Language:
English
繁體中文
Help
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
Login
Back
Switch To:
Labeled
|
MARC Mode
|
ISBD
Linked to FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Re-animating the Anatomy of a Mound : = Alternative Interpretation Strategies for Burial Mound Collections and NAGPRA Compliance Using New Materialism.
Record Type:
Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:
Re-animating the Anatomy of a Mound :/
Reminder of title:
Alternative Interpretation Strategies for Burial Mound Collections and NAGPRA Compliance Using New Materialism.
Author:
Stewart, Basil Jaime.
Description:
1 online resource (79 pages)
Notes:
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-01.
Contained By:
Masters Abstracts International84-01.
Subject:
Archaeology. -
Online resource:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29209942click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:
9798834051015
Re-animating the Anatomy of a Mound : = Alternative Interpretation Strategies for Burial Mound Collections and NAGPRA Compliance Using New Materialism.
Stewart, Basil Jaime.
Re-animating the Anatomy of a Mound :
Alternative Interpretation Strategies for Burial Mound Collections and NAGPRA Compliance Using New Materialism. - 1 online resource (79 pages)
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-01.
Thesis (M.A.)--State University of New York at Binghamton, 2022.
Includes bibliographical references
Although the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) was a major step forward for Indigenous rights in the United States, Indigenous conceptualizations of what constitutes burial objects often differ from the Euro-American perspectives that inevitably made their way into NAGPRA. As a result of this ontological discrepancy, well-meaning professionals following NAGPRA may not repatriate all the materials that have meaning for Indigenous descendants. Utilizing vibrant material assemblage theory (Bennett 2010) and ancestral agency (Crossland 2014), this research addresses the shortcomings of current burial material interpretations within museum collections and how these interpretations may affect the outcome of NAGPRA repatriations, specifically of burial mound assemblages. I explore this issue with a case-study: Cresap Mound, an Adena burial mound from West Virginia. I contrast how the material repatriation of Cresap Mound may be executed following NAPGRA's standard regulations and data from past burial mound repatriations with an alternative framework for interpretation rooted in materiality theory. The results show that before applying the alternative interpretations, Cresap Mound is at risk of only partial repatriation from an Indigenous ontological perspective. Following vibrant materiality, all the material contents of Cresap Mound including in any future repatriation inventory. These materials are vibrant members of the total assemblage and are essential for an expression of the Ancestral agency performed through the collection. This thesis demonstrates a method with which museums could further de-colonize the process of Indigenous burial repatriation. The interpretation of burial mound materials using new materiality can bridge the divide between Indigenous ontology and colonial archaeology to address the current colonial structure of American museums.
Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023
Mode of access: World Wide Web
ISBN: 9798834051015Subjects--Topical Terms:
558412
Archaeology.
Subjects--Index Terms:
Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA)Index Terms--Genre/Form:
542853
Electronic books.
Re-animating the Anatomy of a Mound : = Alternative Interpretation Strategies for Burial Mound Collections and NAGPRA Compliance Using New Materialism.
LDR
:03270nmm a2200349K 4500
001
2358251
005
20230731101815.5
006
m o d
007
cr mn ---uuuuu
008
241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020
$a
9798834051015
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI29209942
035
$a
AAI29209942
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$b
eng
$c
MiAaPQ
$d
NTU
100
1
$a
Stewart, Basil Jaime.
$3
3698790
245
1 0
$a
Re-animating the Anatomy of a Mound :
$b
Alternative Interpretation Strategies for Burial Mound Collections and NAGPRA Compliance Using New Materialism.
264
0
$c
2022
300
$a
1 online resource (79 pages)
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
500
$a
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-01.
500
$a
Advisor: McGuire, Randall.
502
$a
Thesis (M.A.)--State University of New York at Binghamton, 2022.
504
$a
Includes bibliographical references
520
$a
Although the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) was a major step forward for Indigenous rights in the United States, Indigenous conceptualizations of what constitutes burial objects often differ from the Euro-American perspectives that inevitably made their way into NAGPRA. As a result of this ontological discrepancy, well-meaning professionals following NAGPRA may not repatriate all the materials that have meaning for Indigenous descendants. Utilizing vibrant material assemblage theory (Bennett 2010) and ancestral agency (Crossland 2014), this research addresses the shortcomings of current burial material interpretations within museum collections and how these interpretations may affect the outcome of NAGPRA repatriations, specifically of burial mound assemblages. I explore this issue with a case-study: Cresap Mound, an Adena burial mound from West Virginia. I contrast how the material repatriation of Cresap Mound may be executed following NAPGRA's standard regulations and data from past burial mound repatriations with an alternative framework for interpretation rooted in materiality theory. The results show that before applying the alternative interpretations, Cresap Mound is at risk of only partial repatriation from an Indigenous ontological perspective. Following vibrant materiality, all the material contents of Cresap Mound including in any future repatriation inventory. These materials are vibrant members of the total assemblage and are essential for an expression of the Ancestral agency performed through the collection. This thesis demonstrates a method with which museums could further de-colonize the process of Indigenous burial repatriation. The interpretation of burial mound materials using new materiality can bridge the divide between Indigenous ontology and colonial archaeology to address the current colonial structure of American museums.
533
$a
Electronic reproduction.
$b
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
$c
ProQuest,
$d
2023
538
$a
Mode of access: World Wide Web
650
4
$a
Archaeology.
$3
558412
650
4
$a
Native American studies.
$3
2122730
650
4
$a
Public policy.
$3
532803
653
$a
Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA)
655
7
$a
Electronic books.
$2
lcsh
$3
542853
690
$a
0324
690
$a
0740
690
$a
0630
710
2
$a
ProQuest Information and Learning Co.
$3
783688
710
2
$a
State University of New York at Binghamton.
$b
Anthropology.
$3
1021760
773
0
$t
Masters Abstracts International
$g
84-01.
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29209942
$z
click for full text (PQDT)
based on 0 review(s)
Location:
ALL
電子資源
Year:
Volume Number:
Items
1 records • Pages 1 •
1
Inventory Number
Location Name
Item Class
Material type
Call number
Usage Class
Loan Status
No. of reservations
Opac note
Attachments
W9480607
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
On shelf
0
1 records • Pages 1 •
1
Multimedia
Reviews
Add a review
and share your thoughts with other readers
Export
pickup library
Processing
...
Change password
Login