東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Externalities of Nondisclosure : = Evidence from Corporate Investments and Competitors' Redacted Proprietary Information.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Externalities of Nondisclosure :/
Reminder of title:	Evidence from Corporate Investments and Competitors' Redacted Proprietary Information.
Author:	Chen, Xiangpei.
Description:	1 online resource (70 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-02, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-02A.
Subject:	Agreements. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28542207click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798522970161

Externalities of Nondisclosure : = Evidence from Corporate Investments and Competitors' Redacted Proprietary Information.
Chen, Xiangpei.

Externalities of Nondisclosure :Evidence from Corporate Investments and Competitors' Redacted Proprietary Information. - 1 online resource (70 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-02, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The George Washington University, 2021.

Includes bibliographical references

Firms can request to redact proprietary information from their material contracts under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Such redactions reveal a manager's decision to withhold information mainly due to proprietary cost concerns. This study investigates whether firms change their investments when a competitor redacts proprietary information from material contracts. I hypothesize that firms gain additional knowledge about growth opportunities and perceive signals about future competitiveness from a rival's redactions. I find that firms' R&D investments and capital expenditures increase after observing redactions from a rival's investment-related contracts and R&D/License/Collaboration agreements. The spillover effect is stronger for firms that operate in more competitive industries, when their product markets are less stable, and when a similar-sized competitor redacts proprietary information. Overall, my evidence suggests that externalities exist when firms withhold information, and such externalities stem from the information conveyed by the withholding behavior itself.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798522970161Subjects--Topical Terms:

3559354
Agreements.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Investment strategyIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Externalities of Nondisclosure : = Evidence from Corporate Investments and Competitors' Redacted Proprietary Information.
LDR:02582nmm a2200421K 4500 001 2365149
005 20231213130557.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2021 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798522970161
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28542207
035 $a AAI28542207
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Chen, Xiangpei. $3 3705973
245 1 0 $a Externalities of Nondisclosure : $b Evidence from Corporate Investments and Competitors' Redacted Proprietary Information.
264 0 $c 2021
300 $a 1 online resource (70 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-02, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Gore, Angela K.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The George Washington University, 2021.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Firms can request to redact proprietary information from their material contracts under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Such redactions reveal a manager's decision to withhold information mainly due to proprietary cost concerns. This study investigates whether firms change their investments when a competitor redacts proprietary information from material contracts. I hypothesize that firms gain additional knowledge about growth opportunities and perceive signals about future competitiveness from a rival's redactions. I find that firms' R&D investments and capital expenditures increase after observing redactions from a rival's investment-related contracts and R&D/License/Collaboration agreements. The spillover effect is stronger for firms that operate in more competitive industries, when their product markets are less stable, and when a similar-sized competitor redacts proprietary information. Overall, my evidence suggests that externalities exist when firms withhold information, and such externalities stem from the information conveyed by the withholding behavior itself.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Agreements. $3 3559354
650 4 $a Decision making. $3 517204
650 4 $a Competition. $3 537031
653 $a Investment strategy
653 $a Redaction
653 $a Proprietary information
653 $a Materials contracts
653 $a Competitor's investments
653 $a R&D
653 $a Withholding
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0272
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0501
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a The George Washington University. $b Accountancy. $3 3189783
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-02A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28542207 $z click for full text (PQDT)