東華大學圖書館 |

Cosmopolitan Approaches to International Law : = Finding the Right Lens to View the Freedom of Outer Space.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Cosmopolitan Approaches to International Law :/
其他題名:	Finding the Right Lens to View the Freedom of Outer Space.
作者:	Aganaba-Jeanty, Timiebi U.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (204 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-10, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International82-10A.
標題:	Councils. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28250838click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798597018270

Cosmopolitan Approaches to International Law : = Finding the Right Lens to View the Freedom of Outer Space.
Aganaba-Jeanty, Timiebi U.

Cosmopolitan Approaches to International Law :Finding the Right Lens to View the Freedom of Outer Space. - 1 online resource (204 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-10, Section: A.

Thesis (D.C.L.)--McGill University (Canada), 2016.

Includes bibliographical references

There appears to be a dominant position in interpreting the freedom of Outer Space which has not given much real significance to the idea of common benefit as that which enables this freedom. The reason that this causes difficulty is that there is an ambiguity to the concept of common benefit. This dominant position, however, sees the issue of benefit-sharing in the context of the perceived tension between established space faring nations and emerging and aspirant States and the idea that freedom could take on a different meaning depending on where one is on the scale of development. It fails to recognize that solutions to contemporary and historical space governance challenges have been much less oriented towards the interests of less developed States or new entrants, making the accrual and sharing of benefits dependent on the free will of those States able to carry out a variety of space activities independently. As a result of this, the debate around common benefit is exploited to seek individual benefit derived for a State as opposed to what our effort to use space collectively can generate. In recent times, the issue has not received much attention. This is because it is believed to be partly resolved through normative frameworks such as Article 1 of the Outer Space Treaty and the Space Benefits Declaration. While an attempt to re-address historical contentious issues, asserted to be resolved, may appear illusory or futile; such analysis can be useful depending on the account that the reader believes should be given to the normative character of human nature.To this end, the writings of legal, political and social theorists and methodologies from Critical Legal Schools may prove insightful for a deeper contextualization of the historical debate, the current understanding of the freedoms of Outer Space as well as unearth future perspectives to aid in addressing the current pressing space related issue of our time: Sustainability of Space Activities. Through the lens of Cosmopolitan Approaches to International Law (CAIL), this thesis proposes to investigate some of the perceived tensions prevalent in global space governance.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798597018270Subjects--Topical Terms:

3557627
Councils.
Subjects--Index Terms:

CosmopolitanIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Cosmopolitan Approaches to International Law : = Finding the Right Lens to View the Freedom of Outer Space.
LDR:05985nmm a2200397K 4500 001 2357681
005 20230725053640.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2016 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798597018270
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28250838
035 $a (MiAaPQ)McGill_n009w502z
035 $a AAI28250838
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Aganaba-Jeanty, Timiebi U. $3 3698210
245 1 0 $a Cosmopolitan Approaches to International Law : $b Finding the Right Lens to View the Freedom of Outer Space.
264 0 $c 2016
300 $a 1 online resource (204 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-10, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Janda, Richard.
502 $a Thesis (D.C.L.)--McGill University (Canada), 2016.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a There appears to be a dominant position in interpreting the freedom of Outer Space which has not given much real significance to the idea of common benefit as that which enables this freedom. The reason that this causes difficulty is that there is an ambiguity to the concept of common benefit. This dominant position, however, sees the issue of benefit-sharing in the context of the perceived tension between established space faring nations and emerging and aspirant States and the idea that freedom could take on a different meaning depending on where one is on the scale of development. It fails to recognize that solutions to contemporary and historical space governance challenges have been much less oriented towards the interests of less developed States or new entrants, making the accrual and sharing of benefits dependent on the free will of those States able to carry out a variety of space activities independently. As a result of this, the debate around common benefit is exploited to seek individual benefit derived for a State as opposed to what our effort to use space collectively can generate. In recent times, the issue has not received much attention. This is because it is believed to be partly resolved through normative frameworks such as Article 1 of the Outer Space Treaty and the Space Benefits Declaration. While an attempt to re-address historical contentious issues, asserted to be resolved, may appear illusory or futile; such analysis can be useful depending on the account that the reader believes should be given to the normative character of human nature.To this end, the writings of legal, political and social theorists and methodologies from Critical Legal Schools may prove insightful for a deeper contextualization of the historical debate, the current understanding of the freedoms of Outer Space as well as unearth future perspectives to aid in addressing the current pressing space related issue of our time: Sustainability of Space Activities. Through the lens of Cosmopolitan Approaches to International Law (CAIL), this thesis proposes to investigate some of the perceived tensions prevalent in global space governance.
520 $a Il semble exister, dans la maniere d'interpreter la liberte spatiale, une opinion dominante qui accorde peu d'importance a la notion d'un bien commun qui rend cette liberte possible. La complexite de la chose vient du fait que la notion de bien commun est elle-meme ambigue en soi. Cependant, cet avis dominant voit le probleme du partage du bien commun dans le contexte des tensions evidentes entre les grandes puissances spatiales, les etats emergents, et l'idee que la liberte prend un sens particulier dependamment du niveau de developpement. L'idee generale ne tient pas compte du fait que les solutions aux soucis de gouvernance spatiale, qu'ils soient anciens ou recents ont ete beaucoup moins garantes des interets des petites nations, rendant la gestion des benefices accumules totalement dependante du libre arbitre de ces etats capable d'effectuer de maniere independante toute une panoplie d'activites spatiales. Par consequent, a cause de cet etat de fait, le debat autour du bien commun est souleve de maniere a rechercher un benefice personnel pour chaque nation au lieu de s'axer autour des resultats que peuvent avoir une utilisation collective de l'Espace. Ces derniers temps, la problematique a recu peu d'attention. C'est parce que l'on croit qu'elle est partiellement resolue a travers des cadres normatifs tels que l'Article 1 du Traite de l'Espace et de la Declaration des Avantages de l'Espace. Alors qu'une tentative de soulever a nouveau des problematiques associees a des contentieux historiques, censes etre resolus, peut sembler illusoire ou futile, telle analyse peut etre utile, selon le degre d'importance que le lecteur accorde a l'essence de la nature humaine.A cette fin, les ecrits des theoriciens juridiques, politiques et sociales, ainsi que les methodologies des ecoles juridiques critiques peuvent s'averer judicieux pour une conceptualisation plus profonde du debat historique, la comprehension actuelle des libertes spatiales, en plus de deterrer des perspectives futures afin d'aider a adresser la problematique actuelle et pressante reliee a l'espace : la perennite des activites spatiales. A travers les lentilles de la nouvelle ecole de pensees que l'on appelle « Cosmopolitan Approaches to International Law » (CAIL), cette these propose des domaines a investiguer afin de trouver des solutions a certaines des tensions courantes percues dans la gouvernance spatiale globale.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Councils. $3 3557627
650 4 $a Cosmopolitanism. $3 590679
650 4 $a Cooperation. $3 594090
650 4 $a International law. $3 560784
650 4 $a Sustainability. $3 1029978
653 $a Cosmopolitan
653 $a International law
653 $a Freedom
653 $a Outer space
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0616
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a McGill University (Canada). $3 1018122
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 82-10A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28250838 $z click for full text (PQDT)