東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Operationalizing Accreditation Standards for Self-Directed Learning: Exploring the Impact of Contextual Factors and Capacity on Undergraduate Medical Education.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Operationalizing Accreditation Standards for Self-Directed Learning: Exploring the Impact of Contextual Factors and Capacity on Undergraduate Medical Education./
Author:	Chiplock, Amanda M.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
Description:	425 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-07, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-07A.
Subject:	Health education. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28860990
ISBN:	9798762177139

Operationalizing Accreditation Standards for Self-Directed Learning: Exploring the Impact of Contextual Factors and Capacity on Undergraduate Medical Education.
Chiplock, Amanda M.

Operationalizing Accreditation Standards for Self-Directed Learning: Exploring the Impact of Contextual Factors and Capacity on Undergraduate Medical Education. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 425 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-07, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Florida Atlantic University, 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The purposes of this sequential, mixed-methods, multiple-case study were to understand how fully-accredited medical schools in the United States operationalize the accreditation standard for self-directed learning (SDL), and to recommend an innovative framework for guiding SDL implementation across the continuum of medical education programs. The main investigation relied on a survey in Phase 1 to collect quantitative and qualitative data, followed by a multiple-case study in Phase 2 to collect qualitative data to gain deeper insights into the overall organizational context and capacity for SDL implementation at the local level. Two cases for Phase 2 were identified through analysis of the quantitative data collected with the survey instrument in Phase 1. A low survey response rate of 10% in Phase 1, and an unexpected high number of declined invitations to participate in Phase 2 (n = 6), were the most significant limitations to this study.However, considering the totality of the findings for this study, there are salient commonalities among the schools for implementing SDL across the continuum of medical education, which may be helpful for many programs struggling to meet LCME expectations for SDL. Commonalities included (a) definitions of SDL aligned or closely with the LCME's definition; (b) explicit statements of where, when, and how SDL skills are implemented and experienced throughout the curriculum; (c) specific activities implemented to facilitate SDL objectives using clinically-relevant, active learning pedagogy with vertical and horizontal integration; and (d) evaluating implementation and identifying barriers that may impede SDL experiences for all stakeholders.The findings highlight the need for medical schools to increase capacity for SDL implementation at all levels of the organization including optimizing experiential learning opportunities, scaffolding and spiraling SDL throughout the curriculum, and investing time and resources for continuous SDL faculty development. Planning for SDL implementation across the continuum of medical education will be different for each year or phase of a program, and unique for each medical school. It is recommended SDL implementation be explicit and strategic, integrating SDL skills acquisition, development, and refinement throughout the medical education program.

ISBN: 9798762177139Subjects--Topical Terms:

559086
Health education.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Accreditation

Operationalizing Accreditation Standards for Self-Directed Learning: Exploring the Impact of Contextual Factors and Capacity on Undergraduate Medical Education.
LDR:03657nmm a2200385 4500 001 2347550
005 20220801062235.5
008 241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798762177139
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28860990
035 $a AAI28860990
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Chiplock, Amanda M. $0 (orcid)0000-0002-0548-1515 $3 3686818
245 1 0 $a Operationalizing Accreditation Standards for Self-Directed Learning: Exploring the Impact of Contextual Factors and Capacity on Undergraduate Medical Education.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 425 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-07, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Vaughan, Michelle.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Florida Atlantic University, 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The purposes of this sequential, mixed-methods, multiple-case study were to understand how fully-accredited medical schools in the United States operationalize the accreditation standard for self-directed learning (SDL), and to recommend an innovative framework for guiding SDL implementation across the continuum of medical education programs. The main investigation relied on a survey in Phase 1 to collect quantitative and qualitative data, followed by a multiple-case study in Phase 2 to collect qualitative data to gain deeper insights into the overall organizational context and capacity for SDL implementation at the local level. Two cases for Phase 2 were identified through analysis of the quantitative data collected with the survey instrument in Phase 1. A low survey response rate of 10% in Phase 1, and an unexpected high number of declined invitations to participate in Phase 2 (n = 6), were the most significant limitations to this study.However, considering the totality of the findings for this study, there are salient commonalities among the schools for implementing SDL across the continuum of medical education, which may be helpful for many programs struggling to meet LCME expectations for SDL. Commonalities included (a) definitions of SDL aligned or closely with the LCME's definition; (b) explicit statements of where, when, and how SDL skills are implemented and experienced throughout the curriculum; (c) specific activities implemented to facilitate SDL objectives using clinically-relevant, active learning pedagogy with vertical and horizontal integration; and (d) evaluating implementation and identifying barriers that may impede SDL experiences for all stakeholders.The findings highlight the need for medical schools to increase capacity for SDL implementation at all levels of the organization including optimizing experiential learning opportunities, scaffolding and spiraling SDL throughout the curriculum, and investing time and resources for continuous SDL faculty development. Planning for SDL implementation across the continuum of medical education will be different for each year or phase of a program, and unique for each medical school. It is recommended SDL implementation be explicit and strategic, integrating SDL skills acquisition, development, and refinement throughout the medical education program.
590 $a School code: 0119.
650 4 $a Health education. $3 559086
650 4 $a Adult education. $3 543202
650 4 $a Curriculum development. $3 684418
653 $a Accreditation
653 $a Medical education
653 $a Medical education curriculum
653 $a SDL
653 $a Self-directed learning
653 $a Undergraduate medical education
690 $a 0680
690 $a 0516
690 $a 0727
710 2 $a Florida Atlantic University. $b Curriculum and Instruction. $3 2098540
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-07A.
790 $a 0119
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28860990