東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A Dangerous Undertaking : = Appropriation Art, Intellectual Property, and Fair Use Since the 1990s.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	A Dangerous Undertaking :/
Reminder of title:	Appropriation Art, Intellectual Property, and Fair Use Since the 1990s.
Author:	Devine, Katherine de Vos.
Description:	1 online resource (429 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 78-11, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International78-11A.
Subject:	Art history. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10259687click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9781369725391

A Dangerous Undertaking : = Appropriation Art, Intellectual Property, and Fair Use Since the 1990s.
Devine, Katherine de Vos.

A Dangerous Undertaking :Appropriation Art, Intellectual Property, and Fair Use Since the 1990s. - 1 online resource (429 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 78-11, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Duke University, 2017.

Includes bibliographical references

This dissertation is a historical examination of the broad and multifaceted role of appropriation in twentieth and twenty-first century American art. It argues for the complementarity of research in legal and art theory with respect to the origins, significance, and future of appropriation and contends that the historical development of appropriation art is indissolubly interconnected with changes in intellectual property laws. This dissertation proposes that a history of contemporary appropriation requires an interdisciplinary approach, employing art historical, legal, and economic theory to examine interrelations between appropriation art, postmodern theory, and the legal doctrine of fair use. Special attention is paid to the development of terms used to describe and define appropriation art. The art historical definition of appropriation is traced through a review of academic criticism and museum exhibitions. The legal understanding of appropriation, which has a direct impact on the creation and dissemination of art that builds on prior works, is explored and clarified. Economic claims about artistic property rights and art markets are also considered and differentiated. Throughout, I question established understandings of appropriation and identify unresolved issues in the scholarly treatment of appropriation art. I draw distinctions between ethical and legal guidelines for reuse of images and suggest that further development of ethical guidelines is more important than further clarification of legal rules. Ultimately, I conclude that transformative use is a valuable framework for understanding appropriation, but conclude that judges cannot be expected to determine whether or not a work is transformative without expert guidance, preferably from artists themselves, and recommend that artists participate actively in the development of an ethical fair use.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9781369725391Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122701
Art history.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Appropriation artIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

A Dangerous Undertaking : = Appropriation Art, Intellectual Property, and Fair Use Since the 1990s.
LDR:03336nmm a2200397K 4500 001 2358832
005 20230830051454.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9781369725391
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10259687
035 $a (MiAaPQ)duke:13910
035 $a AAI10259687
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Devine, Katherine de Vos. $3 3699377
245 1 2 $a A Dangerous Undertaking : $b Appropriation Art, Intellectual Property, and Fair Use Since the 1990s.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (429 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 78-11, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Stiles, Kristine; Van Miegroet, Hans J.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Duke University, 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a This dissertation is a historical examination of the broad and multifaceted role of appropriation in twentieth and twenty-first century American art. It argues for the complementarity of research in legal and art theory with respect to the origins, significance, and future of appropriation and contends that the historical development of appropriation art is indissolubly interconnected with changes in intellectual property laws. This dissertation proposes that a history of contemporary appropriation requires an interdisciplinary approach, employing art historical, legal, and economic theory to examine interrelations between appropriation art, postmodern theory, and the legal doctrine of fair use. Special attention is paid to the development of terms used to describe and define appropriation art. The art historical definition of appropriation is traced through a review of academic criticism and museum exhibitions. The legal understanding of appropriation, which has a direct impact on the creation and dissemination of art that builds on prior works, is explored and clarified. Economic claims about artistic property rights and art markets are also considered and differentiated. Throughout, I question established understandings of appropriation and identify unresolved issues in the scholarly treatment of appropriation art. I draw distinctions between ethical and legal guidelines for reuse of images and suggest that further development of ethical guidelines is more important than further clarification of legal rules. Ultimately, I conclude that transformative use is a valuable framework for understanding appropriation, but conclude that judges cannot be expected to determine whether or not a work is transformative without expert guidance, preferably from artists themselves, and recommend that artists participate actively in the development of an ethical fair use.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Art history. $3 2122701
650 4 $a Intellectual property. $3 572975
653 $a Appropriation art
653 $a Contemporary art
653 $a Copyright
653 $a Intellectual property
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0377
690 $a 0513
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a Duke University. $b Art, Art History, and Visual Studies. $3 3185200
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 78-11A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10259687 $z click for full text (PQDT)