東華大學圖書館 |

Opening up Food System Transitions : = Exploring Diversity and Contributions of Producer Organizations, Value Chain Actors and Intermediaries.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Opening up Food System Transitions :/
其他題名:	Exploring Diversity and Contributions of Producer Organizations, Value Chain Actors and Intermediaries.
作者:	Kormelinck, Annemarie Groot.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (199 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-05, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-05A.
標題:	Innovations. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29877810click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798352977637

Opening up Food System Transitions : = Exploring Diversity and Contributions of Producer Organizations, Value Chain Actors and Intermediaries.
Kormelinck, Annemarie Groot.

Opening up Food System Transitions :Exploring Diversity and Contributions of Producer Organizations, Value Chain Actors and Intermediaries. - 1 online resource (199 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-05, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Wageningen University and Research, 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

Global agri-food systems are under unprecedented pressures. Various socioeconomic and environmental challenges are complex and interlinked, such as population growth, food and nutrition insecurity, social inequalities and poverty, climate change, resource scarcity, and biodiversity loss (Godfray et al., 2010; Ingram, 2011; Vermeulen et al., 2012; Willett et al., 2019). The Covid 19 pandemic has even more strongly shown vulnerabilities of current global agri-food systems (Bellamy et al., 2021; Rivera-Ferre et al., 2021). Food systems are at the core of several of the sustainable development goals, and were focal points in the United Nation's food systems summit in 2021. Both academia and leading global food and agriculture organizations urgently call for food systems to produce more healthy and nutritious food, and become more environmentally sustainable, inclusive and resilient (Barrett et al., 2020; FAO, 2020; IFAD, 2021; IFPRI, 2021; OECD, 2021; Webb et al., 2020; WEF, 2020).Food systems consist of actors and activities related to the production, processing, distribution, preparation and consumption of food, including markets and institutional networks, and the socio-economic and environmental outcomes of these activities (HLPE, 2017). Food system frameworks have become popular among academics, policymakers and practitioners for their systemic approach on the relations between external food system drivers, internal food system components, and their desired outcomes (Hospes and Brons, 2016; Ruben et al., 2019). Such systemic approach to food systems is expected to generate better scientific insights into underlying interactions and dynamics of food system change and generate opportunities for policy and practitioners to address food system challenges (Brouwer et al., 2020).Research on system transitions, through the lens of the multi-level perspective, conceptualizes transitions to occur through radical changes in emerging niches (e.g. sustainable alternatives, such as organic), or through more incremental changes in existing systems, so-called regimes (e.g. gradual improvements in food quality, safety or sustainability) - impacted by external drivers from the landscape (Geels, 2002). Although transition research has long overlooked agri-food systems (Markard et al., 2012), recent years witnessed an increase in studies on food system transitions (El Bilali, 2020; Melchior and Newig, 2021). Studies on food system transitions outline different research perspectives (e.g. Hebinck et al., 2021; Weber et al., 2020), develop typologies of food systems and their transition pathways (e.g. Gaitan-Cremaschi et al., 2019; Ollivier et al., 2018), and describe the emergence of niches and their interactions with regimes (e.g. Bui et al., 2016; Ingram, 2015).Food system transitions are multi-actor processes in which diverse types of actors need to collaborate and coordinate across various parts of the food system in orderto achieve desirable outcomes (Brouwer et al., 2020). Nonetheless, transition research, particularly the multi-level perspective, has been widely criticized for its poor conceptualization and representation of actors (e.g. de Haan and Rotmans, 2018; Fuenfschilling and Truffer, 2014; Genus and Coles, 2008; Shove and Walker, 2010; Smith et al., 2005). As a result, a growing number of studies analyse the contributions of different actor groups to food system and other transitions, for instance by studying actors from a business (Farla et al., 2012; Horisch, 2018), grassroots (Kump and Fikar, 2021; Seyfang and Smith, 2007) or transition intermediary perspective (e.g. Kivimaa et al., 2019; van Lente et al., 2003).However, different scholars indicate the need to improve the conceptualization of actors and to better understand their interactions and interdependencies (Fischer and Newig, 2016; Lamine et al., 2019; Wittmayer et al., 2017). Key literature reviews on the state of the art in transition research (Kohler et al., 2019; Markard et al., 2012) advocate that this research can benefit from intersecting with organizational theories to better understand how transitions are shaped by the interplay among different actors.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798352977637Subjects--Topical Terms:

754112
Innovations.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Opening up Food System Transitions : = Exploring Diversity and Contributions of Producer Organizations, Value Chain Actors and Intermediaries.
LDR:05540nmm a2200349K 4500 001 2355720
005 20230523083133.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798352977637
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29877810
035 $a (MiAaPQ)Wageningen598364
035 $a AAI29877810
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Kormelinck, Annemarie Groot. $3 3696160
245 1 0 $a Opening up Food System Transitions : $b Exploring Diversity and Contributions of Producer Organizations, Value Chain Actors and Intermediaries.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (199 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-05, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Bijman, W.J.J. ; Trienekens, J.H.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Wageningen University and Research, 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Global agri-food systems are under unprecedented pressures. Various socioeconomic and environmental challenges are complex and interlinked, such as population growth, food and nutrition insecurity, social inequalities and poverty, climate change, resource scarcity, and biodiversity loss (Godfray et al., 2010; Ingram, 2011; Vermeulen et al., 2012; Willett et al., 2019). The Covid 19 pandemic has even more strongly shown vulnerabilities of current global agri-food systems (Bellamy et al., 2021; Rivera-Ferre et al., 2021). Food systems are at the core of several of the sustainable development goals, and were focal points in the United Nation's food systems summit in 2021. Both academia and leading global food and agriculture organizations urgently call for food systems to produce more healthy and nutritious food, and become more environmentally sustainable, inclusive and resilient (Barrett et al., 2020; FAO, 2020; IFAD, 2021; IFPRI, 2021; OECD, 2021; Webb et al., 2020; WEF, 2020).Food systems consist of actors and activities related to the production, processing, distribution, preparation and consumption of food, including markets and institutional networks, and the socio-economic and environmental outcomes of these activities (HLPE, 2017). Food system frameworks have become popular among academics, policymakers and practitioners for their systemic approach on the relations between external food system drivers, internal food system components, and their desired outcomes (Hospes and Brons, 2016; Ruben et al., 2019). Such systemic approach to food systems is expected to generate better scientific insights into underlying interactions and dynamics of food system change and generate opportunities for policy and practitioners to address food system challenges (Brouwer et al., 2020).Research on system transitions, through the lens of the multi-level perspective, conceptualizes transitions to occur through radical changes in emerging niches (e.g. sustainable alternatives, such as organic), or through more incremental changes in existing systems, so-called regimes (e.g. gradual improvements in food quality, safety or sustainability) - impacted by external drivers from the landscape (Geels, 2002). Although transition research has long overlooked agri-food systems (Markard et al., 2012), recent years witnessed an increase in studies on food system transitions (El Bilali, 2020; Melchior and Newig, 2021). Studies on food system transitions outline different research perspectives (e.g. Hebinck et al., 2021; Weber et al., 2020), develop typologies of food systems and their transition pathways (e.g. Gaitan-Cremaschi et al., 2019; Ollivier et al., 2018), and describe the emergence of niches and their interactions with regimes (e.g. Bui et al., 2016; Ingram, 2015).Food system transitions are multi-actor processes in which diverse types of actors need to collaborate and coordinate across various parts of the food system in orderto achieve desirable outcomes (Brouwer et al., 2020). Nonetheless, transition research, particularly the multi-level perspective, has been widely criticized for its poor conceptualization and representation of actors (e.g. de Haan and Rotmans, 2018; Fuenfschilling and Truffer, 2014; Genus and Coles, 2008; Shove and Walker, 2010; Smith et al., 2005). As a result, a growing number of studies analyse the contributions of different actor groups to food system and other transitions, for instance by studying actors from a business (Farla et al., 2012; Horisch, 2018), grassroots (Kump and Fikar, 2021; Seyfang and Smith, 2007) or transition intermediary perspective (e.g. Kivimaa et al., 2019; van Lente et al., 2003).However, different scholars indicate the need to improve the conceptualization of actors and to better understand their interactions and interdependencies (Fischer and Newig, 2016; Lamine et al., 2019; Wittmayer et al., 2017). Key literature reviews on the state of the art in transition research (Kohler et al., 2019; Markard et al., 2012) advocate that this research can benefit from intersecting with organizational theories to better understand how transitions are shaped by the interplay among different actors.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Innovations. $3 754112
650 4 $a Agriculture. $3 518588
650 4 $a Food quality. $3 3696161
650 4 $a Food science. $3 3173303
650 4 $a Sustainability. $3 1029978
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0473
690 $a 0359
690 $a 0640
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a Wageningen University and Research. $3 3557914
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-05A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29877810 $z click for full text (PQDT)