東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Militarist Trap : = Linking Militarism, (Dis)Integrated Grand Strategy, and Military Efficacy.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Militarist Trap :/
其他題名:	Linking Militarism, (Dis)Integrated Grand Strategy, and Military Efficacy.
作者:	Samotin, Laura Resnick.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (136 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-08, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-08A.
標題:	Military studies. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28965396click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798780632665

The Militarist Trap : = Linking Militarism, (Dis)Integrated Grand Strategy, and Military Efficacy.
Samotin, Laura Resnick.

The Militarist Trap :Linking Militarism, (Dis)Integrated Grand Strategy, and Military Efficacy. - 1 online resource (136 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-08, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

This dissertation seeks to explain why states sometimes produce disintegrated wartime grand strategies; doing so is of both scholarly and policy importance because wartime grand strategy is a key component of military effectiveness, and therefore has a vital role to play in military victory or defeat. To do so, this dissertation explores the link between militarism, civil-military bargaining, and the formation of integrated-or disintegrated-grand strategy. I hypothesize that civilians and military leaders possess divergent preferences over the use of force that are exogenous to any one conflict, and represent enduring, rational preference divergences between civilian and military positions on the use of force. Under conditions of militarism, defined as high levels of societal admiration for the military, the civil-military bargaining space will be distorted in favor of military preferences, with the military having more power in the civil-military negotiating process due to its potentially outsized ability to shape public opinion compared to civilians. This will lead to the formation of disintegrated grand strategy-one which does not balance civilian and military preferences-which has been shown in the literature to be linked to reduced military effectiveness. I provide evidence for my hypotheses in the form of two case studies which are examined via process-tracing methodology-the United States performance in the 1991 Gulf War, and the United States performance in the 2003 invasion of Iraq. I conclude that under conditions of militarism, states produce disintegrated wartime grand strategies.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798780632665Subjects--Topical Terms:

2197382
Military studies.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Disintegrated wartime grand strategiesIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

The Militarist Trap : = Linking Militarism, (Dis)Integrated Grand Strategy, and Military Efficacy.
LDR:02881nmm a2200337K 4500 001 2353090
005 20221214062748.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798780632665
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28965396
035 $a AAI28965396
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Samotin, Laura Resnick. $3 3693423
245 1 4 $a The Militarist Trap : $b Linking Militarism, (Dis)Integrated Grand Strategy, and Military Efficacy.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (136 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-08, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Biddle, Stephen.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a This dissertation seeks to explain why states sometimes produce disintegrated wartime grand strategies; doing so is of both scholarly and policy importance because wartime grand strategy is a key component of military effectiveness, and therefore has a vital role to play in military victory or defeat. To do so, this dissertation explores the link between militarism, civil-military bargaining, and the formation of integrated-or disintegrated-grand strategy. I hypothesize that civilians and military leaders possess divergent preferences over the use of force that are exogenous to any one conflict, and represent enduring, rational preference divergences between civilian and military positions on the use of force. Under conditions of militarism, defined as high levels of societal admiration for the military, the civil-military bargaining space will be distorted in favor of military preferences, with the military having more power in the civil-military negotiating process due to its potentially outsized ability to shape public opinion compared to civilians. This will lead to the formation of disintegrated grand strategy-one which does not balance civilian and military preferences-which has been shown in the literature to be linked to reduced military effectiveness. I provide evidence for my hypotheses in the form of two case studies which are examined via process-tracing methodology-the United States performance in the 1991 Gulf War, and the United States performance in the 2003 invasion of Iraq. I conclude that under conditions of militarism, states produce disintegrated wartime grand strategies.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Military studies. $3 2197382
653 $a Disintegrated wartime grand strategies
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0601
690 $a 0750
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a Columbia University. $b Political Science. $3 1677427
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-08A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28965396 $z click for full text (PQDT)