東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Comparing the Effectiveness of Surgical Intervention versus Conservative Rehabilitation in Patients with Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Meniscal Injuries.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Comparing the Effectiveness of Surgical Intervention versus Conservative Rehabilitation in Patients with Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Meniscal Injuries./
作者:	Pottenger, Seth.
其他作者:	Liu, Kevin,
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (63 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-05, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-05B.
標題:	Physical therapy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29992010click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798357577832

Comparing the Effectiveness of Surgical Intervention versus Conservative Rehabilitation in Patients with Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Meniscal Injuries.
Pottenger, Seth.

Comparing the Effectiveness of Surgical Intervention versus Conservative Rehabilitation in Patients with Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Meniscal Injuries. - 1 online resource (63 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-05, Section: B.

Thesis (D.P.T.)--Azusa Pacific University, 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

Background. The knee is one of the most commonly injured joints in the body. Many structures of the knee that provide support and stability can be injured. The primary goal of this systematic review (SR) is to compare conservative treatment and surgical approaches for an injury to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Similarly, the critically appraised topic (CAT) is aimed at providing insight into whether conventional treatment or a surgical approach is best for treating individuals with meniscus injury. Methods. A comprehensive search was performed between January 2022 and March 2022. These searches were conducted by four independent reviewers for both the SR and the CAT. Five databases, including PubMed, Medline, Cumulative Index Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), were utilized. Similar approaches were used in the selection of articles for both the SR and the CAT. The initial screening was performed based on population, intervention, comparison, outcome measurement, inclusion criteria, and exclusion criteria. Once these articles were retrieved, each reviewer screened for duplicates, non-relevant articles, and articles that were of a low level of evidence. An independent reviewer appraised the articles to identify any biases by using the PEDro and National Institute of Health-National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute tools for the SR and the CAT. Results. Thirteen articles were included for appraisal, which consisted of seven SRs and six randomized control trials. Out of the three articles utilized in the CAT, two were SRs with meta-analyses and one sole SR. Conclusions. Both conservative treatment and surgical treatment are effective in treating ACL injuries. However, there was insufficient data to suggest one over the other in terms of reducing pain. Clinicians should consider the overall patient presentation and severity of ACL damage to make recommendations on a case-by-case basis. The limitations of the SR were that the results are only generalizable to the adult population. Additionally, a wide variety of interventions led to variations in study designs. The quality of evidence was fair to good. As for the CAT, no significant differences were found in comparing conservative and surgical treatment approaches. Conservative treatment should be considered as the first line of intervention before proceeding with surgery.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798357577832Subjects--Topical Terms:

588713
Physical therapy.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Anterior cruciate ligamentIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Comparing the Effectiveness of Surgical Intervention versus Conservative Rehabilitation in Patients with Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Meniscal Injuries.
LDR:03918nmm a2200409K 4500 001 2361531
005 20231019095646.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798357577832
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29992010
035 $a AAI29992010
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Pottenger, Seth. $3 3702204
245 1 0 $a Comparing the Effectiveness of Surgical Intervention versus Conservative Rehabilitation in Patients with Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Meniscal Injuries.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (63 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-05, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Yohannes, Abebaw.
502 $a Thesis (D.P.T.)--Azusa Pacific University, 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Background. The knee is one of the most commonly injured joints in the body. Many structures of the knee that provide support and stability can be injured. The primary goal of this systematic review (SR) is to compare conservative treatment and surgical approaches for an injury to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Similarly, the critically appraised topic (CAT) is aimed at providing insight into whether conventional treatment or a surgical approach is best for treating individuals with meniscus injury. Methods. A comprehensive search was performed between January 2022 and March 2022. These searches were conducted by four independent reviewers for both the SR and the CAT. Five databases, including PubMed, Medline, Cumulative Index Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), were utilized. Similar approaches were used in the selection of articles for both the SR and the CAT. The initial screening was performed based on population, intervention, comparison, outcome measurement, inclusion criteria, and exclusion criteria. Once these articles were retrieved, each reviewer screened for duplicates, non-relevant articles, and articles that were of a low level of evidence. An independent reviewer appraised the articles to identify any biases by using the PEDro and National Institute of Health-National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute tools for the SR and the CAT. Results. Thirteen articles were included for appraisal, which consisted of seven SRs and six randomized control trials. Out of the three articles utilized in the CAT, two were SRs with meta-analyses and one sole SR. Conclusions. Both conservative treatment and surgical treatment are effective in treating ACL injuries. However, there was insufficient data to suggest one over the other in terms of reducing pain. Clinicians should consider the overall patient presentation and severity of ACL damage to make recommendations on a case-by-case basis. The limitations of the SR were that the results are only generalizable to the adult population. Additionally, a wide variety of interventions led to variations in study designs. The quality of evidence was fair to good. As for the CAT, no significant differences were found in comparing conservative and surgical treatment approaches. Conservative treatment should be considered as the first line of intervention before proceeding with surgery.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Physical therapy. $3 588713
650 4 $a Biomechanics. $3 548685
650 4 $a Biology. $3 522710
653 $a Anterior cruciate ligament
653 $a Conservative treatment
653 $a Conventional treatment
653 $a Knee pain
653 $a Physical therapy
653 $a Surgery
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0382
690 $a 0648
690 $a 0306
700 1 $a Liu, Kevin, $e author. $3 3702205
700 1 $a Jung, Jacob, $e author. $3 3702206
700 1 $a Barron, Brando, $e author. $3 3702207
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a Azusa Pacific University. $b Physical Therapy. $3 3286106
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-05B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29992010 $z click for full text (PQDT)