東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Virtual Reality Learning Self-Efficacy : = Does the Topic of VR Training Matter?

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Virtual Reality Learning Self-Efficacy :/
Reminder of title:	Does the Topic of VR Training Matter?
Author:	Saville, Jason Donald.
Description:	1 online resource (85 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-11, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-11B.
Subject:	Virtual reality. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30400527click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798379477202

Virtual Reality Learning Self-Efficacy : = Does the Topic of VR Training Matter?
Saville, Jason Donald.

Virtual Reality Learning Self-Efficacy :Does the Topic of VR Training Matter? - 1 online resource (85 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-11, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--North Carolina State University, 2023.

Includes bibliographical references

Virtual reality (VR) is increasingly being used for education and training, raising questions about how to assess the degree to which people feel competent learning through VR. In 2022, Saville and colleagues developed the Virtual Reality Learning Self-Efficacy Scale (VRLSE). The current experiment builds on their work. VR can be used for a wide range of training programs that vary with respect to the skill type and learning outcomes targeted. Whether the training content affects pre-training self-efficacy when VR is used for instructional purposes remains an open question. The present experiment tested whether the skill type and learning outcome targeted by a training program affect (a) how VRLSE scale items are interpreted; and (b) selfefficacy beliefs. A total of 831 participants recruited from the online research platform Prolific were randomly assigned to one of seven conditions resulting from a 2 (Skill Type: interpersonal or technical) x 3 (Learning Outcome: cognitive, skill-based, or affective) fully crossed factorial design plus a control group. Participants read about a hypothetical VR training program and provided ratings for VRLSE, potential moderators, and demographic items. Those in the control group read a generic vignette that did not specify skill type or learning outcome of the VR training. Those in the other six conditions read a vignette for VR first aid training highlighting one skill type and one learning outcome. Results confirmed prior work indicating the best-fitting model for the VRLSE scale is hierarchical, with one overall VRLSE factor and two subfactors of Learning and Interaction (Saville et al., 2022). Additionally, the VRLSE scale demonstrated measurement equivalence/invariance across all conditions. Finally, neither skill type nor learning outcome significantly affected the interpretation of VRLSE items or VRLSE beliefs themselves.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798379477202Subjects--Topical Terms:

527460
Virtual reality.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Virtual Reality Learning Self-Efficacy : = Does the Topic of VR Training Matter?
LDR:03120nmm a2200325K 4500 001 2358400
005 20230731112640.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2023 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798379477202
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30400527
035 $a (MiAaPQ)NCState_Univ18402040269
035 $a AAI30400527
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Saville, Jason Donald. $3 3698930
245 1 0 $a Virtual Reality Learning Self-Efficacy : $b Does the Topic of VR Training Matter?
264 0 $c 2023
300 $a 1 online resource (85 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-11, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Foster, Lori.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--North Carolina State University, 2023.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Virtual reality (VR) is increasingly being used for education and training, raising questions about how to assess the degree to which people feel competent learning through VR. In 2022, Saville and colleagues developed the Virtual Reality Learning Self-Efficacy Scale (VRLSE). The current experiment builds on their work. VR can be used for a wide range of training programs that vary with respect to the skill type and learning outcomes targeted. Whether the training content affects pre-training self-efficacy when VR is used for instructional purposes remains an open question. The present experiment tested whether the skill type and learning outcome targeted by a training program affect (a) how VRLSE scale items are interpreted; and (b) selfefficacy beliefs. A total of 831 participants recruited from the online research platform Prolific were randomly assigned to one of seven conditions resulting from a 2 (Skill Type: interpersonal or technical) x 3 (Learning Outcome: cognitive, skill-based, or affective) fully crossed factorial design plus a control group. Participants read about a hypothetical VR training program and provided ratings for VRLSE, potential moderators, and demographic items. Those in the control group read a generic vignette that did not specify skill type or learning outcome of the VR training. Those in the other six conditions read a vignette for VR first aid training highlighting one skill type and one learning outcome. Results confirmed prior work indicating the best-fitting model for the VRLSE scale is hierarchical, with one overall VRLSE factor and two subfactors of Learning and Interaction (Saville et al., 2022). Additionally, the VRLSE scale demonstrated measurement equivalence/invariance across all conditions. Finally, neither skill type nor learning outcome significantly affected the interpretation of VRLSE items or VRLSE beliefs themselves.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Virtual reality. $3 527460
650 4 $a Information technology. $3 532993
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0489
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a North Carolina State University. $3 1018772
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-11B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30400527 $z click for full text (PQDT)