東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Investigating the Stanford Prison ex...

Le Texier, Thibault.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Investigating the Stanford Prison experiment = history of a lie /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Investigating the Stanford Prison experiment/ by Thibault Le Texier.
Reminder of title:	history of a lie /
Author:	Le Texier, Thibault.
Published:	Cham :Springer Nature Switzerland : : 2024.,
Description:	xiv, 196 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
[NT 15003449]:	Introduction -- 1. Posterity -- 2. Pre-written Conclusions -- 3. Toyon Hall -- 4. Manipulations -- 5. The Situation -- 6. Variations on a Surrealist Situation -- 7. A Surrealist Situation - Continued -- 8. More Fiction than Science -- 9. Conclusion: Nothing to Save but the Truth -- Acknowledgments -- Notes.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
Subject:	Social psychology - Experiments - 20th century. -
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49292-1
ISBN:	9783031492921

Investigating the Stanford Prison experiment = history of a lie /
Le Texier, Thibault.

Investigating the Stanford Prison experimenthistory of a lie /[electronic resource] :by Thibault Le Texier. - Cham :Springer Nature Switzerland :2024. - xiv, 196 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.

Introduction -- 1. Posterity -- 2. Pre-written Conclusions -- 3. Toyon Hall -- 4. Manipulations -- 5. The Situation -- 6. Variations on a Surrealist Situation -- 7. A Surrealist Situation - Continued -- 8. More Fiction than Science -- 9. Conclusion: Nothing to Save but the Truth -- Acknowledgments -- Notes.

In 1971, psychologist Philip Zimbardo ran the now famous Stanford prison experiment to show that prison could make normal people behave in pathological ways. Based on the first thorough investigation in the archives of the experiment and on interviews with about half of its participants, this book shows that the Stanford prison experiment is far from being scientific. In particular, the guards knew what results were expected from them, they were trained and supervised by the experimenters, and they were following a schedule and a set of rules written by the experimenters. The experimenters deceived the guards and made them believe they were not subjects. They also borrowed many elements from a previous student experiment without disclosing this information in their reports. The prisoners were not allowed to leave the experiment at will, and they were conditioned by the experimenters. The mock prison situation was unrealistic. Most participants did not forget they were participating in an experiment, and many responded to demand characteristics. The data was not collected properly. And the conclusions were pre-written according to non-academic aims. This book goes beyond the experiment to provide ample background and context, in order to understand how the experiment was planned, financed, recorded, and divulged in the press and within the academic. It discusses also the role played by Philip Zimbardo in the trial of one of the guards of Abu Ghraib, as well as the impact of mass media on science, the debates between personal psychology and social psychology, and the specific nature of cold war social science.

ISBN: 9783031492921

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-031-49292-1doiSubjects--Personal Names:

635992
Zimbardo, Philip G.
Subjects--Topical Terms:

3753874
Social psychology
--Experiments--20th century.

LC Class. No.: HM1011

Dewey Class. No.: 155.962

Investigating the Stanford Prison experiment = history of a lie /
LDR:03007nmm a22003495a 4500 001 2388671
003 DE-He213
005 20240809130229.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 250916s2024 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783031492921 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783031492914 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-031-49292-1 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-031-49292-1
040 $a GP $c GP
041 1 $a eng $h fre
050 4 $a HM1011
072 7 $a JMH $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PSY031000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a JMH $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 155.962 $2 23
090 $a HM1011 $b .L646 2024
100 1 $a Le Texier, Thibault. $3 3753873
240 1 0 $a Histoire d'un mensonge. $l English
245 1 0 $a Investigating the Stanford Prison experiment $h [electronic resource] : $b history of a lie / $c by Thibault Le Texier.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer Nature Switzerland : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2024.
300 $a xiv, 196 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
505 0 $a Introduction -- 1. Posterity -- 2. Pre-written Conclusions -- 3. Toyon Hall -- 4. Manipulations -- 5. The Situation -- 6. Variations on a Surrealist Situation -- 7. A Surrealist Situation - Continued -- 8. More Fiction than Science -- 9. Conclusion: Nothing to Save but the Truth -- Acknowledgments -- Notes.
520 $a In 1971, psychologist Philip Zimbardo ran the now famous Stanford prison experiment to show that prison could make normal people behave in pathological ways. Based on the first thorough investigation in the archives of the experiment and on interviews with about half of its participants, this book shows that the Stanford prison experiment is far from being scientific. In particular, the guards knew what results were expected from them, they were trained and supervised by the experimenters, and they were following a schedule and a set of rules written by the experimenters. The experimenters deceived the guards and made them believe they were not subjects. They also borrowed many elements from a previous student experiment without disclosing this information in their reports. The prisoners were not allowed to leave the experiment at will, and they were conditioned by the experimenters. The mock prison situation was unrealistic. Most participants did not forget they were participating in an experiment, and many responded to demand characteristics. The data was not collected properly. And the conclusions were pre-written according to non-academic aims. This book goes beyond the experiment to provide ample background and context, in order to understand how the experiment was planned, financed, recorded, and divulged in the press and within the academic. It discusses also the role played by Philip Zimbardo in the trial of one of the guards of Abu Ghraib, as well as the impact of mass media on science, the debates between personal psychology and social psychology, and the specific nature of cold war social science.
600 1 0 $a Zimbardo, Philip G. $3 635992
650 0 $a Social psychology $x Experiments $x History $y 20th century. $3 3753874
650 0 $a Social psychology $x Research $z United States $x History $y 20th century. $3 3753875
650 0 $a Social psychology $z United States $x History $y 20th century. $3 3753876
650 0 $a Prison psychology $z United States $x History $y 20th century. $3 3753877
650 1 4 $a Social Psychology. $3 3538421
650 2 4 $a Experimental Psychology. $3 2181949
650 2 4 $a History of Science. $3 896972
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 836513
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49292-1
950 $a Social Sciences (SpringerNature-41176)