東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Learning to Discover Structure in Animal and Human Decision Tasks.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Learning to Discover Structure in Animal and Human Decision Tasks./
作者:	Song, Mingyu.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2022,
面頁冊數:	142 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-08, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-08B.
標題:	Neurosciences. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28870195
ISBN:	9798780633624

Learning to Discover Structure in Animal and Human Decision Tasks.
Song, Mingyu.

Learning to Discover Structure in Animal and Human Decision Tasks. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2022 - 142 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-08, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Princeton University, 2022.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Learning in real life is never as simple as forming stimulus-response mappings. It involves identifying the current context (i.e., relevant information for task at hand), figuring out the transition between contexts, and learning about complex relationships and rules. In this dissertation, I study how animals and humans learn to discover such structures in decision tasks. I begin by demonstrating the importance of studying structure or representation learning. In Chapter 2, I show that rats do not form the optimal task representation in an odor-guided decision task, even after extensive training. This suggests that we cannot assume a task representation without testing it. It also raises the following questions: How is a task representation learned? What factors may affect such learning? In the rest of this dissertation, I use two tasks to study these questions with animals and humans. In Chapter 3, I propose a latent- cause inference model to explain fear extinction in rats. This model characterizes how animals make inference about the underlying causes that generate observations (e.g., shocks) and how the causes may change over time. It explains why gradually reducing shock frequency is more effective in extinguishing fear than the standard extinction procedure, by demonstrating how different procedures lead to the learning of distinct underlying task structures. In Chapter 4, I study how humans actively learn about multi-dimensional rules with probabilistic feedback. I show that people use both value-based and rule-based learning systems, and trade off them based on the instructed task complexity. This study sheds light on how humans make strategic use of cognitive resource when learning complex task structures. In Chapter 5, I propose a novel approach to study representation learning with recurrent neural networks (RNNs). I demonstrate that RNNs can be useful for developing better cognitive models and identifying cognitive differences across individuals. In the Conclusion, I summarize the findings from the above studies, and discuss common principles that underlie animal and human representation learning.

ISBN: 9798780633624Subjects--Topical Terms:

588700
Neurosciences.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Task representation

Learning to Discover Structure in Animal and Human Decision Tasks.
LDR:03275nmm a2200361 4500 001 2349902
005 20221010063652.5
008 241004s2022 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798780633624
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28870195
035 $a AAI28870195
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Song, Mingyu. $3 3689328
245 1 0 $a Learning to Discover Structure in Animal and Human Decision Tasks.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2022
300 $a 142 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-08, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Niv, Yael.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Princeton University, 2022.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Learning in real life is never as simple as forming stimulus-response mappings. It involves identifying the current context (i.e., relevant information for task at hand), figuring out the transition between contexts, and learning about complex relationships and rules. In this dissertation, I study how animals and humans learn to discover such structures in decision tasks. I begin by demonstrating the importance of studying structure or representation learning. In Chapter 2, I show that rats do not form the optimal task representation in an odor-guided decision task, even after extensive training. This suggests that we cannot assume a task representation without testing it. It also raises the following questions: How is a task representation learned? What factors may affect such learning? In the rest of this dissertation, I use two tasks to study these questions with animals and humans. In Chapter 3, I propose a latent- cause inference model to explain fear extinction in rats. This model characterizes how animals make inference about the underlying causes that generate observations (e.g., shocks) and how the causes may change over time. It explains why gradually reducing shock frequency is more effective in extinguishing fear than the standard extinction procedure, by demonstrating how different procedures lead to the learning of distinct underlying task structures. In Chapter 4, I study how humans actively learn about multi-dimensional rules with probabilistic feedback. I show that people use both value-based and rule-based learning systems, and trade off them based on the instructed task complexity. This study sheds light on how humans make strategic use of cognitive resource when learning complex task structures. In Chapter 5, I propose a novel approach to study representation learning with recurrent neural networks (RNNs). I demonstrate that RNNs can be useful for developing better cognitive models and identifying cognitive differences across individuals. In the Conclusion, I summarize the findings from the above studies, and discuss common principles that underlie animal and human representation learning.
590 $a School code: 0181.
650 4 $a Neurosciences. $3 588700
650 4 $a Psychobiology. $3 555678
650 4 $a Physiological psychology. $3 2144820
653 $a Task representation
653 $a Decision tasks
653 $a Shock frequency
653 $a Identifying cognitive differences
690 $a 0317
690 $a 0349
690 $a 0989
710 2 $a Princeton University. $b Neuroscience. $3 2099004
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-08B.
790 $a 0181
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2022
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28870195