東華大學圖書館 |

Causal Inference from Observational Data.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Causal Inference from Observational Data./
作者:	Vinh, Vo Thanh.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (169 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-04, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-04B.
標題:	Calculus. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29352714click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798352685235

Causal Inference from Observational Data.
Vinh, Vo Thanh.

Causal Inference from Observational Data. - 1 online resource (169 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-04, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--National University of Singapore (Singapore), 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

Humans tend to have a concept of causality: 'If I drink more tea, I will not sleep better.' Some schools of thought have asserted that this understanding is natural, while others have claimed that it is something we must learn through empirical observations (Leslie and Keeble, 1987). Causal inference is an important problem in science and many real-life applications. A major challenge is in estimating the effect of a treatment on causing an outcome, which are usually confounded by a common cause variable, namely the confounder. This leads to a number of problems. First, the confounder may not be a fixed quantity but changes over time. Its time-dependent property might contribute to bias in the estimates of causal effects. Second, the causal effects on different populations may be different. The data is scarce on some populations while more commonly available on others. In this case, a naive combination of the data sources might not be an ideal approach to learn causal effects in the population with scarce data because it would be dominated by the other populations. Third, learning causal effects might be limited by data privacy constraints. Different sets of data might be maintained at different sites and they cannot be shared to an outsider due to privacy right of the users, and thus limiting access of causal inference algorithms to the data.This dissertation is concerned with the methodologies of estimating causal effects in the three general contexts as described above, which are common in real life problems.To incorporate latent factors that change with time, we extend causal inference with stochastic confounders. We propose Causal Modeling with Stochastic Confounders (CausalSC), a new variational estimation for causal effects based on the well-known representer theorem but augmented to include a random input space. The causal effects involving latent confounders that are interdependent and time-varying from sequential, repeated measurements in an observational study are estimated. Our approach extends the recent work that assumes independent, non-temporal latent confounders, with potentially biased estimators. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this method on various benchmark temporal datasets.To address data scarcity in a target population, we propose an adaptive transfer (AdaTRANS) algorithm which exploits additional data sources to facilitate estimating causal effects for the target population. Specifically, we leverage additional source datasets, which share similar causal mechanisms with the target observations, to help infer causal effects in the target population. We propose three levels of knowledge transfer, including modeling of outcomes, treatments, and confounders. To transfer knowledge based on similarity of the sources and the target observations, we introduce learnable transfer factors that can adaptively control the transfer strength, and thus achieving a fair and balanced transfer of knowledge between the sources and target. This is done through an extension of the representer theorem-based algorithm introduced in the first work (CausalSC). Our proposed method can estimate causal effects in the target population without prior knowledge of the data discrepancy between additional data sources and the target. This contrasts with the cutting edge tools and techniques that usually assume that the data are come from the same distribution. Experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets show the effectiveness of the proposed method as compared with recent baselines.To preserve data privacy in causal inference, we present Federated Causal Inference (FedCI), which is a framework to learn a common causal model whilst keeping sensitive data at their local sites. This helps assess and integrate local causal effects from different private data sources without centralizing them. In particular, we estimate treatment effects on individual subjects from observational data using a non-parametric reformulation of a classical potential outcomes framework. Under the strong ignorability assumption in causal modelling, the proposed model can be decomposed into multiple components, each associated with a data fragment. Thus, it enables the model to be efficiently estimated from federated data sources. This naturally allows us to adapt and incorporate observational data of related studies to infer the causal effects of interest. To the best of our knowledge, our proposed FedCI is the first method that infers causal effects while preserving privacy. We demonstrate the promise of the proposed approach through a set of simulated and real-world benchmark examples.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798352685235Subjects--Topical Terms:

517463
Calculus.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Causal Inference from Observational Data.
LDR:05909nmm a2200361K 4500 001 2364751
005 20231212064410.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798352685235
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29352714
035 $a (MiAaPQ)USingapore218207
035 $a AAI29352714
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Vinh, Vo Thanh. $3 3705571
245 1 0 $a Causal Inference from Observational Data.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (169 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-04, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Yun, Leong Tze.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--National University of Singapore (Singapore), 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Humans tend to have a concept of causality: 'If I drink more tea, I will not sleep better.' Some schools of thought have asserted that this understanding is natural, while others have claimed that it is something we must learn through empirical observations (Leslie and Keeble, 1987). Causal inference is an important problem in science and many real-life applications. A major challenge is in estimating the effect of a treatment on causing an outcome, which are usually confounded by a common cause variable, namely the confounder. This leads to a number of problems. First, the confounder may not be a fixed quantity but changes over time. Its time-dependent property might contribute to bias in the estimates of causal effects. Second, the causal effects on different populations may be different. The data is scarce on some populations while more commonly available on others. In this case, a naive combination of the data sources might not be an ideal approach to learn causal effects in the population with scarce data because it would be dominated by the other populations. Third, learning causal effects might be limited by data privacy constraints. Different sets of data might be maintained at different sites and they cannot be shared to an outsider due to privacy right of the users, and thus limiting access of causal inference algorithms to the data.This dissertation is concerned with the methodologies of estimating causal effects in the three general contexts as described above, which are common in real life problems.To incorporate latent factors that change with time, we extend causal inference with stochastic confounders. We propose Causal Modeling with Stochastic Confounders (CausalSC), a new variational estimation for causal effects based on the well-known representer theorem but augmented to include a random input space. The causal effects involving latent confounders that are interdependent and time-varying from sequential, repeated measurements in an observational study are estimated. Our approach extends the recent work that assumes independent, non-temporal latent confounders, with potentially biased estimators. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this method on various benchmark temporal datasets.To address data scarcity in a target population, we propose an adaptive transfer (AdaTRANS) algorithm which exploits additional data sources to facilitate estimating causal effects for the target population. Specifically, we leverage additional source datasets, which share similar causal mechanisms with the target observations, to help infer causal effects in the target population. We propose three levels of knowledge transfer, including modeling of outcomes, treatments, and confounders. To transfer knowledge based on similarity of the sources and the target observations, we introduce learnable transfer factors that can adaptively control the transfer strength, and thus achieving a fair and balanced transfer of knowledge between the sources and target. This is done through an extension of the representer theorem-based algorithm introduced in the first work (CausalSC). Our proposed method can estimate causal effects in the target population without prior knowledge of the data discrepancy between additional data sources and the target. This contrasts with the cutting edge tools and techniques that usually assume that the data are come from the same distribution. Experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets show the effectiveness of the proposed method as compared with recent baselines.To preserve data privacy in causal inference, we present Federated Causal Inference (FedCI), which is a framework to learn a common causal model whilst keeping sensitive data at their local sites. This helps assess and integrate local causal effects from different private data sources without centralizing them. In particular, we estimate treatment effects on individual subjects from observational data using a non-parametric reformulation of a classical potential outcomes framework. Under the strong ignorability assumption in causal modelling, the proposed model can be decomposed into multiple components, each associated with a data fragment. Thus, it enables the model to be efficiently estimated from federated data sources. This naturally allows us to adapt and incorporate observational data of related studies to infer the causal effects of interest. To the best of our knowledge, our proposed FedCI is the first method that infers causal effects while preserving privacy. We demonstrate the promise of the proposed approach through a set of simulated and real-world benchmark examples.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Calculus. $3 517463
650 4 $a Asthma. $3 801640
650 4 $a Smoking. $3 643634
650 4 $a Exploitation. $3 562045
650 4 $a Hilbert space. $3 558371
650 4 $a Mortality. $3 533218
650 4 $a Neural networks. $3 677449
650 4 $a Cardiovascular disease. $3 3564561
650 4 $a Causality. $3 770986
650 4 $a Algorithms. $3 536374
650 4 $a Heart. $3 578987
650 4 $a Privacy. $3 528582
650 4 $a Computer science. $3 523869
650 4 $a Mathematics. $3 515831
650 4 $a Medicine. $3 641104
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0800
690 $a 0984
690 $a 0405
690 $a 0564
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a National University of Singapore (Singapore). $3 3352228
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-04B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29352714 $z click for full text (PQDT)