語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Essays on Finance and Law.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Essays on Finance and Law./
作者:
Dong, Mengming Michael.
出版者:
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:
171 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-04, Section: B.
Contained By:
Dissertations Abstracts International83-04B.
標題:
Law. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28736144
ISBN:
9798535525457
Essays on Finance and Law.
Dong, Mengming Michael.
Essays on Finance and Law.
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 171 p.
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-04, Section: B.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Rice University, 2020.
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
This dissertation contains three chapters that study topics in financial economics and how finance affects legal outcomes. In the first chapter, I study how access to consumer litigation funding (CLF) impacts outcomes in the legal system. CLF provides cash advances to consumer plaintiffs in pursuing a tort complaint. Using exogenous variations in access to CLF resulting from staggered state law changes in the U.S., I find evidence that restricting CLF causes a decline in the number of tort lawsuits filed with courts by 18.7 percent. Such finding contrasts the theoretical predictions in the literature that CLF induces settlement, and could be due to the fact that, in reality, defendants hardly ever know whether the plaintiff is funded by CLF. I also find that restricting CLF increases the proportion of liability rulings at trial that favor the plaintiffs by 5.9 percentage points but does not change the portion of lawsuits that go to trial. Overall, these findings suggest that access to CLF either incentivizes plaintiffs to file lawsuits that are less likely to be successful in the court or induces moral hazards of plaintiffs during the trial process.In the second chapter, I examine the conflicting evidence in the finance literature on whether the equity markets underreact or overreact to liquidity shocks. Using comprehensive stock-level news data, I find that the market underreacts to liquidity shocks whether there is contemporaneous public news or not. Furthermore, when there is public news released contemporaneously, the price discovery process of liquidity shocks does not get any faster. In certain tests, the drift is actually significantly larger. This shows that even though public news reveals more information to investors and draws more investor attention, it does not help them incorporate liquidity shocks into prices. Such findings are consistent with the notion that liquidity level overall is rather difficult for average investors to grasp. Information environment and investor inattention are not the market frictions that result in the market's underreaction to liquidity shocks.In the third chapter, my coauthors and I explore the impacts of early-life hardship experiences on corporate leaders' Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) decisions and address this question by exploiting the Down-to-the-Countryside Movement in China from 1956 to 1978. This movement is mandatory and is an extreme early-life hardship for the people involved. We find that the chairmen of the board and CEOs who were sent to the countryside and mountains have significantly less CSR practice in their companies than their peers who were not sent. We argue that corporate leaders have less CSR practice because they believe that they have already suffered enough in life and have developed an in-depth aversion to social contribution. Such results are especially strong for chairmen in state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and CEOs in non-state-owned companies(non-SOEs) because chairmen have more decision power in SOEs and CEOs have more decision power in non-SOEs. Moreover, this negative association is mediated by corporate leaders' college education and the corporate governance structure of the enterprise they lead.
ISBN: 9798535525457Subjects--Topical Terms:
600858
Law.
Subjects--Index Terms:
Consumer litigation funding
Essays on Finance and Law.
LDR
:04573nmm a2200445 4500
001
2344216
005
20230315113035.5
006
m o d
007
cr#unu||||||||
008
241004s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9798535525457
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI28736144
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)0187rice3344Dong
035
$a
AAI28736144
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Dong, Mengming Michael.
$3
3682977
245
1 0
$a
Essays on Finance and Law.
260
1
$a
Ann Arbor :
$b
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
$c
2020
300
$a
171 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-04, Section: B.
500
$a
Advisor: Grullon, Gustavo.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Rice University, 2020.
506
$a
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520
$a
This dissertation contains three chapters that study topics in financial economics and how finance affects legal outcomes. In the first chapter, I study how access to consumer litigation funding (CLF) impacts outcomes in the legal system. CLF provides cash advances to consumer plaintiffs in pursuing a tort complaint. Using exogenous variations in access to CLF resulting from staggered state law changes in the U.S., I find evidence that restricting CLF causes a decline in the number of tort lawsuits filed with courts by 18.7 percent. Such finding contrasts the theoretical predictions in the literature that CLF induces settlement, and could be due to the fact that, in reality, defendants hardly ever know whether the plaintiff is funded by CLF. I also find that restricting CLF increases the proportion of liability rulings at trial that favor the plaintiffs by 5.9 percentage points but does not change the portion of lawsuits that go to trial. Overall, these findings suggest that access to CLF either incentivizes plaintiffs to file lawsuits that are less likely to be successful in the court or induces moral hazards of plaintiffs during the trial process.In the second chapter, I examine the conflicting evidence in the finance literature on whether the equity markets underreact or overreact to liquidity shocks. Using comprehensive stock-level news data, I find that the market underreacts to liquidity shocks whether there is contemporaneous public news or not. Furthermore, when there is public news released contemporaneously, the price discovery process of liquidity shocks does not get any faster. In certain tests, the drift is actually significantly larger. This shows that even though public news reveals more information to investors and draws more investor attention, it does not help them incorporate liquidity shocks into prices. Such findings are consistent with the notion that liquidity level overall is rather difficult for average investors to grasp. Information environment and investor inattention are not the market frictions that result in the market's underreaction to liquidity shocks.In the third chapter, my coauthors and I explore the impacts of early-life hardship experiences on corporate leaders' Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) decisions and address this question by exploiting the Down-to-the-Countryside Movement in China from 1956 to 1978. This movement is mandatory and is an extreme early-life hardship for the people involved. We find that the chairmen of the board and CEOs who were sent to the countryside and mountains have significantly less CSR practice in their companies than their peers who were not sent. We argue that corporate leaders have less CSR practice because they believe that they have already suffered enough in life and have developed an in-depth aversion to social contribution. Such results are especially strong for chairmen in state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and CEOs in non-state-owned companies(non-SOEs) because chairmen have more decision power in SOEs and CEOs have more decision power in non-SOEs. Moreover, this negative association is mediated by corporate leaders' college education and the corporate governance structure of the enterprise they lead.
590
$a
School code: 0187.
650
4
$a
Law.
$3
600858
650
4
$a
Law enforcement.
$3
607408
650
4
$a
Behavioral psychology.
$3
2122788
650
4
$a
Finance.
$3
542899
650
4
$a
Evidence.
$3
583147
650
4
$a
Attorneys.
$3
3562898
650
4
$a
Funding.
$3
3557916
650
4
$a
Equilibrium.
$3
668417
650
4
$a
Injuries.
$3
3563044
650
4
$a
Liability.
$3
3562832
650
4
$a
State laws.
$3
3562915
650
4
$a
Legislatures.
$3
3682978
650
4
$a
Hypotheses.
$3
3560118
650
4
$a
Trials.
$3
623874
650
4
$a
Medical research.
$2
bicssc
$3
1556686
650
4
$a
Supreme Court decisions.
$3
3682979
650
4
$a
Medical malpractice.
$3
3682980
650
4
$a
Torts.
$3
768908
653
$a
Consumer litigation funding
653
$a
Financial constraints
653
$a
Liquidity shocks
653
$a
Public news
653
$a
Market's underreaction
653
$a
Early-life experiences
653
$a
Corporate social responsibilities
690
$a
0508
690
$a
0398
690
$a
0384
690
$a
0206
710
2
$a
Rice University.
$b
Business.
$3
3185780
773
0
$t
Dissertations Abstracts International
$g
83-04B.
790
$a
0187
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2020
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28736144
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9466654
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入