東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Modality and the semantics-pragmatics interface.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Modality and the semantics-pragmatics interface./
作者:	Papafragou, Anna.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 1998,
面頁冊數:	336 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 78-11, Section: C.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International78-11C.
標題:	Linguistics. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10042800
ISBN:	9781339551081

Modality and the semantics-pragmatics interface.
Papafragou, Anna.

Modality and the semantics-pragmatics interface. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 1998 - 336 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 78-11, Section: C.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of London, University College London (United Kingdom), 1998.

This thesis explores certain aspects of the structure of lexical semantics and its interaction with pragmatic processes of utterance comprehension, using as a case-study a sample of the English modal verbs. Contrary to previous polysemy-based accounts, I propose and defend a unitary semantic account of the English modals, and I give a relevance-theoretic explanation of the construction of their admissible (mainly, root and epistemic) contextual interpretations. Departing from previous accounts of modality, I propose a link between epistemic modality and metarepresentation, and treat the emergence of epistemic modal markers as a result of the development of the human theory of mind. In support of my central contention that the English modals are semantically univocal, I reanalyse a range of arguments employed by previous polysemy-based approaches. These arguments involve the distributional properties of the modals, their relationship to truth-conditional content, the status of so-called speech-act modality, and the historical development of epistemic meanings: it turns out that none of these domains can offer reasons to abandon the univocal semantic analysis of the English modals. Furthermore, I argue that the priority of root over epistemic meanings in language acquisition is predicted by the link between epistemic modality and metarepresentation. Finally, data from a cognitive disorder (autism) are considered in the light of the metarepresentation hypothesis about epistemic modality. The discussion of modality has a number of implications for the concept of polysemy. I suggest that, despite its widespread use in current lexical semantics, polysemy is not a natural class, and use the example of the Cognitive Linguistics to illustrate that polysemy presupposes some questionable assumptions about the structure of lexical concepts. I propose a division of labour between ambiguity, semantic underdeterminacy, and a narrowed version of polysemy, and present its ramifications for the psychology of word meaning. In the final chapter, I extend the proposed framework for modality to the analysis of generic sentences, thereby capturing certain similarities between genericity and modality.

ISBN: 9781339551081Subjects--Topical Terms:

524476
Linguistics.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Polysemy

Modality and the semantics-pragmatics interface.
LDR:03209nmm a2200301 4500 001 2348481
005 20220912135552.5
008 241004s1998 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339551081
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10042800
035 $a (MiAaPQ)RLUKUniversityCollegeLondonU2911
035 $a AAI10042800
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Papafragou, Anna. $3 878332
245 1 0 $a Modality and the semantics-pragmatics interface.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 1998
300 $a 336 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 78-11, Section: C.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of London, University College London (United Kingdom), 1998.
520 $a This thesis explores certain aspects of the structure of lexical semantics and its interaction with pragmatic processes of utterance comprehension, using as a case-study a sample of the English modal verbs. Contrary to previous polysemy-based accounts, I propose and defend a unitary semantic account of the English modals, and I give a relevance-theoretic explanation of the construction of their admissible (mainly, root and epistemic) contextual interpretations. Departing from previous accounts of modality, I propose a link between epistemic modality and metarepresentation, and treat the emergence of epistemic modal markers as a result of the development of the human theory of mind. In support of my central contention that the English modals are semantically univocal, I reanalyse a range of arguments employed by previous polysemy-based approaches. These arguments involve the distributional properties of the modals, their relationship to truth-conditional content, the status of so-called speech-act modality, and the historical development of epistemic meanings: it turns out that none of these domains can offer reasons to abandon the univocal semantic analysis of the English modals. Furthermore, I argue that the priority of root over epistemic meanings in language acquisition is predicted by the link between epistemic modality and metarepresentation. Finally, data from a cognitive disorder (autism) are considered in the light of the metarepresentation hypothesis about epistemic modality. The discussion of modality has a number of implications for the concept of polysemy. I suggest that, despite its widespread use in current lexical semantics, polysemy is not a natural class, and use the example of the Cognitive Linguistics to illustrate that polysemy presupposes some questionable assumptions about the structure of lexical concepts. I propose a division of labour between ambiguity, semantic underdeterminacy, and a narrowed version of polysemy, and present its ramifications for the psychology of word meaning. In the final chapter, I extend the proposed framework for modality to the analysis of generic sentences, thereby capturing certain similarities between genericity and modality.
590 $a School code: 6022.
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 524476
653 $a Polysemy
690 $a 0290
710 2 $a University of London, University College London (United Kingdom). $b Department not provided. $3 3173644
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 78-11C.
790 $a 6022
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1998
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10042800