東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Contradictions of Cultural Reform: Progressive Colonial Anthropology in the US and Mexico, 1930-1975.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Contradictions of Cultural Reform: Progressive Colonial Anthropology in the US and Mexico, 1930-1975./
作者:	Gee, John.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:	392 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-06, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-06A.
標題:	History. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28768372
ISBN:	9798496525657

The Contradictions of Cultural Reform: Progressive Colonial Anthropology in the US and Mexico, 1930-1975.
Gee, John.

The Contradictions of Cultural Reform: Progressive Colonial Anthropology in the US and Mexico, 1930-1975. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 392 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-06, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Harvard University, 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

This dissertation tells the history of progressive colonial anthropology, an ultimately-failed effort to establish cultural anthropologists as authoritative indigenous affairs policy experts in the Americas. Tracing this project in the US and Mexico from the 1930s to the 1980s, it explains how a group of anthropologists achieved the influence they sought and then lost it.The anthropologists' temporary success illustrates the powerful role that the concept of culture played in reconciling liberal nation-states to ethnic plurality in the twentieth century. Culture allowed state-builders and experts to conceive of an assimilation process that would be partial, but stable. In theory, targeted groups would adopt new political and economic institutions while maintaining core cultural values. The anthropologists' failure, meanwhile, reveals the limits of expert authority. Anthropologists hoped to oversee such processes of cultural adaptation, but indigenous peoples asserted claims to cultural self-determination that entailed their own authority over cultural knowledge. By the late 20th century, these claims obligated anthropologists to take an auxiliary role.Over the course of this history, the concept of culture increasingly took on the aesthetic qualities of "heritage" and the philosophical qualities of "world view." These features make culture more distinct from other areas of life, and therefore easier both to contest and to essentialize. Consequently, cultural pluralism remains as live a debate in the present as it was a century ago.

ISBN: 9798496525657Subjects--Topical Terms:

516518
History.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Chiapas

The Contradictions of Cultural Reform: Progressive Colonial Anthropology in the US and Mexico, 1930-1975.
LDR:02750nmm a2200385 4500 001 2349996
005 20221017170620.5
008 241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798496525657
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28768372
035 $a AAI28768372
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Gee, John. $0 (orcid)0000-0002-6409-6406 $3 3689430
245 1 4 $a The Contradictions of Cultural Reform: Progressive Colonial Anthropology in the US and Mexico, 1930-1975.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 392 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-06, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Kloppenberg, James.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Harvard University, 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a This dissertation tells the history of progressive colonial anthropology, an ultimately-failed effort to establish cultural anthropologists as authoritative indigenous affairs policy experts in the Americas. Tracing this project in the US and Mexico from the 1930s to the 1980s, it explains how a group of anthropologists achieved the influence they sought and then lost it.The anthropologists' temporary success illustrates the powerful role that the concept of culture played in reconciling liberal nation-states to ethnic plurality in the twentieth century. Culture allowed state-builders and experts to conceive of an assimilation process that would be partial, but stable. In theory, targeted groups would adopt new political and economic institutions while maintaining core cultural values. The anthropologists' failure, meanwhile, reveals the limits of expert authority. Anthropologists hoped to oversee such processes of cultural adaptation, but indigenous peoples asserted claims to cultural self-determination that entailed their own authority over cultural knowledge. By the late 20th century, these claims obligated anthropologists to take an auxiliary role.Over the course of this history, the concept of culture increasingly took on the aesthetic qualities of "heritage" and the philosophical qualities of "world view." These features make culture more distinct from other areas of life, and therefore easier both to contest and to essentialize. Consequently, cultural pluralism remains as live a debate in the present as it was a century ago.
590 $a School code: 0084.
650 4 $a History. $3 516518
650 4 $a American history. $3 2122692
650 4 $a Latin American history. $3 2122902
653 $a Chiapas
653 $a History of anthropology
653 $a Indigenous
653 $a Mexico
653 $a Navajo
653 $a United States
690 $a 0578
690 $a 0337
690 $a 0336
710 2 $a Harvard University. $b History. $3 1043925
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-06A.
790 $a 0084
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28768372