東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Devolution and Policy Change in the Gulf of Mexico : = Red Snapper Management.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Devolution and Policy Change in the Gulf of Mexico :/
其他題名:	Red Snapper Management.
作者:	Moorman, Thomas Gregory.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (170 pages)
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-04.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International84-04.
標題:	Sport fishing. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29408738click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798352649701

Devolution and Policy Change in the Gulf of Mexico : = Red Snapper Management.
Moorman, Thomas Gregory.

Devolution and Policy Change in the Gulf of Mexico :Red Snapper Management. - 1 online resource (170 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-04.

Thesis (M.Sc.)--Auburn University, 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

In 2020, American states were given management authority for Lutjanus campechanus (northern red snapper) in federal waters of the Gulf of Mexico through Amendment 50 to the Gulf of Mexico Reef Fishery Management Plan. This amendment, which devolved authority to a more local scale, was preceded by years of heated debate about the methods and numbers by which red snapper should be managed. Given the politically divisive nature of both red snapper and American politics in recent years, how was Amendment 50 passed? Our research uses public policy theory, specifically its Multiple Streams Theory, to describe the process of Amendment 50's passage. We focus on the messaging strategy used by stakeholder groups. We examine their preferences and rationale for devolved management. Analysis shows that supporters associated state management with longer seasons and more flexible management practices. It also shows a general preference by stakeholders for more locally scaled management of their natural resources. Those with negative attitudes often mistrusted accountability systems in place in the states, feared overfishing, and generally preferred federal management. Beyond its ability to inform future management decisions for red snapper, this research, via the lessons learned from Amendment 50, can inform future natural resource devolution initiatives.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798352649701Subjects--Topical Terms:

3680765
Sport fishing.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Devolution and Policy Change in the Gulf of Mexico : = Red Snapper Management.
LDR:02624nmm a2200373K 4500 001 2354948
005 20230505090509.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798352649701
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29408738
035 $a (MiAaPQ)Auburn104158333
035 $a AAI29408738
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Moorman, Thomas Gregory. $3 3695330
245 1 0 $a Devolution and Policy Change in the Gulf of Mexico : $b Red Snapper Management.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (170 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-04.
500 $a Advisor: Dunning, Kelly.
502 $a Thesis (M.Sc.)--Auburn University, 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a In 2020, American states were given management authority for Lutjanus campechanus (northern red snapper) in federal waters of the Gulf of Mexico through Amendment 50 to the Gulf of Mexico Reef Fishery Management Plan. This amendment, which devolved authority to a more local scale, was preceded by years of heated debate about the methods and numbers by which red snapper should be managed. Given the politically divisive nature of both red snapper and American politics in recent years, how was Amendment 50 passed? Our research uses public policy theory, specifically its Multiple Streams Theory, to describe the process of Amendment 50's passage. We focus on the messaging strategy used by stakeholder groups. We examine their preferences and rationale for devolved management. Analysis shows that supporters associated state management with longer seasons and more flexible management practices. It also shows a general preference by stakeholders for more locally scaled management of their natural resources. Those with negative attitudes often mistrusted accountability systems in place in the states, feared overfishing, and generally preferred federal management. Beyond its ability to inform future management decisions for red snapper, this research, via the lessons learned from Amendment 50, can inform future natural resource devolution initiatives.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Sport fishing. $3 3680765
650 4 $a Politics. $3 685427
650 4 $a Coasts. $3 545629
650 4 $a Natural resource management. $3 589570
650 4 $a Regulation. $3 3561775
650 4 $a Fishing. $3 566322
650 4 $a Fisheries management. $3 3558781
650 4 $a Fish. $3 3564374
650 4 $a Aquatic sciences. $3 3174300
650 4 $a Biological oceanography. $3 2122748
650 4 $a Wildlife management. $3 571816
650 4 $a Environmental law. $3 560666
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0528
690 $a 0792
690 $a 0416
690 $a 0286
690 $a 0439
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a Auburn University. $3 1020457
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 84-04.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29408738 $z click for full text (PQDT)