東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Traumatic Injuries Outcomes.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Traumatic Injuries Outcomes./
Author:	Almaghrabi, Fatima Samir A.
Description:	1 online resource (139 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-01, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-01A.
Subject:	Comorbidity. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28431992click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798738604782

Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Traumatic Injuries Outcomes.
Almaghrabi, Fatima Samir A.

Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Traumatic Injuries Outcomes. - 1 online resource (139 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-01, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Manchester (United Kingdom), 2019.

Includes bibliographical references

This doctoral thesis aims to investigate the application of different machine learning techniques to improve outcome prediction in the trauma field. The thesis covers three topics to fulfil that aim. Firstly, an interpretable machine learning (IML) method based on vital sign variables for predicting trauma patients' outcomes is developed. It contains different methods, including a maximum likelihood evidential reasoning framework, belief rule-based inference methodology based on evidential reasoning, and a non-linear optimisation for parameter tuning. Common ML techniques have been applied to find the most accurate model for trauma outcome prediction. Furthermore, to enhance the prediction of trauma outcome, the prediction accuracy of multiple models based on vital sign features has been evaluated, as vital signs features are commonly collected in trauma centres and units. Secondly, the evidential reasoning (ER) rule is introduced for feature selection to highlight the key features impacting the outcomes. The ER rule finds the optimal weight for each feature that maximises the prediction accuracy during model training. Other feature selection methods have also been implemented, such as random forest and Relief: F. Thirdly, the ER rule has been applied for ensemble learning and has the advantage of adjusting the weight for each classifier in the ensemble learning process. In this thesis, two sets of trauma data are acquired to implement the proposed techniques. The results show that the IML method improves prediction accuracy over other common ML techniques. Similarly, the ER rule achieves good prediction accuracy after ensemble learning. The results highlight the role of the proposed feature selection techniques in finding the key predictors of patients' outcomes.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798738604782Subjects--Topical Terms:

838466
Comorbidity.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Trauma patientsIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Traumatic Injuries Outcomes.
LDR:03198nmm a2200397K 4500 001 2362492
005 20231102121804.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2019 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798738604782
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28431992
035 $a (MiAaPQ)Manchester_UK98d31143-ef77-4928-a270-0408584e57c0
035 $a AAI28431992
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Almaghrabi, Fatima Samir A. $3 3703221
245 1 0 $a Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Traumatic Injuries Outcomes.
264 0 $c 2019
300 $a 1 online resource (139 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-01, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Yang, Jian-Bo.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Manchester (United Kingdom), 2019.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a This doctoral thesis aims to investigate the application of different machine learning techniques to improve outcome prediction in the trauma field. The thesis covers three topics to fulfil that aim. Firstly, an interpretable machine learning (IML) method based on vital sign variables for predicting trauma patients' outcomes is developed. It contains different methods, including a maximum likelihood evidential reasoning framework, belief rule-based inference methodology based on evidential reasoning, and a non-linear optimisation for parameter tuning. Common ML techniques have been applied to find the most accurate model for trauma outcome prediction. Furthermore, to enhance the prediction of trauma outcome, the prediction accuracy of multiple models based on vital sign features has been evaluated, as vital signs features are commonly collected in trauma centres and units. Secondly, the evidential reasoning (ER) rule is introduced for feature selection to highlight the key features impacting the outcomes. The ER rule finds the optimal weight for each feature that maximises the prediction accuracy during model training. Other feature selection methods have also been implemented, such as random forest and Relief: F. Thirdly, the ER rule has been applied for ensemble learning and has the advantage of adjusting the weight for each classifier in the ensemble learning process. In this thesis, two sets of trauma data are acquired to implement the proposed techniques. The results show that the IML method improves prediction accuracy over other common ML techniques. Similarly, the ER rule achieves good prediction accuracy after ensemble learning. The results highlight the role of the proposed feature selection techniques in finding the key predictors of patients' outcomes.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Comorbidity. $3 838466
650 4 $a Mortality. $3 533218
650 4 $a Vital signs. $3 3683759
650 4 $a Injuries. $3 3563044
650 4 $a Hospitals. $3 616081
650 4 $a Clinical outcomes. $3 3682127
650 4 $a Patients. $3 1961957
650 4 $a Medicine. $3 641104
650 4 $a Trauma. $2 swd $3 1795334
650 4 $a Glasgow Coma Scale. $3 3703222
650 4 $a Computer science. $3 523869
650 4 $a Artificial intelligence. $3 516317
650 4 $a Health sciences. $3 3168359
650 4 $a Research. $3 531893
650 4 $a Accuracy. $3 3559958
650 4 $a Datasets. $3 3541416
650 4 $a Sampling techniques. $3 3685918
650 4 $a Objectives. $3 3561496
650 4 $a Academic libraries. $3 635314
650 4 $a Intellectual property. $3 572975
650 4 $a Decision making. $3 517204
650 4 $a Classification. $3 595585
650 4 $a Variables. $3 3548259
650 4 $a Copyright. $3 601694
650 4 $a Linear programming. $3 560448
650 4 $a Algorithms. $3 536374
653 $a Trauma patients
653 $a Machine learning
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0566
690 $a 0984
690 $a 0564
690 $a 0800
690 $a 0513
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a The University of Manchester (United Kingdom). $3 3422292
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-01A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28431992 $z click for full text (PQDT)