東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Evolution and Knowledge.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Evolution and Knowledge./
作者:	Kallberg, Luke J.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:	318 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-03B.
標題:	Epistemology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28716897
ISBN:	9798535585055

Evolution and Knowledge.
Kallberg, Luke J.

Evolution and Knowledge. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 318 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Saint Louis University, 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Evolutionary Debunking Arguments (EDAs) are arguments that use considerations from evolutionary science to raise doubts about some broad class of beliefs, such as moral beliefs, religious beliefs, object beliefs, or all beliefs. A given EDA will attack some particular positive epistemic status (such as justification, warrant, rational belief, true belief, knowledge, etc.) for some class of beliefs for some class of people. I attempt to synthesize and taxonomize various EDAs in various domains, and to defend the most powerful versions against common objections. I argue that powerful EDAs can be formulated that appeals to higher-order evidence against the epistemic safety of all human beliefs. I argue that these EDAs can be resisted only by appeal to one of a handful of controversial theses. Accordingly, I argue that EDAs should drive positive philosophy: they should push us to adopt philosophical positions that we otherwise might not.

ISBN: 9798535585055Subjects--Topical Terms:

896969
Epistemology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Epistemic safety

Evolution and Knowledge.
LDR:02067nmm a2200373 4500 001 2346899
005 20220706051318.5
008 241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798535585055
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28716897
035 $a AAI28716897
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Kallberg, Luke J. $3 3686098
245 1 0 $a Evolution and Knowledge.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 318 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Greco, John.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Saint Louis University, 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Evolutionary Debunking Arguments (EDAs) are arguments that use considerations from evolutionary science to raise doubts about some broad class of beliefs, such as moral beliefs, religious beliefs, object beliefs, or all beliefs. A given EDA will attack some particular positive epistemic status (such as justification, warrant, rational belief, true belief, knowledge, etc.) for some class of beliefs for some class of people. I attempt to synthesize and taxonomize various EDAs in various domains, and to defend the most powerful versions against common objections. I argue that powerful EDAs can be formulated that appeals to higher-order evidence against the epistemic safety of all human beliefs. I argue that these EDAs can be resisted only by appeal to one of a handful of controversial theses. Accordingly, I argue that EDAs should drive positive philosophy: they should push us to adopt philosophical positions that we otherwise might not.
590 $a School code: 0193.
650 4 $a Epistemology. $3 896969
650 4 $a Evolution & development. $3 3172418
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 519075
653 $a Epistemic safety
653 $a Evolutionary debunking
653 $a Higher-order evidence
653 $a Self-defeating arguments
653 $a Skepticism
690 $a 0393
690 $a 0412
690 $a 0621
710 2 $a Saint Louis University. $b Philosophy. $3 3171713
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-03B.
790 $a 0193
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28716897