語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Leadership Strategies to Mitigate Alternative Dispute Resolution Grievances, Retaliation, and Revenge.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Leadership Strategies to Mitigate Alternative Dispute Resolution Grievances, Retaliation, and Revenge./
作者:
Washington, Andrew.
面頁冊數:
1 online resource (209 pages)
附註:
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-02, Section: A.
Contained By:
Dissertations Abstracts International84-02A.
標題:
Alternative dispute resolution. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29260467click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:
9798837522239
Leadership Strategies to Mitigate Alternative Dispute Resolution Grievances, Retaliation, and Revenge.
Washington, Andrew.
Leadership Strategies to Mitigate Alternative Dispute Resolution Grievances, Retaliation, and Revenge.
- 1 online resource (209 pages)
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-02, Section: A.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Walden University, 2022.
Includes bibliographical references
Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) has been an area of study among scholars since the 1970s. Critics have questioned protections, gaps in the literature, and inconsistencies in the law. The current study was essential for organizational leaders and EEOC facilitators to understand why the ADR process does not protect U.S. Federal government organizational leaders from unjustified or unreasonable claims and retaliation. The overarching research question addressed how the ADR process protected U.S. Federal government organizational leaders in Washington, D.C., Maryland, and Virginia from unjustified or unreasonable claims and retaliation. The purpose of this qualitative multiple case study and purposeful sampling was to produce a detailed description of 15 participants who worked at least 6 months as full-time or part-time as an organizational leader, 18 years or older, and experienced or observed retaliation. The data analysis included examining and interpreting data collection instruments such as reading interview transcripts and field notes and listening to audio recordings from transcription. Seven themes emerged, and the data showed that 10 participants felt protected, mediation was not enough, and proving false claims discouraged employees from filing complaints. The study contained recommendations for the EEOC and federal agencies to update policies and procedures and Title VII law to address deviant behavior in the workplace. Applying this study's findings may help scholars, practitioners, government organizational leaders of the EEOC, and federal agencies restore the social norms and promote positive social change.
Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023
Mode of access: World Wide Web
ISBN: 9798837522239Subjects--Topical Terms:
3168470
Alternative dispute resolution.
Subjects--Index Terms:
ADRIndex Terms--Genre/Form:
542853
Electronic books.
Leadership Strategies to Mitigate Alternative Dispute Resolution Grievances, Retaliation, and Revenge.
LDR
:03051nmm a2200409K 4500
001
2361960
005
20231027103151.5
006
m o d
007
cr mn ---uuuuu
008
241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020
$a
9798837522239
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI29260467
035
$a
AAI29260467
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$b
eng
$c
MiAaPQ
$d
NTU
100
1
$a
Washington, Andrew.
$3
3702656
245
1 0
$a
Leadership Strategies to Mitigate Alternative Dispute Resolution Grievances, Retaliation, and Revenge.
264
0
$c
2022
300
$a
1 online resource (209 pages)
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
500
$a
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-02, Section: A.
500
$a
Advisor: Butkiewicz, Thomas.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Walden University, 2022.
504
$a
Includes bibliographical references
520
$a
Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) has been an area of study among scholars since the 1970s. Critics have questioned protections, gaps in the literature, and inconsistencies in the law. The current study was essential for organizational leaders and EEOC facilitators to understand why the ADR process does not protect U.S. Federal government organizational leaders from unjustified or unreasonable claims and retaliation. The overarching research question addressed how the ADR process protected U.S. Federal government organizational leaders in Washington, D.C., Maryland, and Virginia from unjustified or unreasonable claims and retaliation. The purpose of this qualitative multiple case study and purposeful sampling was to produce a detailed description of 15 participants who worked at least 6 months as full-time or part-time as an organizational leader, 18 years or older, and experienced or observed retaliation. The data analysis included examining and interpreting data collection instruments such as reading interview transcripts and field notes and listening to audio recordings from transcription. Seven themes emerged, and the data showed that 10 participants felt protected, mediation was not enough, and proving false claims discouraged employees from filing complaints. The study contained recommendations for the EEOC and federal agencies to update policies and procedures and Title VII law to address deviant behavior in the workplace. Applying this study's findings may help scholars, practitioners, government organizational leaders of the EEOC, and federal agencies restore the social norms and promote positive social change.
533
$a
Electronic reproduction.
$b
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
$c
ProQuest,
$d
2023
538
$a
Mode of access: World Wide Web
650
4
$a
Alternative dispute resolution.
$3
3168470
653
$a
ADR
653
$a
Alternative dispute resolution
653
$a
EEOC
653
$a
Grievances
653
$a
Retaliation
653
$a
Revenge
655
7
$a
Electronic books.
$2
lcsh
$3
542853
690
$a
0454
690
$a
0310
690
$a
0649
710
2
$a
ProQuest Information and Learning Co.
$3
783688
710
2
$a
Walden University.
$b
Management.
$3
3168394
773
0
$t
Dissertations Abstracts International
$g
84-02A.
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29260467
$z
click for full text (PQDT)
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9484316
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入