東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Linking Collaboration Dynamics and Outcomes in Collaborative Governance.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Linking Collaboration Dynamics and Outcomes in Collaborative Governance./
作者:	Bultema, Stephanie Anne.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (371 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-06, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-06B.
標題:	Public health. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29992391click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798358495029

Linking Collaboration Dynamics and Outcomes in Collaborative Governance.
Bultema, Stephanie Anne.

Linking Collaboration Dynamics and Outcomes in Collaborative Governance. - 1 online resource (371 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-06, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Colorado at Denver, 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

A person's health is mostly attributable to social factors like public policies, education, access to affordable housing, and social norms. This means that health clinics, hospitals, public health departments, and managed care plans cannot by themselves create and maintain healthy communities. Instead, they must work across boundaries by partnering with community-based organizations, schools, businesses, government agencies, and tribal nations to create community health systems that address the whole person needs of the populations served. Yet cross-boundary collaboration is complex, challenging, and not well understood. Little is known about how to best structure collaborative processes-or collaboration dynamics-to increase the chances of achieving collective outcomes like improved health equity. This dissertation aims to illuminate the murky pathways of collaboration dynamics using concurrent mixed methods and the integrative framework for collaborative governance to investigate how and why collaboration dynamics influence the outcomes of positive systems change, improved equity, and collaborative sustainability. The study population includes 22 ACHs in California and Washington and uses data drawn from surveys (n = 596), interviews (n = 85), focus groups (n = 6), meeting observations (n = 12), documents (n = 1,796), websites, and secondary data sources. Quantitative data were analyzed using structural equation modeling. Qualitative data were analyzed using theory-testing process tracing. Results show that specific collaboration dynamics can be leveraged to improve different outcomes. Specifically, findings suggest that systems change is positively influenced by the vision definition element of principled engagement, the mutual understanding element of shared motivation, and the knowledge and procedural and institutional arrangements elements of capacity for joint action; improved equity is positively influenced by the diverse inclusion element of principled engagement and the trust element of shared motivation; and sustainability is positively influenced by the data and procedural and institutional arrangements elements of capacity for joint action. Furthermore, process tracing shows how collaboration dynamics interact to produce causal chains leading to collaborative outcomes. Research findings present implications for collaborative governance theory and practice, since they pinpoint specific dynamics that can be leveraged to influence the CGR outcomes of positive systems change, improved equity, and collaborative sustainability.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798358495029Subjects--Topical Terms:

534748
Public health.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Collaborative governanceIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Linking Collaboration Dynamics and Outcomes in Collaborative Governance.
LDR:03998nmm a2200409K 4500 001 2361993
005 20231027103202.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798358495029
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29992391
035 $a AAI29992391
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Bultema, Stephanie Anne. $3 3702691
245 1 0 $a Linking Collaboration Dynamics and Outcomes in Collaborative Governance.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (371 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-06, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Heikkila, Tanya.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Colorado at Denver, 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a A person's health is mostly attributable to social factors like public policies, education, access to affordable housing, and social norms. This means that health clinics, hospitals, public health departments, and managed care plans cannot by themselves create and maintain healthy communities. Instead, they must work across boundaries by partnering with community-based organizations, schools, businesses, government agencies, and tribal nations to create community health systems that address the whole person needs of the populations served. Yet cross-boundary collaboration is complex, challenging, and not well understood. Little is known about how to best structure collaborative processes-or collaboration dynamics-to increase the chances of achieving collective outcomes like improved health equity. This dissertation aims to illuminate the murky pathways of collaboration dynamics using concurrent mixed methods and the integrative framework for collaborative governance to investigate how and why collaboration dynamics influence the outcomes of positive systems change, improved equity, and collaborative sustainability. The study population includes 22 ACHs in California and Washington and uses data drawn from surveys (n = 596), interviews (n = 85), focus groups (n = 6), meeting observations (n = 12), documents (n = 1,796), websites, and secondary data sources. Quantitative data were analyzed using structural equation modeling. Qualitative data were analyzed using theory-testing process tracing. Results show that specific collaboration dynamics can be leveraged to improve different outcomes. Specifically, findings suggest that systems change is positively influenced by the vision definition element of principled engagement, the mutual understanding element of shared motivation, and the knowledge and procedural and institutional arrangements elements of capacity for joint action; improved equity is positively influenced by the diverse inclusion element of principled engagement and the trust element of shared motivation; and sustainability is positively influenced by the data and procedural and institutional arrangements elements of capacity for joint action. Furthermore, process tracing shows how collaboration dynamics interact to produce causal chains leading to collaborative outcomes. Research findings present implications for collaborative governance theory and practice, since they pinpoint specific dynamics that can be leveraged to influence the CGR outcomes of positive systems change, improved equity, and collaborative sustainability.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Public health. $3 534748
650 4 $a Systems science. $3 3168411
653 $a Collaborative governance
653 $a Equity
653 $a Process tracing
653 $a Structural equation modeling
653 $a Sustainability
653 $a Systems change
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0573
690 $a 0790
690 $a 0454
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a University of Colorado at Denver. $b Public Affairs. $3 3172906
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-06B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29992391 $z click for full text (PQDT)