語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Autogenous Mineralized and Partial Demineralized Dentin Graft Compared to Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft : = A Randomized Controlled Trial.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Autogenous Mineralized and Partial Demineralized Dentin Graft Compared to Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft :/
其他題名:
A Randomized Controlled Trial.
作者:
Perozo, Sandra.
面頁冊數:
1 online resource (119 pages)
附註:
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-11.
Contained By:
Masters Abstracts International84-11.
標題:
Dentistry. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30417640click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:
9798379587017
Autogenous Mineralized and Partial Demineralized Dentin Graft Compared to Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft : = A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Perozo, Sandra.
Autogenous Mineralized and Partial Demineralized Dentin Graft Compared to Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft :
A Randomized Controlled Trial. - 1 online resource (119 pages)
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-11.
Thesis (M.S.)--The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 2023.
Includes bibliographical references
Purpose: The aims of this study were 1) to evaluate clinically and radiographically differences in bone volume and density between particulate partial-demineralized dentin graft (PDDG), mineralized dentin graft (MDG) and freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA), and 2) to evaluate differences in terms of efficacy among partial-demineralized dentin graft, mineralized dentin graft and FDBA. Material and methods: Adult patients seeking extraction treatment at the University of Oklahoma, College of Dentistry were recruited for this study. Patients were randomly assigned to three groups: Group I: mineralized dentin graft (MDG), Group II: partial-demineralized dentin graft (PDD), Group III: FDBA. Clinical and radiographic measurements were taken using a custom stent that had positions for a bone caliper to be inserted at the buccal and lingual surfaces at 2 mm and 4 mm apical to the alveolar ridge of the target tooth. Clinical measurements were taken during extraction and 6 months after extraction (during implant placement). Radiographic alveolar bone changes of buccolingual ridge width, ridge height, and density were assessed on CBCT scans obtained at 2 weeks and 4 months postoperatively. Results: A total of 118 sites on 35 patients were clinically and radiographically analyzed. When comparing the differences of means between pairs of graft materials regarding alveolar ridge width and height changes, the differences between FDBA-PDDG and FDBA-MDG were statistically significant (p0.05). Height bone change for the FDBA group was -0.64 mm; the MDG group showed no change while the PDDG showed 0.11 mm of bone gain. At the level of 2 mm ridge width, changes for CBCT analysis for FDBA, MDG, and PDDG were -1.45 mm, -0.20 mm, and -0.11 mm, respectively; for clinical measurements the average bone change for the FDBA, MDG, and PDDG was -1.27 mm, -0.13 mm, and -0.07 mm, respectively. At the level of 4 mm, the average bone change for CBCT analysis for FDBA, MDG, and PDDG was -1.00 mm, -0.16 mm, and 0.13 mm, respectively; for clinical measurements, the average bone change for FDBA, MDG, PDDG was -0.98 mm, -0.04 mm, and 0.05, respectively. Ridge width changes at 2 mm, in both clinical and CBCT measurements were statistically significantly different by gender. Males had more bone loss than Females. No other measurements were significantly different by gender. Changes in 2 mm and 4 mm width measurements on CBCT and in clinical measurements were statistically significant for the group aged 30-50 when compared to > 50 age group. The > 50 age group reported less bone loss in width than the 30-50 age group. There was no statistical difference among graft materials when bone density was analyzed. Conclusion: PDDG and MDG showed less bone loss when compared to FDBA. As a result, PDDG and/or MDG used for ARP are more effective at mitigating dimensional bone volume reduction. Compared to FDBA, autogenous dentin grafts showed more promising results.
Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023
Mode of access: World Wide Web
ISBN: 9798379587017Subjects--Topical Terms:
828971
Dentistry.
Subjects--Index Terms:
Bone allograftIndex Terms--Genre/Form:
542853
Electronic books.
Autogenous Mineralized and Partial Demineralized Dentin Graft Compared to Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft : = A Randomized Controlled Trial.
LDR
:04374nmm a2200385K 4500
001
2365770
005
20231218204705.5
006
m o d
007
cr mn ---uuuuu
008
241011s2023 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020
$a
9798379587017
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI30417640
035
$a
AAI30417640
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$b
eng
$c
MiAaPQ
$d
NTU
100
1
$a
Perozo, Sandra.
$3
3706641
245
1 0
$a
Autogenous Mineralized and Partial Demineralized Dentin Graft Compared to Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft :
$b
A Randomized Controlled Trial.
264
0
$c
2023
300
$a
1 online resource (119 pages)
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
500
$a
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-11.
500
$a
Advisor: Masood, Farah.
502
$a
Thesis (M.S.)--The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 2023.
504
$a
Includes bibliographical references
520
$a
Purpose: The aims of this study were 1) to evaluate clinically and radiographically differences in bone volume and density between particulate partial-demineralized dentin graft (PDDG), mineralized dentin graft (MDG) and freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA), and 2) to evaluate differences in terms of efficacy among partial-demineralized dentin graft, mineralized dentin graft and FDBA. Material and methods: Adult patients seeking extraction treatment at the University of Oklahoma, College of Dentistry were recruited for this study. Patients were randomly assigned to three groups: Group I: mineralized dentin graft (MDG), Group II: partial-demineralized dentin graft (PDD), Group III: FDBA. Clinical and radiographic measurements were taken using a custom stent that had positions for a bone caliper to be inserted at the buccal and lingual surfaces at 2 mm and 4 mm apical to the alveolar ridge of the target tooth. Clinical measurements were taken during extraction and 6 months after extraction (during implant placement). Radiographic alveolar bone changes of buccolingual ridge width, ridge height, and density were assessed on CBCT scans obtained at 2 weeks and 4 months postoperatively. Results: A total of 118 sites on 35 patients were clinically and radiographically analyzed. When comparing the differences of means between pairs of graft materials regarding alveolar ridge width and height changes, the differences between FDBA-PDDG and FDBA-MDG were statistically significant (p0.05). Height bone change for the FDBA group was -0.64 mm; the MDG group showed no change while the PDDG showed 0.11 mm of bone gain. At the level of 2 mm ridge width, changes for CBCT analysis for FDBA, MDG, and PDDG were -1.45 mm, -0.20 mm, and -0.11 mm, respectively; for clinical measurements the average bone change for the FDBA, MDG, and PDDG was -1.27 mm, -0.13 mm, and -0.07 mm, respectively. At the level of 4 mm, the average bone change for CBCT analysis for FDBA, MDG, and PDDG was -1.00 mm, -0.16 mm, and 0.13 mm, respectively; for clinical measurements, the average bone change for FDBA, MDG, PDDG was -0.98 mm, -0.04 mm, and 0.05, respectively. Ridge width changes at 2 mm, in both clinical and CBCT measurements were statistically significantly different by gender. Males had more bone loss than Females. No other measurements were significantly different by gender. Changes in 2 mm and 4 mm width measurements on CBCT and in clinical measurements were statistically significant for the group aged 30-50 when compared to > 50 age group. The > 50 age group reported less bone loss in width than the 30-50 age group. There was no statistical difference among graft materials when bone density was analyzed. Conclusion: PDDG and MDG showed less bone loss when compared to FDBA. As a result, PDDG and/or MDG used for ARP are more effective at mitigating dimensional bone volume reduction. Compared to FDBA, autogenous dentin grafts showed more promising results.
533
$a
Electronic reproduction.
$b
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
$c
ProQuest,
$d
2023
538
$a
Mode of access: World Wide Web
650
4
$a
Dentistry.
$3
828971
650
4
$a
Medical imaging.
$3
3172799
653
$a
Bone allograft
653
$a
Mineralized dentin graft
653
$a
Graft materials
653
$a
Bone density
653
$a
Bone change
655
7
$a
Electronic books.
$2
lcsh
$3
542853
690
$a
0567
690
$a
0574
710
2
$a
ProQuest Information and Learning Co.
$3
783688
710
2
$a
The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center.
$b
Periodontics.
$3
3706642
773
0
$t
Masters Abstracts International
$g
84-11.
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30417640
$z
click for full text (PQDT)
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9488126
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入