東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Reputation as the Key Link Amongst Moral Rights, Prohibited Marks, and Geographical Indications.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Reputation as the Key Link Amongst Moral Rights, Prohibited Marks, and Geographical Indications./
作者:	Tomic, Darinka.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (295 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-04, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-04A.
標題:	Access to information. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29366759click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798352613122

Reputation as the Key Link Amongst Moral Rights, Prohibited Marks, and Geographical Indications.
Tomic, Darinka.

Reputation as the Key Link Amongst Moral Rights, Prohibited Marks, and Geographical Indications. - 1 online resource (295 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-04, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Western Ontario (Canada), 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

Moral rights, prohibited marks, and geographical indications (GI) appear in Canadian intellectual property (IP) statutes and international IP instruments - but do not mirror the characteristics of the classic IP triad (patents, copyrights, and trademarks). The classic triad are alienable (tradeable, licensable, able to be transferred away by their owners). Moral rights, prohibited marks, and GI are inalienable (not able to be transferred to others by the persons entitled to them) and thus distinguishable from classic IP. This research demonstrates another characteristic setting moral rights, prohibited marks, and GI apart from classic IP: a common preoccupation with reputation or esteem. The Copyright Act's moral rights exist in performances and literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works, linking works and performances to their creators' identities (rights of paternity) and giving creators non-transferable rights to maintain their works' and performances' integrity. Listed in the Trademarks Act, prohibited marks are not to be used as trademarks, being reserved for designated persons, institutions, and governments to use. Found in the Trademarks Act, GI are not trademarks but symbols linked to quality and reputation which indicate place of origin on certain types of products. Protecting people's reputations is the tort of defamation's historic role, however, studying reputation in defamation is hampered by the continuing role of juries in Canadian civil and criminal defamation proceedings. Because Canadian jury deliberations are secret, even judges presiding over jury trials do not learn how juries use evidence when making findings involving reputation. The preponderance of Canadian defamation decisions arise from jury trials and discuss reputation only in generalities and abstract terms. In the judge-alone trials studied, no more specific reputation findings were found than in jury trials. Theoretical work on reputation in defamation (including that of Robert C. Post), then, was found not transferable to moral rights, prohibited marks or GI. Analyzing reputation in defamation, therefore, is not helpful to understanding reputation across moral rights, prohibited marks, and GI. Nonetheless, examination of moral rights, prohibited marks. and GI themselves demonstrates reputation in the sense of esteem and uniquely distinguishes the set of moral rights, prohibited marks, and GI from classic IP.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798352613122Subjects--Topical Terms:

3681263
Access to information.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Reputation as the Key Link Amongst Moral Rights, Prohibited Marks, and Geographical Indications.
LDR:03720nmm a2200337K 4500 001 2362176
005 20231027103327.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798352613122
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29366759
035 $a (MiAaPQ)oaiirlibuwocaetd11207
035 $a AAI29366759
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Tomic, Darinka. $3 3702891
245 1 0 $a Reputation as the Key Link Amongst Moral Rights, Prohibited Marks, and Geographical Indications.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (295 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-04, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Wilkinson, Margaret Ann.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Western Ontario (Canada), 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Moral rights, prohibited marks, and geographical indications (GI) appear in Canadian intellectual property (IP) statutes and international IP instruments - but do not mirror the characteristics of the classic IP triad (patents, copyrights, and trademarks). The classic triad are alienable (tradeable, licensable, able to be transferred away by their owners). Moral rights, prohibited marks, and GI are inalienable (not able to be transferred to others by the persons entitled to them) and thus distinguishable from classic IP. This research demonstrates another characteristic setting moral rights, prohibited marks, and GI apart from classic IP: a common preoccupation with reputation or esteem. The Copyright Act's moral rights exist in performances and literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works, linking works and performances to their creators' identities (rights of paternity) and giving creators non-transferable rights to maintain their works' and performances' integrity. Listed in the Trademarks Act, prohibited marks are not to be used as trademarks, being reserved for designated persons, institutions, and governments to use. Found in the Trademarks Act, GI are not trademarks but symbols linked to quality and reputation which indicate place of origin on certain types of products. Protecting people's reputations is the tort of defamation's historic role, however, studying reputation in defamation is hampered by the continuing role of juries in Canadian civil and criminal defamation proceedings. Because Canadian jury deliberations are secret, even judges presiding over jury trials do not learn how juries use evidence when making findings involving reputation. The preponderance of Canadian defamation decisions arise from jury trials and discuss reputation only in generalities and abstract terms. In the judge-alone trials studied, no more specific reputation findings were found than in jury trials. Theoretical work on reputation in defamation (including that of Robert C. Post), then, was found not transferable to moral rights, prohibited marks or GI. Analyzing reputation in defamation, therefore, is not helpful to understanding reputation across moral rights, prohibited marks, and GI. Nonetheless, examination of moral rights, prohibited marks. and GI themselves demonstrates reputation in the sense of esteem and uniquely distinguishes the set of moral rights, prohibited marks, and GI from classic IP.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Access to information. $3 3681263
650 4 $a Privacy. $3 528582
650 4 $a Copyright Act-Canada. $3 3702892
650 4 $a Lanham Act 1946-US. $3 3702893
650 4 $a Canadian studies. $3 2122858
650 4 $a Intellectual property. $3 572975
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0385
690 $a 0513
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a The University of Western Ontario (Canada). $3 1017622
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-04A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29366759 $z click for full text (PQDT)