argue that integralists do no such thing. Rather, they recognize limits on state policing of individuals, even in pursuit of the common good. The second argues that integralism, negating all constitutional limits, constitutes a form of totalitarianism. I argue that it does not. Rather, integralists may support a variety of constitutional schemes within reason and that integralism is built on a specific constitutional limitation, the distinction between the Church and the State powers. The third argues that integralism (in both "thick" and "thin" varieties) treats religious groups unfairly. I argue that thin integralism does not. Rather, thin integralists treat religious groups according to their baptismal status, an element of Catholic teaching.I conclude the paper by acknowledging the connection between integralism and Catholic teaching and the difficulty in upholding Catholicism while making quick work of integralism.
590 $a School code: 0131.
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Philosophy of religion. $2 bicssc $3 2079698
653 $a Catholic
653 $a Church and State
653 $a Integralism
653 $a Liberalism
653 $a Natural law
653 $a Postliberalism
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0322
690 $a 0398
710 2 $a The University of Mississippi. $b Philosophy. $3 3188492
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 85-01.
790 $a 0131
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2023
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30488868