東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Universal Legal Capacity and Adversarial Criminal Procedure : = Challenges in the Incorporation of Article 12 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Universal Legal Capacity and Adversarial Criminal Procedure :/
其他題名:	Challenges in the Incorporation of Article 12 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
作者:	McKillop, Matthew.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (141 pages)
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-10.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International84-10.
標題:	Evidence. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30347442click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798377678250

Universal Legal Capacity and Adversarial Criminal Procedure : = Challenges in the Incorporation of Article 12 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
McKillop, Matthew.

Universal Legal Capacity and Adversarial Criminal Procedure :Challenges in the Incorporation of Article 12 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. - 1 online resource (141 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-10.

Thesis (LL.M.)--McGill University (Canada), 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

The idea of universal legal capacity, arising from article 12 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, presents a challenge to adversarial systems of criminal procedure which premise procedural fairness on a defendant's mental capacity to actively participate in a trial. Special criminal procedure is used to assess fitness to stand trial and, if a defendant is found unfit, impose dispositions which may involve deprivation of liberty. A universally accessible criminal procedure, designed to eliminate special criminal procedure, could be implemented in adversarial jurisdictions in accordance with three models of change: maintaining adversarial criminal procedure but removing special criminal procedure; shifting from adversarial to inquisitorial criminal procedure; or implementing a "therapeutic" criminal procedure. By using a new institutionalist approach to analyse each of these potential models, I seek to demonstrate the formidable challenge of reforming adversarial criminal procedure in reliance on normative human rights-focused claims alone. Advocates of universal legal capacity seek to overcome deeply entrenched rationalist assumptions about the subject of criminal law: an autonomous individual with the capacity for reason. Adversarial criminal procedure marries normative appeal and functionality in an enduring manner, which the idea of universal legal capacity has not yet successfully challenged. The often-touted "paradigm shift" project underpinning the Convention cannot be meaningfully realised until a coherent alternative to adversarial criminal procedure is articulated.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798377678250Subjects--Topical Terms:

583147
Evidence.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Universal Legal Capacity and Adversarial Criminal Procedure : = Challenges in the Incorporation of Article 12 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
LDR:04828nmm a2200385K 4500 001 2362049
005 20231027103220.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798377678250
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30347442
035 $a (MiAaPQ)McGill_fn107407t
035 $a AAI30347442
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a McKillop, Matthew. $3 3702749
245 1 0 $a Universal Legal Capacity and Adversarial Criminal Procedure : $b Challenges in the Incorporation of Article 12 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (141 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-10.
500 $a Advisor: Beaudry, Jonas-Sebastien.
502 $a Thesis (LL.M.)--McGill University (Canada), 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a The idea of universal legal capacity, arising from article 12 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, presents a challenge to adversarial systems of criminal procedure which premise procedural fairness on a defendant's mental capacity to actively participate in a trial. Special criminal procedure is used to assess fitness to stand trial and, if a defendant is found unfit, impose dispositions which may involve deprivation of liberty. A universally accessible criminal procedure, designed to eliminate special criminal procedure, could be implemented in adversarial jurisdictions in accordance with three models of change: maintaining adversarial criminal procedure but removing special criminal procedure; shifting from adversarial to inquisitorial criminal procedure; or implementing a "therapeutic" criminal procedure. By using a new institutionalist approach to analyse each of these potential models, I seek to demonstrate the formidable challenge of reforming adversarial criminal procedure in reliance on normative human rights-focused claims alone. Advocates of universal legal capacity seek to overcome deeply entrenched rationalist assumptions about the subject of criminal law: an autonomous individual with the capacity for reason. Adversarial criminal procedure marries normative appeal and functionality in an enduring manner, which the idea of universal legal capacity has not yet successfully challenged. The often-touted "paradigm shift" project underpinning the Convention cannot be meaningfully realised until a coherent alternative to adversarial criminal procedure is articulated.
520 $a L'idee de capacite juridique universelle, decoulant de l'article 12 de la Convention relative aux droits des personnes handicapees, pose un defi aux systemes accusatoires de procedure penale, dont l'equite procedurale repose sur la capacite mentale d'un accuse a participer activement a un proces. Une procedure penale speciale est utilisee pour evaluer l'aptitude a etre juge et, si un accuse est juge inapte, lui impose des mesures pouvant entrainer une privation de liberte. Une procedure penale universellement accessible, concue pour eliminer cette procedure penale speciale, pourrait etre mise en oeuvre dans les juridictions accusatoires selon trois modeles de changement : maintenir la procedure penale accusatoire mais supprimer la procedure penale speciale ; le passage d'une procedure penale accusatoire a une procedure penale inquisitoire ; ou la mise en oeuvre d'une procedure penale « therapeutique ». En utilisant une approche neo-institutionnaliste pour analyser chacun de ces modeles potentiels, je cherche a demontrer le formidable defi que pose la reforme de la procedure penale contradictoire en s'appuyant uniquement sur les revendications normatives axees sur les droits de la personne. Les partisans de la capacite juridique universelle cherchent a surmonter les hypotheses rationalistes profondement enracinees sur le sujet du droit penal : un individu autonome dote de la capacite de raison. La procedure penale accusatoire possede a la fois un attrait normatif et fonctionnel que l'idee de capacite juridique universelle n'a pas encore reussi a remettre en cause. Le projet de « changement de paradigme » souvent vante qui sous-tend la Convention ne peut etre realise de maniere significative tant qu'une alternative coherente a la procedure penale accusatoire n'est pas articulee.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Evidence. $3 583147
650 4 $a Mental disorders. $3 728624
650 4 $a Equality. $3 520285
650 4 $a Court hearings & proceedings. $3 3562070
650 4 $a Defense. $3 3681633
650 4 $a Guardians. $3 3562919
650 4 $a Disabled people. $3 3562668
650 4 $a Intellectual disabilities. $3 3554807
650 4 $a Endorsements. $3 3563045
650 4 $a Criminal procedure. $3 623875
650 4 $a Juries. $3 3702750
650 4 $a Trials. $3 623874
650 4 $a Criminal law. $3 562467
650 4 $a Imprisonment. $3 1574475
650 4 $a Human rights. $3 527798
650 4 $a Equal rights. $3 3680448
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Criminology. $3 533274
650 4 $a Disability studies. $3 543687
650 4 $a Mental health. $3 534751
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0201
690 $a 0627
690 $a 0347
690 $a 0615
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a McGill University (Canada). $3 1018122
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 84-10.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30347442 $z click for full text (PQDT)