語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Development and Initial Validation of the Parent and Family Engagement in Higher Education Measure.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Development and Initial Validation of the Parent and Family Engagement in Higher Education Measure./
作者:
McNulty, Michelle R.
面頁冊數:
1 online resource (165 pages)
附註:
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-11, Section: B.
Contained By:
Dissertations Abstracts International83-11B.
標題:
Individual & family studies. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29064987click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:
9798438738169
Development and Initial Validation of the Parent and Family Engagement in Higher Education Measure.
McNulty, Michelle R.
Development and Initial Validation of the Parent and Family Engagement in Higher Education Measure.
- 1 online resource (165 pages)
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-11, Section: B.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of South Florida, 2022.
Includes bibliographical references
Throughout the history of higher education in the United States, parents and family members of college students have often found themselves as obsolete to the postsecondary experience. Minimal research has been dedicated to understanding the experience of parents and family members of college students until the millennial generation began their collegiate years (Harper et al., 2012; Wartman & Savage, 2008). In consideration of a new generation of college students (i.e., Gen Z) and the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 global pandemic, it is crucial to illuminate the complexities of parent and family engagement in higher education and the needs of parents and families. Most recently, Kiyama and Harper (2018) proposed a Model of Parent Characteristics, Engagement, and Support based on their research. Harper et al. (2020) continued to investigate this model through qualitative methodologies and identified several constructs to better understand this complex phenomenon. Currently, no quantitative tools exist to measure Kiyama and Harper's (2018) model and accompanying construct. Thus, the goal of this study was to develop and initially validate the Parent and Family Engagement in Higher Education (PFEHE) measure as a quantitative research tool to complement Kiyama and Harper's (2018) model. This dissertation is the beginning of the ongoing and iterative process researchers need to develop and gather validity evidence for any measure (Bandalos, 2018; Kline, 2016). Strength of evidence supporting validity, reliability, and fairness were evaluated for the PFEHE measure. Evidence to support validity was based on test content, response processes, and internal structure and was mixed. Higher education and measurement experts and current family members of undergraduate college students assisted the development process resulting in a 54-item PFEHE measure. A wide recruitment effort garnered participation of more than 1,000 participants who completed the 54-item measure. After a thorough data screening process, 650 responses were viable to use for a variety of analyses. Approximately half of these responses were used in a series of exploratory factor analyses. These analyses further refined the PFEHE measure to 21 items representative of three constructs: family aspirational characteristics, family/student involvement and engagement, and family/university involvement and engagement. The other half of responses were used for a confirmatory factor analysis with the three factors and 21 items. Results of this analysis were less than favorable as no model fit indices met the minimum standards (DiStefano & Hess, 2005; Kline, 2016; McCoach et al., 2013). Strength of evidence based on reliability was gathered by calculating Cronbach's alpha separately for the two samples using the redefined 21-item measure. Reliability measures for each of the three scales across both samples ranged from .76 to .84, indicating moderately strong evidence. Finally, evidence to support fairness of the PFEHE measure was gathered initially from expert panel review. Additional evidence was gathered from cognitive interviews conducted with current parents and family members of undergraduate college students. Families were asked to recall the information needed to respond to each item and whether they would respond to each item honestly. Their responses guided the final wording for items and the inclusion of additional instructions for participants. Collectively, the strength of evidence supporting fairness was strong given the scope of this study. This study concludes with a discussion about the many opportunities the PFEHE measure could be used in future quantitative and qualitative research studies. The evidence reported in this study is promising for the PFEHE measure, and future research will aid in the evaluation of more evidence of validity, reliability, and fairness.
Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023
Mode of access: World Wide Web
ISBN: 9798438738169Subjects--Topical Terms:
2122770
Individual & family studies.
Subjects--Index Terms:
Postsecondary experienceIndex Terms--Genre/Form:
542853
Electronic books.
Development and Initial Validation of the Parent and Family Engagement in Higher Education Measure.
LDR
:05290nmm a2200385K 4500
001
2361240
005
20231023072122.5
006
m o d
007
cr mn ---uuuuu
008
241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020
$a
9798438738169
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI29064987
035
$a
AAI29064987
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$b
eng
$c
MiAaPQ
$d
NTU
100
1
$a
McNulty, Michelle R.
$3
3701896
245
1 0
$a
Development and Initial Validation of the Parent and Family Engagement in Higher Education Measure.
264
0
$c
2022
300
$a
1 online resource (165 pages)
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
500
$a
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-11, Section: B.
500
$a
Advisor: Dedrick, Robert.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of South Florida, 2022.
504
$a
Includes bibliographical references
520
$a
Throughout the history of higher education in the United States, parents and family members of college students have often found themselves as obsolete to the postsecondary experience. Minimal research has been dedicated to understanding the experience of parents and family members of college students until the millennial generation began their collegiate years (Harper et al., 2012; Wartman & Savage, 2008). In consideration of a new generation of college students (i.e., Gen Z) and the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 global pandemic, it is crucial to illuminate the complexities of parent and family engagement in higher education and the needs of parents and families. Most recently, Kiyama and Harper (2018) proposed a Model of Parent Characteristics, Engagement, and Support based on their research. Harper et al. (2020) continued to investigate this model through qualitative methodologies and identified several constructs to better understand this complex phenomenon. Currently, no quantitative tools exist to measure Kiyama and Harper's (2018) model and accompanying construct. Thus, the goal of this study was to develop and initially validate the Parent and Family Engagement in Higher Education (PFEHE) measure as a quantitative research tool to complement Kiyama and Harper's (2018) model. This dissertation is the beginning of the ongoing and iterative process researchers need to develop and gather validity evidence for any measure (Bandalos, 2018; Kline, 2016). Strength of evidence supporting validity, reliability, and fairness were evaluated for the PFEHE measure. Evidence to support validity was based on test content, response processes, and internal structure and was mixed. Higher education and measurement experts and current family members of undergraduate college students assisted the development process resulting in a 54-item PFEHE measure. A wide recruitment effort garnered participation of more than 1,000 participants who completed the 54-item measure. After a thorough data screening process, 650 responses were viable to use for a variety of analyses. Approximately half of these responses were used in a series of exploratory factor analyses. These analyses further refined the PFEHE measure to 21 items representative of three constructs: family aspirational characteristics, family/student involvement and engagement, and family/university involvement and engagement. The other half of responses were used for a confirmatory factor analysis with the three factors and 21 items. Results of this analysis were less than favorable as no model fit indices met the minimum standards (DiStefano & Hess, 2005; Kline, 2016; McCoach et al., 2013). Strength of evidence based on reliability was gathered by calculating Cronbach's alpha separately for the two samples using the redefined 21-item measure. Reliability measures for each of the three scales across both samples ranged from .76 to .84, indicating moderately strong evidence. Finally, evidence to support fairness of the PFEHE measure was gathered initially from expert panel review. Additional evidence was gathered from cognitive interviews conducted with current parents and family members of undergraduate college students. Families were asked to recall the information needed to respond to each item and whether they would respond to each item honestly. Their responses guided the final wording for items and the inclusion of additional instructions for participants. Collectively, the strength of evidence supporting fairness was strong given the scope of this study. This study concludes with a discussion about the many opportunities the PFEHE measure could be used in future quantitative and qualitative research studies. The evidence reported in this study is promising for the PFEHE measure, and future research will aid in the evaluation of more evidence of validity, reliability, and fairness.
533
$a
Electronic reproduction.
$b
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
$c
ProQuest,
$d
2023
538
$a
Mode of access: World Wide Web
650
4
$a
Individual & family studies.
$3
2122770
650
4
$a
Higher education.
$3
641065
650
4
$a
Macroecology.
$3
3188544
653
$a
Postsecondary experience
653
$a
Psychometric testing
653
$a
Undergraduate students
653
$a
Recruitment efforts
655
7
$a
Electronic books.
$2
lcsh
$3
542853
690
$a
0745
690
$a
0420
690
$a
0628
710
2
$a
ProQuest Information and Learning Co.
$3
783688
710
2
$a
University of South Florida.
$b
Educational Measurement and Research.
$3
1681700
773
0
$t
Dissertations Abstracts International
$g
83-11B.
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29064987
$z
click for full text (PQDT)
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9483596
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入