東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Bank Liquidity Creation and Systemic Risk.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Bank Liquidity Creation and Systemic Risk./
作者:	Kirimhan, Destan.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:	177 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-03A.
標題:	Finance. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28412829
ISBN:	9798538155507

Bank Liquidity Creation and Systemic Risk.
Kirimhan, Destan.

Bank Liquidity Creation and Systemic Risk. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 177 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of South Carolina, 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

My dissertation includes three essays on bank liquidity creation and systemic risk. In the first essay, we examine the role of distracted institutional investors in banks in one of the most comprehensive measures of bank output, bank liquidity creation. We employ institutional investor distraction measure developed by Kempf et al. (2017). With a sample of publicly listed U.S. banks over the period of 1986-2016, we find that as institutional investors become more distracted, banks create more liquidity on the asset-side and off-balance sheet side. These results are stronger for large banks relative to small banks and are more pronounced during crises and high uncertainty times. The results suggest a previously undiscovered outcome of institutional investor distraction with serious potential consequences for the financial system and real economy.In the second essay, we investigate the effects of banking powers on bank liquidity creation and documents supportive evidence on the certification role of universal banking powers offsetting the conflict of interest view. We find that banking powers increase bank liquidity creation in the same country. The results are robust to subsample tests and additional controls. To better mitigate the endogeneity concerns and build a casual effect, we examine the effect of banking powers in home country on liquidity created by banks' foreign subsidiaries. We find that lower banking powers in home country increase bank liquidity creation of foreign subsidiaries. These results are also supportive for international regulatory arbitrage in the financial services industry. In the third essay, we examine the effects of financial regulatory uncertainty on the systemic risk contributions of banks in the U.S. We find that financial regulation uncertainty leads to significantly higher systemic risk contributions of banks. Supportive mechanisms behind this finding are exacerbating bank loan portfolios and increased stock market volatility. Results are robust to endogeneity concerns. Therefore, regulators and policymakers should take the precision and proactiveness of their regulatory actions into account.

ISBN: 9798538155507Subjects--Topical Terms:

542899
Finance.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Bank liquidity creation

Bank Liquidity Creation and Systemic Risk.
LDR:03227nmm a2200337 4500 001 2347882
005 20220829094942.5
008 241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798538155507
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28412829
035 $a AAI28412829
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Kirimhan, Destan. $3 3687189
245 1 0 $a Bank Liquidity Creation and Systemic Risk.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 177 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Berger, Allen N.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of South Carolina, 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a My dissertation includes three essays on bank liquidity creation and systemic risk. In the first essay, we examine the role of distracted institutional investors in banks in one of the most comprehensive measures of bank output, bank liquidity creation. We employ institutional investor distraction measure developed by Kempf et al. (2017). With a sample of publicly listed U.S. banks over the period of 1986-2016, we find that as institutional investors become more distracted, banks create more liquidity on the asset-side and off-balance sheet side. These results are stronger for large banks relative to small banks and are more pronounced during crises and high uncertainty times. The results suggest a previously undiscovered outcome of institutional investor distraction with serious potential consequences for the financial system and real economy.In the second essay, we investigate the effects of banking powers on bank liquidity creation and documents supportive evidence on the certification role of universal banking powers offsetting the conflict of interest view. We find that banking powers increase bank liquidity creation in the same country. The results are robust to subsample tests and additional controls. To better mitigate the endogeneity concerns and build a casual effect, we examine the effect of banking powers in home country on liquidity created by banks' foreign subsidiaries. We find that lower banking powers in home country increase bank liquidity creation of foreign subsidiaries. These results are also supportive for international regulatory arbitrage in the financial services industry. In the third essay, we examine the effects of financial regulatory uncertainty on the systemic risk contributions of banks in the U.S. We find that financial regulation uncertainty leads to significantly higher systemic risk contributions of banks. Supportive mechanisms behind this finding are exacerbating bank loan portfolios and increased stock market volatility. Results are robust to endogeneity concerns. Therefore, regulators and policymakers should take the precision and proactiveness of their regulatory actions into account.
590 $a School code: 0202.
650 4 $a Finance. $3 542899
650 4 $a Liability. $3 3562832
650 4 $a Hypotheses. $3 3560118
650 4 $a Variables. $3 3548259
653 $a Bank liquidity creation
653 $a Institutional investors
653 $a Systemic risk
653 $a Uncertainty
690 $a 0508
710 2 $a University of South Carolina. $b Business Administration. $3 1057417
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-03A.
790 $a 0202
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28412829