東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Machine Learning Applications for Core Guided Petrophysical Analysis.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Machine Learning Applications for Core Guided Petrophysical Analysis./
作者:	Alabbad, Maitham A.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (120 pages)
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-01.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International83-01.
標題:	Geophysics. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28415282click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798516978937

Machine Learning Applications for Core Guided Petrophysical Analysis.
Alabbad, Maitham A.

Machine Learning Applications for Core Guided Petrophysical Analysis. - 1 online resource (120 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-01.

Thesis (M.S.)--Colorado School of Mines, 2021.

Includes bibliographical references

Rock physics models are used to characterize and quantify rock properties such as reservoir quality or fluid saturation. The factors that control these rock properties are complex, and they require numerous assumptions and approximations. Good data quality is essential for reliable and consistent interpretation. In this thesis, I present two methods for gas hydrate saturation estimation using well log and core data, namely the resistivity method, and the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) - density method. Then, I show the discrepancy between the two models to highlight the data quality issues. After that, I present an analysis of several supervised learning algorithms to produce synthetic density and porosity logs using pressure-core data as ground truth and ultimately improve saturation estimation. Also, I apply an unsupervised learning algorithm to correlate the saturation estimation values from the resistivity method with different clusters of the raw NMR T2 spectrum.I compared the theories, underlining assumptions, strengths, and weaknesses of the two saturation estimation methods. After that, I apply a forward modeling technique for estimating the velocity effect of gas hydrate using the saturation estimation curves. Then, I discuss the supervised machine learning workflow from data preparation, feature selection, model selection, and model evaluations. Four supervised machine learning algorithms were selected for model evaluation, namely linear regression (LR), random forest regressor (RF), multilayer perceptron (MLP), and long short-term memory (LSTM). For the unsupervised learning, the K-mean clustering algorithm was applied to classify NMR T2 spectra and correlated with our saturation estimation values.My results indicated that the resistivity method seems to be slightly better than the NMR-density method; it produced lower misfits between the measured and the modeled velocities and therefore considered more representative for estimating saturation. The machine learning analysis showed that the deep neural network LSTM model had the best overall performance. The LSTM model generated density and porosity logs which reduced the mean error by 50% and produced a more reliable saturation analysis. The unsupervised learning result showed that there is a correlation between the estimated gas saturation value from the resistivity log and the NMR T2 amplitude signal, which suggests the raw NMR T2 spectra are sensitive to the presence of free gas.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798516978937Subjects--Topical Terms:

535228
Geophysics.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Core to logIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Machine Learning Applications for Core Guided Petrophysical Analysis.
LDR:03908nmm a2200445K 4500 001 2360827
005 20231015185427.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2021 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798516978937
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28415282
035 $a AAI28415282
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Alabbad, Maitham A. $3 3701461
245 1 0 $a Machine Learning Applications for Core Guided Petrophysical Analysis.
264 0 $c 2021
300 $a 1 online resource (120 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-01.
500 $a Advisor: Prasad, Manika.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--Colorado School of Mines, 2021.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Rock physics models are used to characterize and quantify rock properties such as reservoir quality or fluid saturation. The factors that control these rock properties are complex, and they require numerous assumptions and approximations. Good data quality is essential for reliable and consistent interpretation. In this thesis, I present two methods for gas hydrate saturation estimation using well log and core data, namely the resistivity method, and the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) - density method. Then, I show the discrepancy between the two models to highlight the data quality issues. After that, I present an analysis of several supervised learning algorithms to produce synthetic density and porosity logs using pressure-core data as ground truth and ultimately improve saturation estimation. Also, I apply an unsupervised learning algorithm to correlate the saturation estimation values from the resistivity method with different clusters of the raw NMR T2 spectrum.I compared the theories, underlining assumptions, strengths, and weaknesses of the two saturation estimation methods. After that, I apply a forward modeling technique for estimating the velocity effect of gas hydrate using the saturation estimation curves. Then, I discuss the supervised machine learning workflow from data preparation, feature selection, model selection, and model evaluations. Four supervised machine learning algorithms were selected for model evaluation, namely linear regression (LR), random forest regressor (RF), multilayer perceptron (MLP), and long short-term memory (LSTM). For the unsupervised learning, the K-mean clustering algorithm was applied to classify NMR T2 spectra and correlated with our saturation estimation values.My results indicated that the resistivity method seems to be slightly better than the NMR-density method; it produced lower misfits between the measured and the modeled velocities and therefore considered more representative for estimating saturation. The machine learning analysis showed that the deep neural network LSTM model had the best overall performance. The LSTM model generated density and porosity logs which reduced the mean error by 50% and produced a more reliable saturation analysis. The unsupervised learning result showed that there is a correlation between the estimated gas saturation value from the resistivity log and the NMR T2 amplitude signal, which suggests the raw NMR T2 spectra are sensitive to the presence of free gas.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Geophysics. $3 535228
650 4 $a Petroleum engineering. $3 566616
650 4 $a Computer science. $3 523869
650 4 $a Artificial intelligence. $3 516317
650 4 $a Petrology. $3 535210
650 4 $a Datasets. $3 3541416
650 4 $a Regression analysis. $3 529831
650 4 $a Nuclear magnetic resonance--NMR. $3 3560258
650 4 $a Neural networks. $3 677449
650 4 $a Feature selection. $3 3560270
650 4 $a Methods. $3 3560391
650 4 $a Editing. $3 601456
653 $a Core to log
653 $a Gas hydrate
653 $a Machine learning
653 $a Neural network
653 $a Petrophysics
653 $a Rock physics
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0373
690 $a 0765
690 $a 0984
690 $a 0467
690 $a 0800
690 $a 0584
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a Colorado School of Mines. $b Geophysics. $3 3174445
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 83-01.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28415282 $z click for full text (PQDT)