東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Alternative Receptive Language Assessment Modalities and Stimuli for Children with ASD Who Are Minimally Verbal.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Alternative Receptive Language Assessment Modalities and Stimuli for Children with ASD Who Are Minimally Verbal./
作者:	Muller, Kristen.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
面頁冊數:	77 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-05, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International81-05B.
標題:	Speech therapy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13899198
ISBN:	9781088367247

Alternative Receptive Language Assessment Modalities and Stimuli for Children with ASD Who Are Minimally Verbal.
Muller, Kristen.

Alternative Receptive Language Assessment Modalities and Stimuli for Children with ASD Who Are Minimally Verbal. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 77 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-05, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Kansas, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

There are very few receptive language measures that are appropriate for children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) who have minimal verbal skills. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate and compare alternative modalities and stimuli used to measure receptive language skills in children with ASD who are minimally verbal. This study systematically compared participants' outcomes on three different receptive language assessment conditions: a picture-based standardized assessment, a touchscreen assessment, and an assessment that used real-object stimuli. A secondary aim of this study was to examine how individual characteristics such as cognition, maladaptive behavior, autism symptomology, and gesture use impact performance on assessment conditions. A tertiary aim involved the use of an intermodal preferential looking paradigm (IPLP) to determine whether eye gaze data may provide additional, implicit information about word comprehension for children with ASD. Twenty-seven students between the ages of 3 and 12 who had minimal verbal skills and a diagnosis of ASD participated in this study. Results from a crossed-random effects model showed that participants' scores in the real-object assessment condition were significantly higher than in the standardized condition, and marginally higher than scores in the touchscreen assessment. Together, cognition and fine motor skills accounted for 44% of the variance in participants' scores. IPLP data revealed that participants spent more time looking at target stimuli rather than foil stimuli in 36% of no-response trials. Clinical implications of these findings are discussed.

ISBN: 9781088367247Subjects--Topical Terms:

520446
Speech therapy.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Autism spectrum disorders

Alternative Receptive Language Assessment Modalities and Stimuli for Children with ASD Who Are Minimally Verbal.
LDR:02852nmm a2200349 4500 001 2345238
005 20230119153158.5
008 241004s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781088367247
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI13899198
035 $a AAI13899198
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Muller, Kristen. $3 3172427
245 1 0 $a Alternative Receptive Language Assessment Modalities and Stimuli for Children with ASD Who Are Minimally Verbal.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 77 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-05, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Brady, Nancy C.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Kansas, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
506 $a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
520 $a There are very few receptive language measures that are appropriate for children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) who have minimal verbal skills. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate and compare alternative modalities and stimuli used to measure receptive language skills in children with ASD who are minimally verbal. This study systematically compared participants' outcomes on three different receptive language assessment conditions: a picture-based standardized assessment, a touchscreen assessment, and an assessment that used real-object stimuli. A secondary aim of this study was to examine how individual characteristics such as cognition, maladaptive behavior, autism symptomology, and gesture use impact performance on assessment conditions. A tertiary aim involved the use of an intermodal preferential looking paradigm (IPLP) to determine whether eye gaze data may provide additional, implicit information about word comprehension for children with ASD. Twenty-seven students between the ages of 3 and 12 who had minimal verbal skills and a diagnosis of ASD participated in this study. Results from a crossed-random effects model showed that participants' scores in the real-object assessment condition were significantly higher than in the standardized condition, and marginally higher than scores in the touchscreen assessment. Together, cognition and fine motor skills accounted for 44% of the variance in participants' scores. IPLP data revealed that participants spent more time looking at target stimuli rather than foil stimuli in 36% of no-response trials. Clinical implications of these findings are discussed.
590 $a School code: 0099.
650 4 $a Speech therapy. $3 520446
653 $a Autism spectrum disorders
653 $a Children
653 $a Minimal verbal skills
653 $a Receptive language
690 $a 0460
710 2 $a University of Kansas. $b Hearing and Speech. $3 2098877
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 81-05B.
790 $a 0099
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13899198