東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Food Safety Governance Frameworks and Regulations in the United States and China : = A Comparative Analysis.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Food Safety Governance Frameworks and Regulations in the United States and China :/
其他題名:	A Comparative Analysis.
作者:	Li, Xiaoxi.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (292 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-02, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-02A.
標題:	Food science. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30573271click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798380121194

Food Safety Governance Frameworks and Regulations in the United States and China : = A Comparative Analysis.
Li, Xiaoxi.

Food Safety Governance Frameworks and Regulations in the United States and China :A Comparative Analysis. - 1 online resource (292 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-02, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Minnesota, 2023.

Includes bibliographical references

This study analyzed agricultural trade between China and the U.S., revealing that exports reflect each nation's resource advantages-China's labor-intensive products and the U.S.'s mechanized, land-intensive goods. The food safety governance framework showed problems in both countries, with China suffering from unclear agency responsibilities and segmented management. While China's food safety standards are stringent, they lack operability and transparency, leading to public skepticism. Significant differences exist in import/export regulations and food item management between the countries, suggesting the need for traders to review these regulations carefully. China should consider developing technologies and aligning food standards nationwide. Further, more confirmed food safety cases suggest improved detection rather than increased incidents. Analyzing undergraduate education in food science showed China's emphasis on training food engineers, while the U.S. focuses on food scientists and safety technicians. This study suggests that China could benefit from a more practice-oriented curriculum. The COVID-19 pandemic emphasized the importance of food supply chain resilience, necessitating specific guidelines for food plants and staff sanitation. Overall, the study urges proactive information dissemination to reduce information asymmetry and increase public trust. Food-related legislation, regulatory agency role clarification, investment in education, and emergency preparedness are recommended for China and the U.S. to strengthen their food safety regulation.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798380121194Subjects--Topical Terms:

3173303
Food science.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Agricultural tradeIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Food Safety Governance Frameworks and Regulations in the United States and China : = A Comparative Analysis.
LDR:02983nmm a2200385K 4500 001 2363236
005 20231116093833.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2023 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798380121194
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30573271
035 $a AAI30573271
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Li, Xiaoxi. $3 1286980
245 1 0 $a Food Safety Governance Frameworks and Regulations in the United States and China : $b A Comparative Analysis.
264 0 $c 2023
300 $a 1 online resource (292 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-02, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Feirtag, Joellen.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Minnesota, 2023.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a This study analyzed agricultural trade between China and the U.S., revealing that exports reflect each nation's resource advantages-China's labor-intensive products and the U.S.'s mechanized, land-intensive goods. The food safety governance framework showed problems in both countries, with China suffering from unclear agency responsibilities and segmented management. While China's food safety standards are stringent, they lack operability and transparency, leading to public skepticism. Significant differences exist in import/export regulations and food item management between the countries, suggesting the need for traders to review these regulations carefully. China should consider developing technologies and aligning food standards nationwide. Further, more confirmed food safety cases suggest improved detection rather than increased incidents. Analyzing undergraduate education in food science showed China's emphasis on training food engineers, while the U.S. focuses on food scientists and safety technicians. This study suggests that China could benefit from a more practice-oriented curriculum. The COVID-19 pandemic emphasized the importance of food supply chain resilience, necessitating specific guidelines for food plants and staff sanitation. Overall, the study urges proactive information dissemination to reduce information asymmetry and increase public trust. Food-related legislation, regulatory agency role clarification, investment in education, and emergency preparedness are recommended for China and the U.S. to strengthen their food safety regulation.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Food science. $3 3173303
650 4 $a Agricultural engineering. $3 3168406
653 $a Agricultural trade
653 $a Public skepticism
653 $a China's labor-intensive products
653 $a Food safety regulation
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0359
690 $a 0601
690 $a 0539
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a University of Minnesota. $b Food Science. $3 1262936
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-02A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30573271 $z click for full text (PQDT)