東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Case Study on Environmental Impacts into Production Costing for Rotary-Screen Versus Digital Textile Printing.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Case Study on Environmental Impacts into Production Costing for Rotary-Screen Versus Digital Textile Printing./
作者:	Hoque, S M Azizul.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:	178 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-09, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-09B.
標題:	Manufacturing. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28972983
ISBN:	9798780649014

Case Study on Environmental Impacts into Production Costing for Rotary-Screen Versus Digital Textile Printing.
Hoque, S M Azizul.

Case Study on Environmental Impacts into Production Costing for Rotary-Screen Versus Digital Textile Printing. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 178 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-09, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--North Carolina State University, 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Textile printing, a decorative coloration process, enhances the aesthetics of textile material by placing design motifs on specific locations on the substrate (Carden, 2016; Miles, 2003; Knecht & Fothergill, 1912). While at this point in time, rotary-screen printing (RSP) is the most widely adopted printing technique (CottonWorksTM, n.d.-a), a comparatively later inclusion, digital textile printing (DTP), is gaining considerable market interest (Koseoglu et al., 2019; Kan & Yuen, 2012; Tippett, 2002). Due to the manufacturing differences between these two printing techniques, costs and environmental impacts vary substantially. This research presented a case study to compare the potential impacts of environmental factors on print production costs of RSP versus DTP. Three research objectives were set, which included establishing a comparable baseline cost model, identifying and quantifying environmental factors, and determining the individual and collective impact of those environmental factors on costs under RSP versus DTP scenarios. Methodological exploration facilitated identifying cost-contributing and environmentally impactful factors in the printing production and planning a quantification approach. Two surveys were designed to collect process information from the print production floor. The case study was conducted with CREDITEX S.A.A., a vertically integrated textile company in Lima, Peru. Creditex provided detailed data for a 16-color, 1,000 meter order printed on 100% cotton fabric with reactive dye using both RSP and DTP manufacturing processes. Analysis of the company-provided data revealed critical process information regarding RSP and DTP production. The consumption of space, chemicals, and utilities showed a direct impact on investment, material, and utility costs for RSP and DTP. The baseline cost model identified a high investment cost but low material, utility and labor cost of DTP compared to RSP. Environmental impact analysis discovered DTP as a more environmentally-friendly process with reduced consumptions and emissions. Final results recognized DTP as a cost-effective and environmentally suitable alternative to RSP. This research provides companies with a robust tool to determine environmental impacts when considering adoption of either technology and lays the foundation for future research and seeks to determine the true costs of both textile printing techniques.

ISBN: 9798780649014Subjects--Topical Terms:

3389707
Manufacturing.

Case Study on Environmental Impacts into Production Costing for Rotary-Screen Versus Digital Textile Printing.
LDR:03562nmm a2200337 4500 001 2352825
005 20221205085615.5
008 241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798780649014
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28972983
035 $a (MiAaPQ)NCState_Univ18402039212
035 $a AAI28972983
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Hoque, S M Azizul. $3 3692485
245 1 0 $a Case Study on Environmental Impacts into Production Costing for Rotary-Screen Versus Digital Textile Printing.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 178 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-09, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Moore, Marguerite;Parrillo-Chapman, Lisa.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--North Carolina State University, 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Textile printing, a decorative coloration process, enhances the aesthetics of textile material by placing design motifs on specific locations on the substrate (Carden, 2016; Miles, 2003; Knecht & Fothergill, 1912). While at this point in time, rotary-screen printing (RSP) is the most widely adopted printing technique (CottonWorksTM, n.d.-a), a comparatively later inclusion, digital textile printing (DTP), is gaining considerable market interest (Koseoglu et al., 2019; Kan & Yuen, 2012; Tippett, 2002). Due to the manufacturing differences between these two printing techniques, costs and environmental impacts vary substantially. This research presented a case study to compare the potential impacts of environmental factors on print production costs of RSP versus DTP. Three research objectives were set, which included establishing a comparable baseline cost model, identifying and quantifying environmental factors, and determining the individual and collective impact of those environmental factors on costs under RSP versus DTP scenarios. Methodological exploration facilitated identifying cost-contributing and environmentally impactful factors in the printing production and planning a quantification approach. Two surveys were designed to collect process information from the print production floor. The case study was conducted with CREDITEX S.A.A., a vertically integrated textile company in Lima, Peru. Creditex provided detailed data for a 16-color, 1,000 meter order printed on 100% cotton fabric with reactive dye using both RSP and DTP manufacturing processes. Analysis of the company-provided data revealed critical process information regarding RSP and DTP production. The consumption of space, chemicals, and utilities showed a direct impact on investment, material, and utility costs for RSP and DTP. The baseline cost model identified a high investment cost but low material, utility and labor cost of DTP compared to RSP. Environmental impact analysis discovered DTP as a more environmentally-friendly process with reduced consumptions and emissions. Final results recognized DTP as a cost-effective and environmentally suitable alternative to RSP. This research provides companies with a robust tool to determine environmental impacts when considering adoption of either technology and lays the foundation for future research and seeks to determine the true costs of both textile printing techniques.
590 $a School code: 0155.
650 4 $a Manufacturing. $3 3389707
650 4 $a Cotton. $3 865960
650 4 $a Color. $3 533870
650 4 $a Copper. $3 1070053
650 4 $a Environmental impact. $3 3564810
650 4 $a Aesthetics. $3 523036
650 4 $a Clothing. $3 3682213
650 4 $a Design. $3 518875
650 4 $a Textile printing. $3 930281
650 4 $a Screen printing. $3 3692486
650 4 $a Textile research. $3 2153103
690 $a 0650
690 $a 0389
690 $a 0474
690 $a 0994
710 2 $a North Carolina State University. $3 1018772
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-09B.
790 $a 0155
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28972983