東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Romantic Symbolism Re-examined: The Ontic Fallacy.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Romantic Symbolism Re-examined: The Ontic Fallacy./
Author:	Worth, Ryan Mitchell.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
Description:	82 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-05.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International83-05.
Subject:	Artists. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28745081
ISBN:	9798494444660

Romantic Symbolism Re-examined: The Ontic Fallacy.
Worth, Ryan Mitchell.

Romantic Symbolism Re-examined: The Ontic Fallacy. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 82 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-05.

Thesis (M.A.)--Brigham Young University, 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Romantic symbolism is a poorly understood concept. It was first formulated by the Romantics in a variety of contexts. Goethe develops his theory of the symbol most notably in his scientific works. Schelling's approach to the Romantic symbol is firmly rooted in his philosophical writings. Coleridge articulates a Romantic notion of symbolism across his extensive literary criticism. The foundational influence of these related theories of Romantic symbolism can be seen in the artistic, literary, and scientific productions of Romantic minded individuals all over Europe in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century. However, the nature and scope of the Romantic symbol as originally formulated by Goethe, Schelling, and others has been obfuscated in unfortunate ways by the contemporary theoretical assumptions and narrow interpretations of recent academic scholarship. This thesis restores the original connotation of the Romantic symbol by identifying the common way in which it is misconstrued: the ontic fallacy.

ISBN: 9798494444660Subjects--Topical Terms:

524768
Artists.

Romantic Symbolism Re-examined: The Ontic Fallacy.
LDR:02075nmm a2200361 4500 001 2345187
005 20220531132459.5
008 241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798494444660
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28745081
035 $a (MiAaPQ)BrighamYoung10145
035 $a AAI28745081
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Worth, Ryan Mitchell. $3 3684086
245 1 0 $a Romantic Symbolism Re-examined: The Ontic Fallacy.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 82 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-05.
500 $a Advisor: Peer, Larry H. .
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Brigham Young University, 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Romantic symbolism is a poorly understood concept. It was first formulated by the Romantics in a variety of contexts. Goethe develops his theory of the symbol most notably in his scientific works. Schelling's approach to the Romantic symbol is firmly rooted in his philosophical writings. Coleridge articulates a Romantic notion of symbolism across his extensive literary criticism. The foundational influence of these related theories of Romantic symbolism can be seen in the artistic, literary, and scientific productions of Romantic minded individuals all over Europe in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century. However, the nature and scope of the Romantic symbol as originally formulated by Goethe, Schelling, and others has been obfuscated in unfortunate ways by the contemporary theoretical assumptions and narrow interpretations of recent academic scholarship. This thesis restores the original connotation of the Romantic symbol by identifying the common way in which it is misconstrued: the ontic fallacy.
590 $a School code: 0022.
650 4 $a Artists. $3 524768
650 4 $a Roman civilization. $3 3684087
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Aesthetics. $3 523036
650 4 $a Cognition & reasoning. $3 3556293
650 4 $a Ancient history. $3 2144815
650 4 $a Cognitive psychology. $3 523881
650 4 $a History. $3 516518
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 519075
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0650
690 $a 0579
690 $a 0633
690 $a 0578
690 $a 0621
710 2 $a Brigham Young University. $3 1017451
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 83-05.
790 $a 0022
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28745081