東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Will the Daily Ingestion of High Protein Nutrition Bars (with or Without Added Fiber) for One Week Impact 24-H Energy Intake and Satiety in Healthy Young Adults?

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Will the Daily Ingestion of High Protein Nutrition Bars (with or Without Added Fiber) for One Week Impact 24-H Energy Intake and Satiety in Healthy Young Adults?/
作者:	Pang, Minghan.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2022,
面頁冊數:	92 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-11.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International83-11.
標題:	Nutrition. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29162504
ISBN:	9798802709573

Will the Daily Ingestion of High Protein Nutrition Bars (with or Without Added Fiber) for One Week Impact 24-H Energy Intake and Satiety in Healthy Young Adults?
Pang, Minghan.

Will the Daily Ingestion of High Protein Nutrition Bars (with or Without Added Fiber) for One Week Impact 24-H Energy Intake and Satiety in Healthy Young Adults? - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2022 - 92 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-11.

Thesis (M.S.)--Arizona State University, 2022.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Objective: This research examined the impact of daily ingestions of commercial high protein nutrition bars (with or without added fiber) on 24-h energy intake and satiety for one week among free-living young healthy adults. Design: In a 4-week double-blind, randomized crossover trial, 21 normal and overweight participants (Mean BMI 23.9 ± 2.7 kg/m²), free of chronic diseases, were randomized assigned to HP (high protein: 21 g protein) or HPHF (high protein high fiber: 20g, 14 g fiber) nutrition bars. Participants were included in the trial if they meet the criteria for non-smoking, and not taking prescribed medication for chronic diseases. Participants were instructed to consume commercial nutrition bars daily for seven consecutive days. Body composition was measured with a bioelectrical impedance scale at weeks 1, 3, and 5. Dietary data was recorded by the MyFitnessPal app on Wednesday, Friday, and Sunday of each week. Results: The mean energy intake for the weeks HPHF bars were consumed is significantly higher compared to baseline (1998 ± 534 vs. 1806 ± 537 respectively; p = 0.035). The mean fat mass following one week of HPHF bar consumption was significantly higher than the baseline value (18.8 ± 6.8 vs. 18.3 ± 6.7 respectively; p = 0.023) and trended higher (18.8 ± 6.8 vs. 18.3 ± 6.7 respectively; p = 0.057) in comparison to the value following one week of HP bar consumption. For the high physical activity level group (n = 10), the mean energy intakes for the baseline week and the weeks the HP and HPHF bars were consumed were 1883 ± 597 kcal, 2154 ± 712 kcal, and 2099 ± 603 kcal respectively (p ˂ 0.04; energy intakes for both bars were significantly different from baseline). Nutrient intakes differed significantly mirroring the nutrient profile for each specific bar. There are significant effects after both bars on satiety, but there were no differences between each bar.Conclusions: Sales of nutrition bars gained rapid growth and may represent a unique source for specific nutrients. However, ingestion of commercial high protein nutrition bars may increase the risk of gaining fat mass and eventual body mass over time.

ISBN: 9798802709573Subjects--Topical Terms:

517777
Nutrition.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Energy Intake

Will the Daily Ingestion of High Protein Nutrition Bars (with or Without Added Fiber) for One Week Impact 24-H Energy Intake and Satiety in Healthy Young Adults?
LDR:03380nmm a2200385 4500 001 2350910
005 20221028161048.5
008 241004s2022 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798802709573
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29162504
035 $a AAI29162504
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Pang, Minghan. $3 3690441
245 1 0 $a Will the Daily Ingestion of High Protein Nutrition Bars (with or Without Added Fiber) for One Week Impact 24-H Energy Intake and Satiety in Healthy Young Adults?
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2022
300 $a 92 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-11.
500 $a Advisor: Johnston, Carol.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--Arizona State University, 2022.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Objective: This research examined the impact of daily ingestions of commercial high protein nutrition bars (with or without added fiber) on 24-h energy intake and satiety for one week among free-living young healthy adults. Design: In a 4-week double-blind, randomized crossover trial, 21 normal and overweight participants (Mean BMI 23.9 ± 2.7 kg/m²), free of chronic diseases, were randomized assigned to HP (high protein: 21 g protein) or HPHF (high protein high fiber: 20g, 14 g fiber) nutrition bars. Participants were included in the trial if they meet the criteria for non-smoking, and not taking prescribed medication for chronic diseases. Participants were instructed to consume commercial nutrition bars daily for seven consecutive days. Body composition was measured with a bioelectrical impedance scale at weeks 1, 3, and 5. Dietary data was recorded by the MyFitnessPal app on Wednesday, Friday, and Sunday of each week. Results: The mean energy intake for the weeks HPHF bars were consumed is significantly higher compared to baseline (1998 ± 534 vs. 1806 ± 537 respectively; p = 0.035). The mean fat mass following one week of HPHF bar consumption was significantly higher than the baseline value (18.8 ± 6.8 vs. 18.3 ± 6.7 respectively; p = 0.023) and trended higher (18.8 ± 6.8 vs. 18.3 ± 6.7 respectively; p = 0.057) in comparison to the value following one week of HP bar consumption. For the high physical activity level group (n = 10), the mean energy intakes for the baseline week and the weeks the HP and HPHF bars were consumed were 1883 ± 597 kcal, 2154 ± 712 kcal, and 2099 ± 603 kcal respectively (p ˂ 0.04; energy intakes for both bars were significantly different from baseline). Nutrient intakes differed significantly mirroring the nutrient profile for each specific bar. There are significant effects after both bars on satiety, but there were no differences between each bar.Conclusions: Sales of nutrition bars gained rapid growth and may represent a unique source for specific nutrients. However, ingestion of commercial high protein nutrition bars may increase the risk of gaining fat mass and eventual body mass over time.
590 $a School code: 0010.
650 4 $a Nutrition. $3 517777
650 4 $a Food science. $3 3173303
650 4 $a Health care management. $3 2122906
653 $a Energy Intake
653 $a Fiber
653 $a Nutrition Bar
653 $a Obesity
653 $a Protein
653 $a Snack
690 $a 0570
690 $a 0359
690 $a 0769
710 2 $a Arizona State University. $b Nutrition. $3 1685258
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 83-11.
790 $a 0010
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2022
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29162504